二氧化碳封存技术可能通过气候-能源-空气-健康级联影响中国的可持续发展目标

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Zeyuan Liu, Kai Fang, Anqi Xu, Zuhui Zhang, Jing Zhu, Hetong Wang, Yi Zhang, Zhenci Xu, Fangming Jiang, Qingyu Zhang, Jinnan Wang
{"title":"二氧化碳封存技术可能通过气候-能源-空气-健康级联影响中国的可持续发展目标","authors":"Zeyuan Liu, Kai Fang, Anqi Xu, Zuhui Zhang, Jing Zhu, Hetong Wang, Yi Zhang, Zhenci Xu, Fangming Jiang, Qingyu Zhang, Jinnan Wang","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c09545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies (CSTs) allow for increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions without exceeding a chosen temperature limit by creating additional carbon budgets. While these CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies offer low-cost routes to net-zero emissions, namely, the CST benefits, they impede progress to the Sustainable Development Goals, namely, the CST disbenefits. Focusing on China, we assess both the CST disbenefits and benefits in the climate-energy-air-health cascade by an integrated modeling framework. We show that, CST can save 4.98–15.65 trillion CNY in achieving net-zero emissions while compromising the sustainability on non-fossil energy penetration, air quality, and public health improvement, leading to a substantial loss up to 7.82 trillion CNY during 2020–2060. Given the high likelihood of a large-scale deployment of CSTs in the future, pursuing policy coherence that balances trade-offs between CST disbenefits and benefits is vital. To that end, CSTs should be allocated to power sectors as a priority and stringent end-of-pipe equipment should be retrofitted into non-power sectors before CST allocation.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CO2 Sequestration Technologies May Undermine China’s Sustainable Development Goals through the Climate-Energy-Air-Health Cascade\",\"authors\":\"Zeyuan Liu, Kai Fang, Anqi Xu, Zuhui Zhang, Jing Zhu, Hetong Wang, Yi Zhang, Zhenci Xu, Fangming Jiang, Qingyu Zhang, Jinnan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c09545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies (CSTs) allow for increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions without exceeding a chosen temperature limit by creating additional carbon budgets. While these CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration technologies offer low-cost routes to net-zero emissions, namely, the CST benefits, they impede progress to the Sustainable Development Goals, namely, the CST disbenefits. Focusing on China, we assess both the CST disbenefits and benefits in the climate-energy-air-health cascade by an integrated modeling framework. We show that, CST can save 4.98–15.65 trillion CNY in achieving net-zero emissions while compromising the sustainability on non-fossil energy penetration, air quality, and public health improvement, leading to a substantial loss up to 7.82 trillion CNY during 2020–2060. Given the high likelihood of a large-scale deployment of CSTs in the future, pursuing policy coherence that balances trade-offs between CST disbenefits and benefits is vital. To that end, CSTs should be allocated to power sectors as a priority and stringent end-of-pipe equipment should be retrofitted into non-power sectors before CST allocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09545\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c09545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二氧化碳固存技术(CSTs)通过创造额外的碳预算,允许在不超过选定温度限制的情况下增加二氧化碳排放。虽然这些二氧化碳封存技术为实现净零排放提供了低成本的途径,即CST的优势,但它们阻碍了可持续发展目标的进展,即CST的劣势。以中国为例,我们通过一个综合建模框架评估了CST在气候-能源-空气健康级联中的利弊。我们发现,CST在实现净零排放方面可以节省4.98-15.65万亿元人民币,但在非化石能源渗透、空气质量和公共健康改善方面的可持续性方面会受到损害,导致2020-2060年期间高达7.82万亿元人民币的巨额损失。鉴于未来大规模部署CST的可能性很大,在CST利弊之间寻求平衡的政策一致性至关重要。为此目的,应优先将国家技术服务分配给电力部门,在国家技术服务分配之前,应将严格的管道末端设备改装到非电力部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CO2 Sequestration Technologies May Undermine China’s Sustainable Development Goals through the Climate-Energy-Air-Health Cascade

CO2 Sequestration Technologies May Undermine China’s Sustainable Development Goals through the Climate-Energy-Air-Health Cascade
CO2 sequestration technologies (CSTs) allow for increased CO2 emissions without exceeding a chosen temperature limit by creating additional carbon budgets. While these CO2 sequestration technologies offer low-cost routes to net-zero emissions, namely, the CST benefits, they impede progress to the Sustainable Development Goals, namely, the CST disbenefits. Focusing on China, we assess both the CST disbenefits and benefits in the climate-energy-air-health cascade by an integrated modeling framework. We show that, CST can save 4.98–15.65 trillion CNY in achieving net-zero emissions while compromising the sustainability on non-fossil energy penetration, air quality, and public health improvement, leading to a substantial loss up to 7.82 trillion CNY during 2020–2060. Given the high likelihood of a large-scale deployment of CSTs in the future, pursuing policy coherence that balances trade-offs between CST disbenefits and benefits is vital. To that end, CSTs should be allocated to power sectors as a priority and stringent end-of-pipe equipment should be retrofitted into non-power sectors before CST allocation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信