评估金黄色葡萄球菌在牛肉和火鸡配方从10°C至54.4°C长时间慢煮期间的生长情况。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Subash Shrestha , Michelle Riemann , Vijay K. Juneja , Abhinav Mishra
{"title":"评估金黄色葡萄球菌在牛肉和火鸡配方从10°C至54.4°C长时间慢煮期间的生长情况。","authors":"Subash Shrestha ,&nbsp;Michelle Riemann ,&nbsp;Vijay K. Juneja ,&nbsp;Abhinav Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>USDA FSIS recommends meat dwell ≤6 h during cooking from 10 to 54.4 °C to limit the growth of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and prevent its production of heat-stable enterotoxins. This study evaluated the growth of <em>S. aureus</em> in irradiated beef and turkey formulations with no antimicrobial, lactate-diacetate (2.5% w/w), or vinegar (1.98% w/w). Individual experimental units consisting of a 5 g portion of meat in a plastic bag were inoculated with 3 log CFU/g of <em>S. aureus</em> and then spread thin within the bag. Units were heated from 10 to 54.4 °C in 9.3 h in a water bath, representing a process deviation case in a commercial establishment. <em>S. aureus</em> populations were enumerated on Baird-Parker agar plates from five inoculated units before cooking, and three units each at 4.5, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.3 h. Likewise, two uninoculated units each were evaluated at 0, 6, and 9.3 h to verify the absence of competition from background microflora. Data from three trials were reported as mean ± SD. Beef formulations had pH, moisture, and salt content of 6.41 ± 0.25, 74.1 ± 0.5%, and 0.6 ± 0.1%, respectively, whereas turkey had 6.74 ± 0.08, 76.4 ± 0.6%, and 0.6 ± 0.1%, representing the most optimum condition for growth present in the commercial products. Maximum growth of 1.1 ± 0.2 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), 0.9 ± 0.3 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), and 0.2 ± 0.1 (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) log CFU/g was observed by the 6th h in beef with no antimicrobial, lactate diacetate, and vinegar, respectively, and 1.6 ± 0.2 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), 1.3 ± 0.3 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), and 0.5 ± 0.3 (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) log CFU/g in the turkey formulations also by the 6th h. The counts declined thereafter (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in all formulations, reaching below the inoculation level by 9.3 h. In comparison, UW Therm 2.0 and DMRI Staphtox Predictor, after adjusting for their temperature limitations per USDA FSIS guidelines, estimated a 4.2 and 3.3 log increase, respectively, in beef with no antimicrobial, and 4.3 and 3.7 log increase in turkey. The models provide fail-safe but overly conservative predictions of <em>S. aureus</em> growth in beef and turkey.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 2","pages":"Article 100445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Growth of Staphylococcus aureus During Slow Cooking of Beef and Turkey Formulations from 10 °C to 54.4 °C for an Extended Time\",\"authors\":\"Subash Shrestha ,&nbsp;Michelle Riemann ,&nbsp;Vijay K. Juneja ,&nbsp;Abhinav Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>USDA FSIS recommends meat dwell ≤6 h during cooking from 10 to 54.4 °C to limit the growth of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and prevent its production of heat-stable enterotoxins. This study evaluated the growth of <em>S. aureus</em> in irradiated beef and turkey formulations with no antimicrobial, lactate-diacetate (2.5% w/w), or vinegar (1.98% w/w). Individual experimental units consisting of a 5 g portion of meat in a plastic bag were inoculated with 3 log CFU/g of <em>S. aureus</em> and then spread thin within the bag. Units were heated from 10 to 54.4 °C in 9.3 h in a water bath, representing a process deviation case in a commercial establishment. <em>S. aureus</em> populations were enumerated on Baird-Parker agar plates from five inoculated units before cooking, and three units each at 4.5, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.3 h. Likewise, two uninoculated units each were evaluated at 0, 6, and 9.3 h to verify the absence of competition from background microflora. Data from three trials were reported as mean ± SD. Beef formulations had pH, moisture, and salt content of 6.41 ± 0.25, 74.1 ± 0.5%, and 