清醒大鼠胃运动的磁共振成像。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xiaokai Wang, Fatimah Alkaabi, Ashley Cornett, Minkyu Choi, Ulrich M Scheven, Madeleine R Di Natale, John B Furness, Zhongming Liu
{"title":"清醒大鼠胃运动的磁共振成像。","authors":"Xiaokai Wang, Fatimah Alkaabi, Ashley Cornett, Minkyu Choi, Ulrich M Scheven, Madeleine R Di Natale, John B Furness, Zhongming Liu","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastrointestinal (GI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables simultaneous assessment of gastric peristalsis, emptying, and intestinal filling and transit. However, GI MRI in animals typically requires anesthesia, which complicates physiology and confounds interpretation and translation to humans. This study aimed to establish GI MRI in conscious rats, and for the first time, characterize GI motor functions in awake versus anesthetized conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen Sprague-Dawley rats were acclimated to remain awake, still, and minimally stressed during MRI. GI MRI was performed under both awake and anesthetized conditions following voluntary consumption of a contrast-enhanced test meal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Awake rats remained physiologically stable during MRI, giving rise to gastric emptying of 23.7% ± 1.4% at 48 min and robust peristaltic contractions propagating through the antrum at 0.72 ± 0.04 mm/s, with a relative amplitude of 40.7% ± 2.3% and a frequency of 5.1 ± 0.1 cycles per minute. Under anesthesia, gastric emptying was approximately halved, mainly due to a significant reduction in peristaltic contraction amplitude, rather than the change in propagation speed, whereas the contraction frequency remained unchanged. Additionally, the small intestine showed faster filling and stronger motility in awake rats.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of GI MRI in awake rats and highlights notable differences in gastric and intestinal motility between awake and anesthetized states. Our protocol provides a novel and valuable framework for preclinical studies of GI physiology and pathophysiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14982"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Gastric Motility in Conscious Rats.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaokai Wang, Fatimah Alkaabi, Ashley Cornett, Minkyu Choi, Ulrich M Scheven, Madeleine R Di Natale, John B Furness, Zhongming Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastrointestinal (GI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables simultaneous assessment of gastric peristalsis, emptying, and intestinal filling and transit. However, GI MRI in animals typically requires anesthesia, which complicates physiology and confounds interpretation and translation to humans. This study aimed to establish GI MRI in conscious rats, and for the first time, characterize GI motor functions in awake versus anesthetized conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen Sprague-Dawley rats were acclimated to remain awake, still, and minimally stressed during MRI. GI MRI was performed under both awake and anesthetized conditions following voluntary consumption of a contrast-enhanced test meal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Awake rats remained physiologically stable during MRI, giving rise to gastric emptying of 23.7% ± 1.4% at 48 min and robust peristaltic contractions propagating through the antrum at 0.72 ± 0.04 mm/s, with a relative amplitude of 40.7% ± 2.3% and a frequency of 5.1 ± 0.1 cycles per minute. Under anesthesia, gastric emptying was approximately halved, mainly due to a significant reduction in peristaltic contraction amplitude, rather than the change in propagation speed, whereas the contraction frequency remained unchanged. Additionally, the small intestine showed faster filling and stronger motility in awake rats.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of GI MRI in awake rats and highlights notable differences in gastric and intestinal motility between awake and anesthetized states. Our protocol provides a novel and valuable framework for preclinical studies of GI physiology and pathophysiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14982\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃肠(GI)磁共振成像(MRI)可以同时评估胃蠕动、排空、肠道充盈和转运。然而,动物GI MRI通常需要麻醉,这使生理学变得复杂,并且混淆了对人类的解释和翻译。本研究旨在建立清醒大鼠的GI MRI,并首次表征清醒与麻醉状态下的GI运动功能。方法:14只Sprague-Dawley大鼠在MRI期间适应保持清醒,静止和最低压力。GI MRI是在清醒和麻醉条件下进行的,在自愿食用对比增强测试餐后。结果:清醒大鼠在MRI期间保持生理稳定,48 min胃排空率为23.7%±1.4%,通过胃窦传播的蠕动收缩强度为0.72±0.04 mm/s,相对幅度为40.7%±2.3%,频率为5.1±0.1 cycles / min。麻醉下胃排空量大约减半,主要是由于蠕动收缩幅度明显减小,而不是由于传播速度的变化,而收缩频率保持不变。此外,清醒大鼠小肠充盈速度更快,运动性更强。结论:本研究证明了GI MRI在清醒大鼠中的可行性,并强调了清醒和麻醉状态下胃和肠运动的显著差异。我们的方案为GI生理学和病理生理学的临床前研究提供了一个新颖而有价值的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Gastric Motility in Conscious Rats.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables simultaneous assessment of gastric peristalsis, emptying, and intestinal filling and transit. However, GI MRI in animals typically requires anesthesia, which complicates physiology and confounds interpretation and translation to humans. This study aimed to establish GI MRI in conscious rats, and for the first time, characterize GI motor functions in awake versus anesthetized conditions.

Methods: Fourteen Sprague-Dawley rats were acclimated to remain awake, still, and minimally stressed during MRI. GI MRI was performed under both awake and anesthetized conditions following voluntary consumption of a contrast-enhanced test meal.

Results: Awake rats remained physiologically stable during MRI, giving rise to gastric emptying of 23.7% ± 1.4% at 48 min and robust peristaltic contractions propagating through the antrum at 0.72 ± 0.04 mm/s, with a relative amplitude of 40.7% ± 2.3% and a frequency of 5.1 ± 0.1 cycles per minute. Under anesthesia, gastric emptying was approximately halved, mainly due to a significant reduction in peristaltic contraction amplitude, rather than the change in propagation speed, whereas the contraction frequency remained unchanged. Additionally, the small intestine showed faster filling and stronger motility in awake rats.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of GI MRI in awake rats and highlights notable differences in gastric and intestinal motility between awake and anesthetized states. Our protocol provides a novel and valuable framework for preclinical studies of GI physiology and pathophysiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信