Şimal Köksal Cevher, Neşe Altınok Ersoy, Ezgi Çoşkun Yenigün, Mehmet Tuncay, Selim Turgay Arınsoy, Erdem Çankaya, Fatih Dede
{"title":"“护士主导教育”的影响vs。“护士主导教育加同伴支持”对慢性肾病患者腹膜透析治疗决定的影响。","authors":"Şimal Köksal Cevher, Neşe Altınok Ersoy, Ezgi Çoşkun Yenigün, Mehmet Tuncay, Selim Turgay Arınsoy, Erdem Çankaya, Fatih Dede","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>End-stage kidney disease patients face a critical decision regarding kidney replacement therapy options, which include kidney transplantation, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study aims to evaluate the impact of nurse-led education (NE) alone vs. NE combined with peer support on the patients' decision over PD treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted between 2018 and 2020, and patients were prospectively followed for the years 2018-2020. A total of 238 patients were selected from 500 outpatient clinic patients based on inclusion criteria and the principle of voluntary participation. Among 238 patients, 112 patients who received NE plus peer support as well as NE. Generalized linear models (GLM) analysis was employed to investigate the influence of NE and NE plus peer support on the decision of PD by patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the NE plus peer support group, 38% were aged 45-59, and 65% were male. Similarly, in the NE group, 38% were aged 45-59, and 60% were male. The study utilized GLM to analyze patients' decisions regarding the PD treatment. Model 1 examined the duration of NE plus peer support (Akaike Information Criterion [AIC] = 130.46, McFadden's pseudo-R-squared (ρ<sup>2</sup>) = 0.569), Model 2 focused on the duration of NE (AIC = 294.11, McFadden's ρ<sup>2</sup> = 0.011), Model 3 assessed the sufficiency of NE plus peer support (AIC = 142.98, McFadden's ρ<sup>2</sup> = 0.526), and Model 4 evaluated the sufficiency of NE alone (AIC = 296.53, McFadden's ρ<sup>2</sup> = 0.085).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education provided by nurse and supported by peer affects patients' decision of kidney replacement treatment. Through the implementation of effective peer education, healthcare providers can enable patients to make informed decisions that align with their personal values, preferences, and treatment objectives, thereby enhancing clinical outcomes and overall patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of \\\"nurse-led education\\\" vs. \\\"nurse-led education plus peer support\\\" on patients' decision for peritoneal dialysis treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.\",\"authors\":\"Şimal Köksal Cevher, Neşe Altınok Ersoy, Ezgi Çoşkun Yenigün, Mehmet Tuncay, Selim Turgay Arınsoy, Erdem Çankaya, Fatih Dede\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-9987.14248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>End-stage kidney disease patients face a critical decision regarding kidney replacement therapy options, which include kidney transplantation, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study aims to evaluate the impact of nurse-led education (NE) alone vs. NE combined with peer support on the patients' decision over PD treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted between 2018 and 2020, and patients were prospectively followed for the years 2018-2020. A total of 238 patients were selected from 500 outpatient clinic patients based on inclusion criteria and the principle of voluntary participation. Among 238 patients, 112 patients who received NE plus peer support as well as NE. Generalized linear models (GLM) analysis was employed to investigate the influence of NE and NE plus peer support on the decision of PD by patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the NE plus peer support group, 38% were aged 45-59, and 65% were male. Similarly, in the NE group, 38% were aged 45-59, and 60% were male. The study utilized GLM to analyze patients' decisions regarding the PD treatment. Model 1 examined the duration of NE plus peer support (Akaike Information Criterion [AIC] = 130.46, McFadden's pseudo-R-squared (ρ<sup>2</sup>) = 0.569), Model 2 focused on the duration of NE (AIC = 294.11, McFadden's ρ<sup>2</sup> = 0.011), Model 3 assessed the sufficiency of NE plus peer support (AIC = 142.98, McFadden's ρ<sup>2</sup> = 0.526), and Model 4 evaluated the sufficiency of NE alone (AIC = 296.53, McFadden's ρ<sup>2</sup> = 0.085).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education provided by nurse and supported by peer affects patients' decision of kidney replacement treatment. Through the implementation of effective peer education, healthcare providers can enable patients to make informed decisions that align with their personal values, preferences, and treatment objectives, thereby enhancing clinical outcomes and overall patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of "nurse-led education" vs. "nurse-led education plus peer support" on patients' decision for peritoneal dialysis treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.
Introduction: End-stage kidney disease patients face a critical decision regarding kidney replacement therapy options, which include kidney transplantation, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study aims to evaluate the impact of nurse-led education (NE) alone vs. NE combined with peer support on the patients' decision over PD treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.
Methods: The study was conducted between 2018 and 2020, and patients were prospectively followed for the years 2018-2020. A total of 238 patients were selected from 500 outpatient clinic patients based on inclusion criteria and the principle of voluntary participation. Among 238 patients, 112 patients who received NE plus peer support as well as NE. Generalized linear models (GLM) analysis was employed to investigate the influence of NE and NE plus peer support on the decision of PD by patients.
Results: In the NE plus peer support group, 38% were aged 45-59, and 65% were male. Similarly, in the NE group, 38% were aged 45-59, and 60% were male. The study utilized GLM to analyze patients' decisions regarding the PD treatment. Model 1 examined the duration of NE plus peer support (Akaike Information Criterion [AIC] = 130.46, McFadden's pseudo-R-squared (ρ2) = 0.569), Model 2 focused on the duration of NE (AIC = 294.11, McFadden's ρ2 = 0.011), Model 3 assessed the sufficiency of NE plus peer support (AIC = 142.98, McFadden's ρ2 = 0.526), and Model 4 evaluated the sufficiency of NE alone (AIC = 296.53, McFadden's ρ2 = 0.085).
Conclusions: Education provided by nurse and supported by peer affects patients' decision of kidney replacement treatment. Through the implementation of effective peer education, healthcare providers can enable patients to make informed decisions that align with their personal values, preferences, and treatment objectives, thereby enhancing clinical outcomes and overall patient satisfaction.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
