{"title":"抗凝治疗预防经导管主动脉瓣置换术后亚临床小叶血栓形成:综合文献综述及未来发展方向","authors":"Norma Nicole Gamarra-Valverde , Diane Masket , Mariana L. Henry , Adriana C. Mares , Tasha Phillips-Wilson , Apurva Bhavana Challa , Khristian Burke , Lina Ayasrah , Udochukwu Godswill Anosike , Enrique Garcia-Sayan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) presents a significant challenge, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is increasingly recognized, and there is a growing concern about its role in clinical events and hemodynamic valve deterioration. Current recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following TAVR are primarily based on expert consensus rather than definitive evidence from randomized trials, resulting in a variety of antithrombotic strategies in clinical practice. While observational data suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation may be beneficial, clinical trial results are inconsistent, particularly for patients without an existing indication for OAC. Given the conflicting findings and potential safety concerns associated with prophylactic anticoagulation, further research is imperative. This review aims to summarize the existing literature on risk factors for SLT, preventive strategies, current recommendations, and future research directions to better understand the benefits and risks of prophylactic anticoagulation in this context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"422 ","pages":"Article 132946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of subclinical leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive literature review and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Norma Nicole Gamarra-Valverde , Diane Masket , Mariana L. Henry , Adriana C. Mares , Tasha Phillips-Wilson , Apurva Bhavana Challa , Khristian Burke , Lina Ayasrah , Udochukwu Godswill Anosike , Enrique Garcia-Sayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) presents a significant challenge, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is increasingly recognized, and there is a growing concern about its role in clinical events and hemodynamic valve deterioration. Current recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following TAVR are primarily based on expert consensus rather than definitive evidence from randomized trials, resulting in a variety of antithrombotic strategies in clinical practice. While observational data suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation may be beneficial, clinical trial results are inconsistent, particularly for patients without an existing indication for OAC. Given the conflicting findings and potential safety concerns associated with prophylactic anticoagulation, further research is imperative. This review aims to summarize the existing literature on risk factors for SLT, preventive strategies, current recommendations, and future research directions to better understand the benefits and risks of prophylactic anticoagulation in this context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"422 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324015687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324015687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anticoagulation therapy for the prevention of subclinical leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A comprehensive literature review and future directions
Leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) presents a significant challenge, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is increasingly recognized, and there is a growing concern about its role in clinical events and hemodynamic valve deterioration. Current recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following TAVR are primarily based on expert consensus rather than definitive evidence from randomized trials, resulting in a variety of antithrombotic strategies in clinical practice. While observational data suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation may be beneficial, clinical trial results are inconsistent, particularly for patients without an existing indication for OAC. Given the conflicting findings and potential safety concerns associated with prophylactic anticoagulation, further research is imperative. This review aims to summarize the existing literature on risk factors for SLT, preventive strategies, current recommendations, and future research directions to better understand the benefits and risks of prophylactic anticoagulation in this context.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.