0.6 ± 0.1%, respectively, whereas turkey had 6.74 ± 0.08, 76.4 ± 0.6%, and 0.6 ± 0.1%, representing the most optimum condition for growth present in the commercial products. Maximum growth of 1.1 ± 0.2 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), 0.9 ± 0.3 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), and 0.2 ± 0.1 (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) log CFU/g was observed by the 6th h in beef with no antimicrobial, lactate diacetate, and vinegar, respectively, and 1.6 ± 0.2 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), 1.3 ± 0.3 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), and 0.5 ± 0.3 (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) log CFU/g in the turkey formulations also by the 6th h. The counts declined thereafter (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) in all formulations, reaching below the inoculation level by 9.3 h. In comparison, UW Therm 2.0 and DMRI Staphtox Predictor, after adjusting for their temperature limitations per USDA FSIS guidelines, estimated a 4.2 and 3.3 log increase, respectively, in beef with no antimicrobial, and 4.3 and 3.7 log increase in turkey. The models provide fail-safe but overly conservative predictions of <em>S. aureus</em> growth in beef and turkey.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24002291\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24002291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国农业部食品安全检验局建议肉类在烹饪过程中从10°C到54.4°C停留≤6小时,以限制金黄色葡萄球菌的生长并防止其产生热稳定的肠毒素。本研究评估了金黄色葡萄球菌在未添加抗菌剂、乳酸-双乙酸盐(2.5% w/w)或醋(1.98% w/w)的辐照牛肉和火鸡配方中的生长情况。每个实验单元由5克装在塑料袋里的肉组成,接种3 log CFU/g金黄色葡萄球菌,然后在袋子里摊薄。装置在水浴中从10°C加热到54.4°C,耗时9.3小时,代表了商业机构的工艺偏差情况。在烹饪前在Baird-Parker琼脂板上从5个接种单位中枚举金黄色葡萄球菌种群,在4.5、6.0、7.0、8.0和9.3 h分别枚举3个接种单位。同样,在0、6和9.3 h分别评估2个未接种单位,以验证背景菌群是否存在竞争。三个试验的数据以mean±SD报告。牛肉配方的pH值、水分和含盐量分别为6.41±0.25、74.1±0.5%和0.6±0.1%,而火鸡配方的pH值、水分和含盐量分别为6.74±0.08、76.4±0.6%和0.6±0.1%,是目前商业产品中最适宜生长的配方。在不添加抗菌剂、双醋酸乳酸和醋的牛肉配方中,在第6小时的最大生长量分别为1.1±0.2 (p0.05) log CFU/g,在火鸡配方中,在第6小时的最大生长量也为1.6±0.2 (p0.05) log CFU/g
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Growth of Staphylococcus aureus During Slow Cooking of Beef and Turkey Formulations from 10 °C to 54.4 °C for an Extended Time
USDA FSIS recommends meat dwell ≤6 h during cooking from 10 to 54.4 °C to limit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and prevent its production of heat-stable enterotoxins. This study evaluated the growth of S. aureus in irradiated beef and turkey formulations with no antimicrobial, lactate-diacetate (2.5% w/w), or vinegar (1.98% w/w). Individual experimental units consisting of a 5 g portion of meat in a plastic bag were inoculated with 3 log CFU/g of S. aureus and then spread thin within the bag. Units were heated from 10 to 54.4 °C in 9.3 h in a water bath, representing a process deviation case in a commercial establishment. S. aureus populations were enumerated on Baird-Parker agar plates from five inoculated units before cooking, and three units each at 4.5, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 9.3 h. Likewise, two uninoculated units each were evaluated at 0, 6, and 9.3 h to verify the absence of competition from background microflora. Data from three trials were reported as mean ± SD. Beef formulations had pH, moisture, and salt content of 6.41 ± 0.25, 74.1 ± 0.5%, and 0.6 ± 0.1%, respectively, whereas turkey had 6.74 ± 0.08, 76.4 ± 0.6%, and 0.6 ± 0.1%, representing the most optimum condition for growth present in the commercial products. Maximum growth of 1.1 ± 0.2 (p < 0.05), 0.9 ± 0.3 (p < 0.05), and 0.2 ± 0.1 (p > 0.05) log CFU/g was observed by the 6th h in beef with no antimicrobial, lactate diacetate, and vinegar, respectively, and 1.6 ± 0.2 (p < 0.05), 1.3 ± 0.3 (p < 0.05), and 0.5 ± 0.3 (p > 0.05) log CFU/g in the turkey formulations also by the 6th h. The counts declined thereafter (p < 0.05) in all formulations, reaching below the inoculation level by 9.3 h. In comparison, UW Therm 2.0 and DMRI Staphtox Predictor, after adjusting for their temperature limitations per USDA FSIS guidelines, estimated a 4.2 and 3.3 log increase, respectively, in beef with no antimicrobial, and 4.3 and 3.7 log increase in turkey. The models provide fail-safe but overly conservative predictions of S. aureus growth in beef and turkey.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信