美国st段抬高型心肌梗死患者血管内成像与血管造影引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chayakrit Krittanawong, Song Peng Ang, Neil Sagar Maitra, Zhen Wang, Mahboob Alam, Hani Jneid, Samin Sharma
{"title":"美国st段抬高型心肌梗死患者血管内成像与血管造影引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较","authors":"Chayakrit Krittanawong, Song Peng Ang, Neil Sagar Maitra, Zhen Wang, Mahboob Alam, Hani Jneid, Samin Sharma","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) is still unclear in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI in the current second-generation DES era.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the trends and outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2021. The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints include trends of PCI hospitalizations, trends of mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were data for 819,645 hospitalizations for STEMI, of which 91.2% (n = 74,7860) utilized angiography-guided PCI, 8.4% (n = 68,985) utilized IVUS-guided PCI and 0.3% (n = 2800) utilized OCT-guided PCI. In-hospital mortality for IVUS-guided PCI was 4.6% (n = 3190) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography-guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.75 (0.68-0.81, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality for OCT-guided PCI was 3.4% (n = 95) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography-guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.67 (0.43-1.06, p = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVUS/OCT-guidance was increasingly utilized over the years and was associated with a significantly reduced adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality. Large-scale, long-term randomized data are needed to better ascertain where IVUS/OCT may be best utilized for optimization of PCI for STEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Chayakrit Krittanawong, Song Peng Ang, Neil Sagar Maitra, Zhen Wang, Mahboob Alam, Hani Jneid, Samin Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) is still unclear in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI in the current second-generation DES era.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the trends and outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2021. The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints include trends of PCI hospitalizations, trends of mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were data for 819,645 hospitalizations for STEMI, of which 91.2% (n = 74,7860) utilized angiography-guided PCI, 8.4% (n = 68,985) utilized IVUS-guided PCI and 0.3% (n = 2800) utilized OCT-guided PCI. In-hospital mortality for IVUS-guided PCI was 4.6% (n = 3190) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography-guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.75 (0.68-0.81, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality for OCT-guided PCI was 3.4% (n = 95) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography-guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.67 (0.43-1.06, p = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVUS/OCT-guidance was increasingly utilized over the years and was associated with a significantly reduced adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality. Large-scale, long-term randomized data are needed to better ascertain where IVUS/OCT may be best utilized for optimization of PCI for STEMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在当前第二代DES时代,血管内超声(IVUS)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)在STEMI患者行PCI中的作用尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估ivus引导下STEMI患者PCI治疗的趋势和结果。方法:我们使用2016年至2021年国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库。本研究的主要终点是全因住院死亡率。次要终点包括PCI住院趋势、死亡率趋势、住院时间和住院费用。结果:STEMI住院819,645例,其中91.2% (n = 74,7860)采用血管造影引导下PCI, 8.4% (n = 68,985)采用ivus引导下PCI, 0.3% (n = 2800)采用oct引导下PCI。IVUS引导下PCI的住院死亡率为4.6% (n = 3190),而血管造影引导下PCI的住院死亡率为6.0% (n = 44,935),调整后OR为0.75 (0.68-0.81,p)。结论:IVUS/ oct指导近年来越来越多地使用,并且与住院死亡率的调整后几率显著降低相关。需要大规模、长期的随机数据来更好地确定IVUS/OCT在STEMI PCI优化中的最佳应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States.

Background: The role of Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) is still unclear in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI in the current second-generation DES era.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the trends and outcomes of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with STEMI.

Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2021. The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints include trends of PCI hospitalizations, trends of mortality, length of stay, and cost of hospitalization.

Results: There were data for 819,645 hospitalizations for STEMI, of which 91.2% (n = 74,7860) utilized angiography-guided PCI, 8.4% (n = 68,985) utilized IVUS-guided PCI and 0.3% (n = 2800) utilized OCT-guided PCI. In-hospital mortality for IVUS-guided PCI was 4.6% (n = 3190) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography-guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.75 (0.68-0.81, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality for OCT-guided PCI was 3.4% (n = 95) versus 6.0% (n = 44,935) for angiography-guided PCI with an adjusted OR 0.67 (0.43-1.06, p = 0.09).

Conclusions: IVUS/OCT-guidance was increasingly utilized over the years and was associated with a significantly reduced adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality. Large-scale, long-term randomized data are needed to better ascertain where IVUS/OCT may be best utilized for optimization of PCI for STEMI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信