女性her2阳性转移性乳腺癌预后模型的建立:一项基于人群的回顾性研究

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yan Chen, Yu Qiu, Haoyang Shen, Shuixin Yan, Jiadi Li, Weizhu Wu
{"title":"女性her2阳性转移性乳腺癌预后模型的建立:一项基于人群的回顾性研究","authors":"Yan Chen, Yu Qiu, Haoyang Shen, Shuixin Yan, Jiadi Li, Weizhu Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12905-024-03526-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to construct, evaluate, and validate nomograms for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) prediction in patients with HER2- overexpressing (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to select female patients diagnosed with HER2 + MBC between 2010 and 2015. These patients were distributed into training and validation groups (7:3 ratio). Variables were screened using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and BCSS and OS nomograms were constructed to determine one-, three-, and five-year survival probabilities. The nomograms were evaluated and validated using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Stratification was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests based on optimal total score cut-off values. We published web-based versions of these nomograms for clinical use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,151 eligible patients were randomized into training (n = 1,505) and validation (n = 646) groups. Independent prognostic factors of BCSS and OS included: age; marital status; race; oestrogen receptor status; surgery; chemotherapy; and bone, brain, liver, and lung metastases. The C-indices for the BCSS and OS training groups were 0.707 and 0.702, respectively. The ROC, calibration, and decision curves demonstrated the strength of the nomograms. According to cut-off values, patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with significant differences in survival outcomes between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We constructed predictive nomograms and stratified risk to assess the prognosis of patients with HER2 + MBC, which could help inform therapeutic decisions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of prognostic models for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in females: a retrospective population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Chen, Yu Qiu, Haoyang Shen, Shuixin Yan, Jiadi Li, Weizhu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-024-03526-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to construct, evaluate, and validate nomograms for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) prediction in patients with HER2- overexpressing (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to select female patients diagnosed with HER2 + MBC between 2010 and 2015. These patients were distributed into training and validation groups (7:3 ratio). Variables were screened using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and BCSS and OS nomograms were constructed to determine one-, three-, and five-year survival probabilities. The nomograms were evaluated and validated using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Stratification was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests based on optimal total score cut-off values. We published web-based versions of these nomograms for clinical use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,151 eligible patients were randomized into training (n = 1,505) and validation (n = 646) groups. Independent prognostic factors of BCSS and OS included: age; marital status; race; oestrogen receptor status; surgery; chemotherapy; and bone, brain, liver, and lung metastases. The C-indices for the BCSS and OS training groups were 0.707 and 0.702, respectively. The ROC, calibration, and decision curves demonstrated the strength of the nomograms. According to cut-off values, patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with significant differences in survival outcomes between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We constructed predictive nomograms and stratified risk to assess the prognosis of patients with HER2 + MBC, which could help inform therapeutic decisions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03526-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03526-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在构建、评估和验证用于预测HER2过表达(HER2+)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)和总生存(OS)的提名图:方法:利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库筛选出2010年至2015年间确诊为HER2+ MBC的女性患者。这些患者被分为训练组和验证组(比例为 7:3)。使用单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析筛选变量,并构建 BCSS 和 OS 直方图,以确定一年、三年和五年的生存概率。使用一致性指数(C-index)、随时间变化的接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析对提名图进行了评估和验证。根据最佳总分临界值,使用卡普兰-梅耶曲线和对数秩检验对分层进行了评估。我们发布了这些提名图的网络版,供临床使用:共有 2,151 名符合条件的患者被随机分为训练组(1,505 人)和验证组(646 人)。BCSS和OS的独立预后因素包括:年龄;婚姻状况;种族;雌激素受体状态;手术;化疗;骨、脑、肝和肺转移。BCSS 和 OS 训练组的 C 指数分别为 0.707 和 0.702。ROC、校准和决策曲线显示了提名图的优势。根据截断值,患者被分为低危、中危和高危组,它们之间的生存结果存在显著差异:我们构建了预测提名图并进行了风险分层,以评估 HER2 + MBC 患者的预后,这有助于为治疗决策提供依据:试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of prognostic models for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in females: a retrospective population-based study.

Background: This study aimed to construct, evaluate, and validate nomograms for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) prediction in patients with HER2- overexpressing (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to select female patients diagnosed with HER2 + MBC between 2010 and 2015. These patients were distributed into training and validation groups (7:3 ratio). Variables were screened using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and BCSS and OS nomograms were constructed to determine one-, three-, and five-year survival probabilities. The nomograms were evaluated and validated using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Stratification was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests based on optimal total score cut-off values. We published web-based versions of these nomograms for clinical use.

Results: A total of 2,151 eligible patients were randomized into training (n = 1,505) and validation (n = 646) groups. Independent prognostic factors of BCSS and OS included: age; marital status; race; oestrogen receptor status; surgery; chemotherapy; and bone, brain, liver, and lung metastases. The C-indices for the BCSS and OS training groups were 0.707 and 0.702, respectively. The ROC, calibration, and decision curves demonstrated the strength of the nomograms. According to cut-off values, patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with significant differences in survival outcomes between them.

Conclusion: We constructed predictive nomograms and stratified risk to assess the prognosis of patients with HER2 + MBC, which could help inform therapeutic decisions.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信