性别肯定干预对跨性别和性别多样化个体饮食失调诊断风险的影响

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Matthew Loria, Tomasz Tabernacki, Elad Fraiman, Jaime Perez, Jessica Abou Zeki, Julia Palozzi, Carly Goldblatt, Shubham Gupta, Kirtishri Mishra, Megan McNamara, Swagata Banik
{"title":"性别肯定干预对跨性别和性别多样化个体饮食失调诊断风险的影响","authors":"Matthew Loria, Tomasz Tabernacki, Elad Fraiman, Jaime Perez, Jessica Abou Zeki, Julia Palozzi, Carly Goldblatt, Shubham Gupta, Kirtishri Mishra, Megan McNamara, Swagata Banik","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00704-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to evaluate the risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals, specifically examining how this risk differs following gender-affirming medical therapy (GAMT). The study utilizes electronic medical record (EMR) data from the TriNetX database. A total of 90,955 TGD individuals were identified in the TriNetX database. TGD individuals were divided into cohorts according to gender-affirming interventions they received. To assess the risk of eating disorder diagnoses across groups, we applied a Cox proportional hazards model with gender-affirming care as a time-varying covariate. Here we show that transfeminine individuals receiving hormone therapy (HT) have a significantly higher likelihood of being diagnosed with an eating disorder compared to those without intervention (HR:1.67, 95% CI:1.41, 1.98). Conversely, transmasculine individuals on HT exhibit a reduced risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder relative to those without intervention (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.90). After undergoing gender-affirming medical therapy, the risk of eating disorder diagnosis increases for transfeminine individuals and decreases for transmasculine individuals. The observed differences in risk between transfeminine and transmasculine individuals on GAMT may be attributed to factors such as gendered societal norms, variations in screening practices, and the physiological effects of hormone therapy on eating disorder symptomatology. Further research is needed to clarify these influences and support tailored interventions. Loria, Tabernacki et al. investigate the risk of eating disorder diagnoses among transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Transfeminine individuals on hormone therapy are more likely to be diagnosed with eating disorders, while transmasculine individuals on hormone or surgical therapy are less likely to receive such diagnoses. Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals are at a higher risk of developing eating disorders, but the effects of gender-affirming interventions on this risk is not well known. Our study used data from nearly 91,000 TGD individuals to explore how hormone therapy and surgical transitioning might influence eating disorder diagnosis risk. We found that transfeminine individuals (those assigned male at birth who identify as female) on hormone therapy were more likely to be diagnosed with an eating disorder, while transmasculine individuals (those assigned female at birth who identify as male) on hormone therapy were less likely to receive such a diagnosis compared to TGD individuals not on hormone therapy. This difference in risk between transfeminine and transmasculine individuals may be explained by gendered societal norms, variations in screening practices, and the physiological effects of hormone therapy on eating disorder symptoms. Our findings highlight the need for supportive care and careful screening for eating disorders in TGD individuals receiving gender-affirming interventions.","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00704-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of gender-affirming interventions on eating disorder diagnosis risk among transgender and gender-diverse individuals\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Loria, Tomasz Tabernacki, Elad Fraiman, Jaime Perez, Jessica Abou Zeki, Julia Palozzi, Carly Goldblatt, Shubham Gupta, Kirtishri Mishra, Megan McNamara, Swagata Banik\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-024-00704-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to evaluate the risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals, specifically examining how this risk differs following gender-affirming medical therapy (GAMT). The study utilizes electronic medical record (EMR) data from the TriNetX database. A total of 90,955 TGD individuals were identified in the TriNetX database. TGD individuals were divided into cohorts according to gender-affirming interventions they received. To assess the risk of eating disorder diagnoses across groups, we applied a Cox proportional hazards model with gender-affirming care as a time-varying covariate. Here we show that transfeminine individuals receiving hormone therapy (HT) have a significantly higher likelihood of being diagnosed with an eating disorder compared to those without intervention (HR:1.67, 95% CI:1.41, 1.98). Conversely, transmasculine individuals on HT exhibit a reduced risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder relative to those without intervention (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.90). After undergoing gender-affirming medical therapy, the risk of eating disorder diagnosis increases for transfeminine individuals and decreases for transmasculine individuals. The observed differences in risk between transfeminine and transmasculine individuals on GAMT may be attributed to factors such as gendered societal norms, variations in screening practices, and the physiological effects of hormone therapy on eating disorder symptomatology. Further research is needed to clarify these influences and support tailored interventions. Loria, Tabernacki et al. investigate the risk of eating disorder diagnoses among transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Transfeminine individuals on hormone therapy are more likely to be diagnosed with eating disorders, while transmasculine individuals on hormone or surgical therapy are less likely to receive such diagnoses. Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals are at a higher risk of developing eating disorders, but the effects of gender-affirming interventions on this risk is not well known. Our study used data from nearly 91,000 TGD individuals to explore how hormone therapy and surgical transitioning might influence eating disorder diagnosis risk. We found that transfeminine individuals (those assigned male at birth who identify as female) on hormone therapy were more likely to be diagnosed with an eating disorder, while transmasculine individuals (those assigned female at birth who identify as male) on hormone therapy were less likely to receive such a diagnosis compared to TGD individuals not on hormone therapy. This difference in risk between transfeminine and transmasculine individuals may be explained by gendered societal norms, variations in screening practices, and the physiological effects of hormone therapy on eating disorder symptoms. Our findings highlight the need for supportive care and careful screening for eating disorders in TGD individuals receiving gender-affirming interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00704-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00704-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00704-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)个体被诊断患有饮食失调的风险,特别是检查性别肯定医学治疗(GAMT)后这种风险的差异。该研究利用了来自TriNetX数据库的电子病历(EMR)数据。TriNetX数据库共鉴定出90,955个TGD个体。根据他们接受的性别肯定干预措施,TGD个体被分成队列。为了评估各组饮食失调诊断的风险,我们应用了Cox比例风险模型,并将性别确认护理作为时变协变量。在这里,我们发现接受激素治疗(HT)的跨性别个体被诊断为饮食失调的可能性明显高于未接受干预的个体(HR:1.67, 95% CI:1.41, 1.98)。相反,与未进行干预的个体相比,接受HT治疗的跨性别个体被诊断为饮食失调的风险较低(HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.90)。在接受性别确认医学治疗后,跨女性个体被诊断为饮食失调的风险增加,而跨男性个体被诊断为饮食失调的风险降低。观察到的跨女性和跨男性个体在GAMT上的风险差异可能归因于性别社会规范、筛查实践的差异以及激素治疗对饮食失调症状学的生理影响等因素。需要进一步的研究来澄清这些影响并支持有针对性的干预措施。Loria, Tabernacki等人调查了跨性别和性别多样化个体中饮食失调诊断的风险。接受激素治疗的变性人更有可能被诊断为饮食失调,而接受激素或手术治疗的变性人则不太可能被诊断为饮食失调。跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)个体患饮食失调的风险更高,但性别肯定干预措施对这一风险的影响尚不清楚。我们的研究使用了近91,000名TGD患者的数据来探索激素治疗和手术过渡如何影响饮食失调的诊断风险。我们发现,接受激素治疗的跨性别个体(出生时被指定为男性,但自认为是女性)更有可能被诊断为饮食失调,而接受激素治疗的跨性别个体(出生时被指定为女性,但自认为是男性)与未接受激素治疗的TGD个体相比,接受激素治疗的跨性别个体(出生时被指定为女性,但自认为是男性)接受这种诊断的可能性更小。跨性别者和跨性别者之间的风险差异可以用性别社会规范、筛查方法的差异以及激素治疗对饮食失调症状的生理影响来解释。我们的研究结果强调了在接受性别肯定干预的TGD个体中需要支持性护理和仔细筛查饮食失调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The impact of gender-affirming interventions on eating disorder diagnosis risk among transgender and gender-diverse individuals

The impact of gender-affirming interventions on eating disorder diagnosis risk among transgender and gender-diverse individuals
The objective of this study is to evaluate the risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals, specifically examining how this risk differs following gender-affirming medical therapy (GAMT). The study utilizes electronic medical record (EMR) data from the TriNetX database. A total of 90,955 TGD individuals were identified in the TriNetX database. TGD individuals were divided into cohorts according to gender-affirming interventions they received. To assess the risk of eating disorder diagnoses across groups, we applied a Cox proportional hazards model with gender-affirming care as a time-varying covariate. Here we show that transfeminine individuals receiving hormone therapy (HT) have a significantly higher likelihood of being diagnosed with an eating disorder compared to those without intervention (HR:1.67, 95% CI:1.41, 1.98). Conversely, transmasculine individuals on HT exhibit a reduced risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder relative to those without intervention (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.90). After undergoing gender-affirming medical therapy, the risk of eating disorder diagnosis increases for transfeminine individuals and decreases for transmasculine individuals. The observed differences in risk between transfeminine and transmasculine individuals on GAMT may be attributed to factors such as gendered societal norms, variations in screening practices, and the physiological effects of hormone therapy on eating disorder symptomatology. Further research is needed to clarify these influences and support tailored interventions. Loria, Tabernacki et al. investigate the risk of eating disorder diagnoses among transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Transfeminine individuals on hormone therapy are more likely to be diagnosed with eating disorders, while transmasculine individuals on hormone or surgical therapy are less likely to receive such diagnoses. Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals are at a higher risk of developing eating disorders, but the effects of gender-affirming interventions on this risk is not well known. Our study used data from nearly 91,000 TGD individuals to explore how hormone therapy and surgical transitioning might influence eating disorder diagnosis risk. We found that transfeminine individuals (those assigned male at birth who identify as female) on hormone therapy were more likely to be diagnosed with an eating disorder, while transmasculine individuals (those assigned female at birth who identify as male) on hormone therapy were less likely to receive such a diagnosis compared to TGD individuals not on hormone therapy. This difference in risk between transfeminine and transmasculine individuals may be explained by gendered societal norms, variations in screening practices, and the physiological effects of hormone therapy on eating disorder symptoms. Our findings highlight the need for supportive care and careful screening for eating disorders in TGD individuals receiving gender-affirming interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信