母乳喂养与自我报告的“成功母乳喂养10步”经验之间的联系:塞浦路斯产科诊所实践的横断面和纵向研究。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420670
Mary Economou, Ourania Kolokotroni, Irene Paphiti-Demetriou, Christiana Kouta, Ekaterini Lambrinou, Eleni Hadjigeorgiou, Vasiliki Hadjiona, Nicos Middleton
{"title":"母乳喂养与自我报告的“成功母乳喂养10步”经验之间的联系:塞浦路斯产科诊所实践的横断面和纵向研究。","authors":"Mary Economou, Ourania Kolokotroni, Irene Paphiti-Demetriou, Christiana Kouta, Ekaterini Lambrinou, Eleni Hadjigeorgiou, Vasiliki Hadjiona, Nicos Middleton","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the implementation of the \"10 Steps for Successful Breastfeeding\" and explore associations with any Breastfeeding (BF) and Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) initiation and continuation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation of the 10 Steps was assessed based on a consecutive sample of 568 mothers' self-reported experience across all public (<i>N</i> = 5) and 29 (of 35) private maternity clinics using the WHO/UNICEF BFHI questionnaire (Section 4) within the first 24-48 h after birth. BF and EBF were estimated within 48 h after birth as well as at 1st, 4th and 6th month based on a self-reported current status method. Associations with initiation and continuation of any BF and EBF up to the 6th month were explored in logistic regression after adjusting for potential confounders. Associations were explored with individual steps as well as the overall experience, operationalized as the sum score of full, partial or no implementation of each item, with the exception of Step 6 (exclusive breastfeeding).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At mean score 6.2 (SD = 2.7), the overall 10 Steps experience was low (theoretical range 0-14), even among those who breastfed exclusively (M = 7.7, SD = 2.0). EBF and BF initiation and continuation showed a stepwise association with self-reported experience of the 10 Steps. Across quartiles of increasing scores within 48 h after birth, the prevalence of EBF was 7.5%, 14.4%, 19.0%, and 34.2%. Mothers who experienced full or partial implementation of Step 4 (i.e., early initiation with skin-to-skin) were more likely to continue BF and EBF up to the 4th month, while use of pacifiers (Step 9) was more likely to have an adverse effect on breastfeeding continuation and exclusivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BFIH's \"10 Steps\" are associated with BF initiation while certain practices seem to be more strongly associated with exclusivity and continuation of breastfeeding up to the sixth month. While breastfeeding intention may determine the experience of the 10 Steps, this also suggests that maternity care practices can have a supportive role for mothers to succeed their intentions to BF and EBF.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1420670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between breastfeeding and self-reported experience of the \\\"10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding\\\": a cross-sectional and longitudinal study of maternity clinic practices in Cyprus.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Economou, Ourania Kolokotroni, Irene Paphiti-Demetriou, Christiana Kouta, Ekaterini Lambrinou, Eleni Hadjigeorgiou, Vasiliki Hadjiona, Nicos Middleton\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the implementation of the \\\"10 Steps for Successful Breastfeeding\\\" and explore associations with any Breastfeeding (BF) and Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) initiation and continuation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implementation of the 10 Steps was assessed based on a consecutive sample of 568 mothers' self-reported experience across all public (<i>N</i> = 5) and 29 (of 35) private maternity clinics using the WHO/UNICEF BFHI questionnaire (Section 4) within the first 24-48 h after birth. BF and EBF were estimated within 48 h after birth as well as at 1st, 4th and 6th month based on a self-reported current status method. Associations with initiation and continuation of any BF and EBF up to the 6th month were explored in logistic regression after adjusting for potential confounders. Associations were explored with individual steps as well as the overall experience, operationalized as the sum score of full, partial or no implementation of each item, with the exception of Step 6 (exclusive breastfeeding).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At mean score 6.2 (SD = 2.7), the overall 10 Steps experience was low (theoretical range 0-14), even among those who breastfed exclusively (M = 7.7, SD = 2.0). EBF and BF initiation and continuation showed a stepwise association with self-reported experience of the 10 Steps. Across quartiles of increasing scores within 48 h after birth, the prevalence of EBF was 7.5%, 14.4%, 19.0%, and 34.2%. Mothers who experienced full or partial implementation of Step 4 (i.e., early initiation with skin-to-skin) were more likely to continue BF and EBF up to the 4th month, while use of pacifiers (Step 9) was more likely to have an adverse effect on breastfeeding continuation and exclusivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BFIH's \\\"10 Steps\\\" are associated with BF initiation while certain practices seem to be more strongly associated with exclusivity and continuation of breastfeeding up to the sixth month. While breastfeeding intention may determine the experience of the 10 Steps, this also suggests that maternity care practices can have a supportive role for mothers to succeed their intentions to BF and EBF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1420670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683129/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1420670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估“成功母乳喂养10步”的实施情况,并探讨其与任何母乳喂养(BF)和纯母乳喂养(EBF)开始和继续的关系。方法:通过使用世卫组织/联合国儿童基金会BFHI问卷(第4节),对所有公立(N = 5)和29(35个)私立妇产诊所的568名母亲在出生后24-48小时内的自我报告经历进行连续抽样,评估10个步骤的实施情况。根据自我报告的现状法,在出生后48小时内以及第1、4和6个月估计BF和EBF。在调整潜在混杂因素后,通过逻辑回归探讨了任何BF和EBF的开始和持续至6个月的关系。除了第6步(纯母乳喂养)之外,研究了个体步骤和整体经验之间的联系,并将每个项目的完全实施、部分实施或未实施的总得分进行了操作。结果:平均得分为6.2 (SD = 2.7),整体10步经验较低(理论范围0-14),即使是纯母乳喂养的人(M = 7.7, SD = 2.0)。EBF和BF的开始和持续与自我报告的10个步骤的经验呈逐步相关。在出生后48小时内评分增加的四分位数中,EBF的患病率分别为7.5%、14.4%、19.0%和34.2%。完全或部分实施第4步(即早期开始皮肤对皮肤)的母亲更有可能将BF和EBF持续到第4个月,而使用安抚奶嘴(第9步)更有可能对母乳喂养的延续和排他性产生不利影响。结论:BFIH的“10个步骤”与男朋友的开始有关,而某些做法似乎与排他性和持续母乳喂养到6个月更密切相关。虽然母乳喂养意图可能决定了10步的经验,但这也表明,产妇护理实践可以对母亲实现其BF和EBF的意图起到支持作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between breastfeeding and self-reported experience of the "10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding": a cross-sectional and longitudinal study of maternity clinic practices in Cyprus.

