Risa Kagan, Antonio Cano, Rossella E Nappi, Marci L English, Shayna Mancuso, Xi Wu, Faith D Ottery
{"title":"非唑啉奈坦治疗更年期引起的中重度血管舒缩症状的安全性:三个随机3期研究的汇总分析","authors":"Risa Kagan, Antonio Cano, Rossella E Nappi, Marci L English, Shayna Mancuso, Xi Wu, Faith D Ottery","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03073-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the safety and tolerability of fezolinetant in women with vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause in a pooled analysis of data from three 52-week phase 3 studies (SKYLIGHT 1, 2, and 4).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 were double-blind, placebo-controlled studies where women (≥ 40 to ≤ 65 years), with moderate to severe VMS (minimum average ≥ 7 hot flashes/day) were randomized to once-daily placebo, fezolinetant 30 mg or 45 mg. After 12 weeks, those on placebo were re-randomized to fezolinetant 30 mg or 45 mg, while those on fezolinetant continued on their assigned dose for 40 weeks. SKYLIGHT 4 was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, 52-week safety study. Safety was assessed by frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and endometrial events. TEAEs of special interest included liver test elevations and endometrial hyperplasia or cancer or disordered proliferative endometrium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totals of 952 participants receiving placebo, 1100 receiving fezolinetant 45 mg, and 1103 receiving fezolinetant 30 mg took ≥ 1 dose of study medication. TEAEs occurred in 55.3%, 62.9%, and 65.4%, respectively; exposure-adjusted results were consistent with these results. Most frequent TEAEs in fezolinetant-treated participants included upper respiratory tract infection (7.7-8.3%), headache (6.8-8.2%), coronavirus disease 2019 (5.8-6.1%), back pain (3.1-3.7%), arthralgia (2.9-3.2%), diarrhea (2.3-3.2%), urinary tract infection (2.9-3.4%), and insomnia (2.0-3.0%). The incidence of drug-related serious TEAEs and associated treatment withdrawals was low. Elevations in liver transaminases occurred in 1.5-2.3% of fezolinetant-treated participants, were typically asymptomatic and transient, resolved on treatment or discontinuation, with no evidence of severe drug-induced liver injury (Hy's law). Endometrial safety results were well within US Food and Drug Administration criteria. Analysis of benign and non-benign neoplasm controlled for exposure demonstrated no increased risk versus placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pooled data confirm the safety and tolerability of fezolinetant over 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT04003155, NCT04003142, and NCT04003389. Graphical abstract available for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Fezolinetant for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Due to Menopause: Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Phase 3 Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Risa Kagan, Antonio Cano, Rossella E Nappi, Marci L English, Shayna Mancuso, Xi Wu, Faith D Ottery\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-03073-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the safety and tolerability of fezolinetant in women with vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause in a pooled analysis of data from three 52-week phase 3 studies (SKYLIGHT 1, 2, and 4).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 were double-blind, placebo-controlled studies where women (≥ 40 to ≤ 65 years), with moderate to severe VMS (minimum average ≥ 7 hot flashes/day) were randomized to once-daily placebo, fezolinetant 30 mg or 45 mg. After 12 weeks, those on placebo were re-randomized to fezolinetant 30 mg or 45 mg, while those on fezolinetant continued on their assigned dose for 40 weeks. SKYLIGHT 4 was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, 52-week safety study. Safety was assessed by frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and endometrial events. TEAEs of special interest included liver test elevations and endometrial hyperplasia or cancer or disordered proliferative endometrium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totals of 952 participants receiving placebo, 1100 receiving fezolinetant 45 mg, and 1103 receiving fezolinetant 30 mg took ≥ 1 dose of study medication. TEAEs occurred in 55.3%, 62.9%, and 65.4%, respectively; exposure-adjusted results were consistent with these results. Most frequent TEAEs in fezolinetant-treated participants included upper respiratory tract infection (7.7-8.3%), headache (6.8-8.2%), coronavirus disease 2019 (5.8-6.1%), back pain (3.1-3.7%), arthralgia (2.9-3.2%), diarrhea (2.3-3.2%), urinary tract infection (2.9-3.4%), and insomnia (2.0-3.0%). The incidence of drug-related serious TEAEs and associated treatment withdrawals was low. Elevations in liver transaminases occurred in 1.5-2.3% of fezolinetant-treated participants, were typically asymptomatic and transient, resolved on treatment or discontinuation, with no evidence of severe drug-induced liver injury (Hy's law). Endometrial safety results were well within US Food and Drug Administration criteria. Analysis of benign and non-benign neoplasm controlled for exposure demonstrated no increased risk versus placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pooled data confirm the safety and tolerability of fezolinetant over 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT04003155, NCT04003142, and NCT04003389. Graphical abstract available for this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03073-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03073-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety of Fezolinetant for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Due to Menopause: Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Phase 3 Studies.
Introduction: This study evaluated the safety and tolerability of fezolinetant in women with vasomotor symptoms (VMS) due to menopause in a pooled analysis of data from three 52-week phase 3 studies (SKYLIGHT 1, 2, and 4).
Methods: SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 were double-blind, placebo-controlled studies where women (≥ 40 to ≤ 65 years), with moderate to severe VMS (minimum average ≥ 7 hot flashes/day) were randomized to once-daily placebo, fezolinetant 30 mg or 45 mg. After 12 weeks, those on placebo were re-randomized to fezolinetant 30 mg or 45 mg, while those on fezolinetant continued on their assigned dose for 40 weeks. SKYLIGHT 4 was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, 52-week safety study. Safety was assessed by frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and endometrial events. TEAEs of special interest included liver test elevations and endometrial hyperplasia or cancer or disordered proliferative endometrium.
Results: Totals of 952 participants receiving placebo, 1100 receiving fezolinetant 45 mg, and 1103 receiving fezolinetant 30 mg took ≥ 1 dose of study medication. TEAEs occurred in 55.3%, 62.9%, and 65.4%, respectively; exposure-adjusted results were consistent with these results. Most frequent TEAEs in fezolinetant-treated participants included upper respiratory tract infection (7.7-8.3%), headache (6.8-8.2%), coronavirus disease 2019 (5.8-6.1%), back pain (3.1-3.7%), arthralgia (2.9-3.2%), diarrhea (2.3-3.2%), urinary tract infection (2.9-3.4%), and insomnia (2.0-3.0%). The incidence of drug-related serious TEAEs and associated treatment withdrawals was low. Elevations in liver transaminases occurred in 1.5-2.3% of fezolinetant-treated participants, were typically asymptomatic and transient, resolved on treatment or discontinuation, with no evidence of severe drug-induced liver injury (Hy's law). Endometrial safety results were well within US Food and Drug Administration criteria. Analysis of benign and non-benign neoplasm controlled for exposure demonstrated no increased risk versus placebo.
Conclusion: Pooled data confirm the safety and tolerability of fezolinetant over 52 weeks.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT04003155, NCT04003142, and NCT04003389. Graphical abstract available for this article.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.