Nourhan M Aly, Mona K El Kashlan, Nicolas Giraudeau, Maha El Tantawi
{"title":"儿童接受口腔内照相机和智能手机检测龋齿:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Nourhan M Aly, Mona K El Kashlan, Nicolas Giraudeau, Maha El Tantawi","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teledentistry can improve access to care, but children's acceptance of different imaging techniques is underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess children's acceptance of intraoral cameras and smartphones for caries detection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted in rural Egyptian nurseries, with children aged ≤ 6 years randomized into intraoral camera or smartphone groups. Behavior during imaging was assessed using four indicators: fear, mouth-opening difficulty, opposition, and cooperation, with a total score calculated from their sum. Imaging time was recorded, and mood was assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Linear regression assessed associations between behavior and time with technique and mood, adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 508 children, mean (SD) = age 4.54 [1.04] years. Children in the intraoral group showed higher fear and difficulty keeping their mouths open, with lower overall behavior scores (mean [SD] = 16.64 [2.95] vs. 17.18 [3.06], B = -1.05, p < 0.001). The intraoral camera required less time (mean [SD] = 3.62 [1.49] vs. 5.33 [2.82] minutes, B = -1.56, p < 0.001). Positive mood improved behavior (B = 0.25, p < 0.001), while negative mood increased time (B = 0.30, p < 0.001) and worsened behavior (B = -0.64, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smartphones improved behavior, while intraoral cameras were more time-efficient. Device choice should balance efficiency with child comfort.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06019884.</p>","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children's Acceptance of Intraoral Cameras and Smartphones for Caries Detection: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nourhan M Aly, Mona K El Kashlan, Nicolas Giraudeau, Maha El Tantawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ipd.13291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teledentistry can improve access to care, but children's acceptance of different imaging techniques is underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess children's acceptance of intraoral cameras and smartphones for caries detection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted in rural Egyptian nurseries, with children aged ≤ 6 years randomized into intraoral camera or smartphone groups. Behavior during imaging was assessed using four indicators: fear, mouth-opening difficulty, opposition, and cooperation, with a total score calculated from their sum. Imaging time was recorded, and mood was assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Linear regression assessed associations between behavior and time with technique and mood, adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 508 children, mean (SD) = age 4.54 [1.04] years. Children in the intraoral group showed higher fear and difficulty keeping their mouths open, with lower overall behavior scores (mean [SD] = 16.64 [2.95] vs. 17.18 [3.06], B = -1.05, p < 0.001). The intraoral camera required less time (mean [SD] = 3.62 [1.49] vs. 5.33 [2.82] minutes, B = -1.56, p < 0.001). Positive mood improved behavior (B = 0.25, p < 0.001), while negative mood increased time (B = 0.30, p < 0.001) and worsened behavior (B = -0.64, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smartphones improved behavior, while intraoral cameras were more time-efficient. Device choice should balance efficiency with child comfort.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06019884.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13291\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:远程牙科学可以改善获得护理的机会,但儿童对不同成像技术的接受程度尚未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究的目的是评估儿童对口腔内相机和智能手机进行龋齿检测的接受程度。设计:在埃及农村托儿所进行随机对照试验,将≤6岁的儿童随机分为口内相机组和智能手机组。成像过程中的行为使用四个指标进行评估:恐惧、张嘴困难、反对和合作,并从它们的总和计算总分。记录成像时间,并使用积极和消极情绪量表评估情绪。线性回归评估了行为和时间与技术和情绪之间的联系,并对混杂因素进行了调整。结果:纳入508例儿童,平均(SD) =年龄4.54[1.04]岁。口腔内组患儿表现出更高的恐惧和张嘴困难,总体行为得分较低(mean [SD] = 16.64 [2.95] vs. 17.18 [3.06], B = -1.05, p)。结论:智能手机改善了行为,而口腔内相机更节省时间。设备的选择应平衡效率和孩子的舒适度。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06019884。
Children's Acceptance of Intraoral Cameras and Smartphones for Caries Detection: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Background: Teledentistry can improve access to care, but children's acceptance of different imaging techniques is underexplored.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess children's acceptance of intraoral cameras and smartphones for caries detection.
Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in rural Egyptian nurseries, with children aged ≤ 6 years randomized into intraoral camera or smartphone groups. Behavior during imaging was assessed using four indicators: fear, mouth-opening difficulty, opposition, and cooperation, with a total score calculated from their sum. Imaging time was recorded, and mood was assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Linear regression assessed associations between behavior and time with technique and mood, adjusting for confounders.
Results: The study included 508 children, mean (SD) = age 4.54 [1.04] years. Children in the intraoral group showed higher fear and difficulty keeping their mouths open, with lower overall behavior scores (mean [SD] = 16.64 [2.95] vs. 17.18 [3.06], B = -1.05, p < 0.001). The intraoral camera required less time (mean [SD] = 3.62 [1.49] vs. 5.33 [2.82] minutes, B = -1.56, p < 0.001). Positive mood improved behavior (B = 0.25, p < 0.001), while negative mood increased time (B = 0.30, p < 0.001) and worsened behavior (B = -0.64, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Smartphones improved behavior, while intraoral cameras were more time-efficient. Device choice should balance efficiency with child comfort.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide.
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.