Objective: To assess the implementation of the "10 Steps for Successful Breastfeeding" and explore associations with any Breastfeeding (BF) and Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) initiation and continuation.

Methods: Implementation of the 10 Steps was assessed based on a consecutive sample of 568 mothers' self-reported experience across all public (N = 5) and 29 (of 35) private maternity clinics using the WHO/UNICEF BFHI questionnaire (Section 4) within the first 24-48 h after birth. BF and EBF were estimated within 48 h after birth as well as at 1st, 4th and 6th month based on a self-reported current status method. Associations with initiation and continuation of any BF and EBF up to the 6th month were explored in logistic regression after adjusting for potential confounders. Associations were explored with individual steps as well as the overall experience, operationalized as the sum score of full, partial or no implementation of each item, with the exception of Step 6 (exclusive breastfeeding).

Results: At mean score 6.2 (SD = 2.7), the overall 10 Steps experience was low (theoretical range 0-14), even among those who breastfed exclusively (M = 7.7, SD = 2.0). EBF and BF initiation and continuation showed a stepwise association with self-reported experience of the 10 Steps. Across quartiles of increasing scores within 48 h after birth, the prevalence of EBF was 7.5%, 14.4%, 19.0%, and 34.2%. Mothers who experienced full or partial implementation of Step 4 (i.e., early initiation with skin-to-skin) were more likely to continue BF and EBF up to the 4th month, while use of pacifiers (Step 9) was more likely to have an adverse effect on breastfeeding continuation and exclusivity.

Conclusion: The BFIH's "10 Steps" are associated with BF initiation while certain practices seem to be more strongly associated with exclusivity and continuation of breastfeeding up to the sixth month. While breastfeeding intention may determine the experience of the 10 Steps, this also suggests that maternity care practices can have a supportive role for mothers to succeed their intentions to BF and EBF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信