执业放射科医师的CME偏好和观点。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110391
Christine Lamoureux, Eric Rohren, Edward Callaway, Erin Vair-Grilley, Scott G Baginski, Phil Ramis, Tarek N Hanna
{"title":"执业放射科医师的CME偏好和观点。","authors":"Christine Lamoureux, Eric Rohren, Edward Callaway, Erin Vair-Grilley, Scott G Baginski, Phil Ramis, Tarek N Hanna","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To evaluate radiologists' perspectives regarding American Medical Association Category 1 Continuing Medical Education (Cat-1 CME) activities in private practice (PP) and teleradiology (TR), as well as American Board of Radiology Maintenance of Certification (ABR MOC) program participation status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic survey informed by existing literature regarding physician Cat-1 CME use and opinions was distributed via email to a national radiology practice. The survey was open for seventeen days in 2023, with a single reminder. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson Chi square hypothesis testing and logistic regression modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 19.2 % (599/3112). Of the 588 ABR certified, 65.6 % (n = 386) of respondents participated in ABR MOC, 50.9 % (n = 299) were in TR and 43.4 % (n = 255) were in PP. PP was associated with a greater participation in the ABR MOC program than TR (p0.05). Format (42 %) and content/topic (35 %) were the most important reasons for CME selection. PP radiologists preferred live in person lectures 1.94 times over TR. ABR MOC participants were 1.82 times more likely to select \"cost\" as the most important reason for choosing a Cat-1 CME activity, had lower odds of agreeing that Cat-1 CME helped maintain and improve skills, and had lower odds of being satisfied with Cat-1 CME activities available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TR and PP settings in addition to ABR MOC participation status are associated with differences in Cat-1 CME-related preferences and perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"118 ","pages":"110391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CME preferences and perspectives among practicing radiologists.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Lamoureux, Eric Rohren, Edward Callaway, Erin Vair-Grilley, Scott G Baginski, Phil Ramis, Tarek N Hanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To evaluate radiologists' perspectives regarding American Medical Association Category 1 Continuing Medical Education (Cat-1 CME) activities in private practice (PP) and teleradiology (TR), as well as American Board of Radiology Maintenance of Certification (ABR MOC) program participation status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic survey informed by existing literature regarding physician Cat-1 CME use and opinions was distributed via email to a national radiology practice. The survey was open for seventeen days in 2023, with a single reminder. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson Chi square hypothesis testing and logistic regression modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 19.2 % (599/3112). Of the 588 ABR certified, 65.6 % (n = 386) of respondents participated in ABR MOC, 50.9 % (n = 299) were in TR and 43.4 % (n = 255) were in PP. PP was associated with a greater participation in the ABR MOC program than TR (p0.05). Format (42 %) and content/topic (35 %) were the most important reasons for CME selection. PP radiologists preferred live in person lectures 1.94 times over TR. ABR MOC participants were 1.82 times more likely to select \\\"cost\\\" as the most important reason for choosing a Cat-1 CME activity, had lower odds of agreeing that Cat-1 CME helped maintain and improve skills, and had lower odds of being satisfied with Cat-1 CME activities available.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TR and PP settings in addition to ABR MOC participation status are associated with differences in Cat-1 CME-related preferences and perspectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"110391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理和目标:评估放射科医生对美国医学协会第一类继续医学教育(Cat-1 CME)在私人执业(PP)和远程放射学(TR)中的活动,以及美国放射学维护认证委员会(ABR MOC)项目参与状况的看法。材料和方法:根据现有文献对医师Cat-1 CME的使用和意见进行电子调查,并通过电子邮件发送给国家放射学实践。这项调查在2023年开放了17天,只有一个提醒。采用皮尔逊卡方假设检验和logistic回归模型进行统计分析。结果:有效率为19.2%(599/3112)。在588名获得ABR认证的受访者中,65.6% (n = 386)的人参加了ABR MOC, 50.9% (n = 299)的人参加了TR, 43.4% (n = 255)的人参加了PP。PP对ABR MOC项目的参与程度高于TR (p0.05)。形式(42%)和内容/主题(35%)是选择CME的最重要原因。PP放射科医生比TR更喜欢现场讲座1.94倍。ABR MOC参与者选择“成本”作为选择Cat-1 CME活动的最重要原因的可能性是1.82倍,同意Cat-1 CME有助于维持和提高技能的几率较低,并且对可用的Cat-1 CME活动感到满意的几率较低。结论:TR和PP设置以及ABR MOC参与状态与Cat-1 cme相关偏好和观点的差异有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CME preferences and perspectives among practicing radiologists.

Rationale and objectives: To evaluate radiologists' perspectives regarding American Medical Association Category 1 Continuing Medical Education (Cat-1 CME) activities in private practice (PP) and teleradiology (TR), as well as American Board of Radiology Maintenance of Certification (ABR MOC) program participation status.

Materials and methods: An electronic survey informed by existing literature regarding physician Cat-1 CME use and opinions was distributed via email to a national radiology practice. The survey was open for seventeen days in 2023, with a single reminder. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson Chi square hypothesis testing and logistic regression modeling.

Results: Response rate was 19.2 % (599/3112). Of the 588 ABR certified, 65.6 % (n = 386) of respondents participated in ABR MOC, 50.9 % (n = 299) were in TR and 43.4 % (n = 255) were in PP. PP was associated with a greater participation in the ABR MOC program than TR (p0.05). Format (42 %) and content/topic (35 %) were the most important reasons for CME selection. PP radiologists preferred live in person lectures 1.94 times over TR. ABR MOC participants were 1.82 times more likely to select "cost" as the most important reason for choosing a Cat-1 CME activity, had lower odds of agreeing that Cat-1 CME helped maintain and improve skills, and had lower odds of being satisfied with Cat-1 CME activities available.

Conclusion: TR and PP settings in addition to ABR MOC participation status are associated with differences in Cat-1 CME-related preferences and perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信