R. Stigter, D. Fiscaletti, G. E. Elsinga, T. van Terwisga, J. Westerweel
{"title":"微泡尺寸和浓度测量中改进的校准方法和不确定度评定","authors":"R. Stigter, D. Fiscaletti, G. E. Elsinga, T. van Terwisga, J. Westerweel","doi":"10.1007/s00348-024-03929-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Interferometric particle imaging (IPI) is used to measure both the size distribution and concentration of microbubbles (with a diameter less than 100 micron) in water. Using a new method for calibration makes it possible to obtain quantitative results for the concentration of microbubbles. The results are validated using imaging with a long-range microscope shadowgraph (LMS). Estimates of the size distribution and concentration from both IPI and LMS agree within uncertainty limits. The relative uncertainty in the IPI concentration estimation is about 10% and is mostly due to the finite number of detected bubbles. It is shown that the performance of the bubble-image detection algorithm needs to be quantified to obtain a reliable estimate of the concentration obtained with IPI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":554,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Fluids","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00348-024-03929-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved calibration methodology and uncertainty assessment in measurements of microbubble size and concentration\",\"authors\":\"R. Stigter, D. Fiscaletti, G. E. Elsinga, T. van Terwisga, J. Westerweel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00348-024-03929-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Interferometric particle imaging (IPI) is used to measure both the size distribution and concentration of microbubbles (with a diameter less than 100 micron) in water. Using a new method for calibration makes it possible to obtain quantitative results for the concentration of microbubbles. The results are validated using imaging with a long-range microscope shadowgraph (LMS). Estimates of the size distribution and concentration from both IPI and LMS agree within uncertainty limits. The relative uncertainty in the IPI concentration estimation is about 10% and is mostly due to the finite number of detected bubbles. It is shown that the performance of the bubble-image detection algorithm needs to be quantified to obtain a reliable estimate of the concentration obtained with IPI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experiments in Fluids\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00348-024-03929-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experiments in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-024-03929-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-024-03929-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
An improved calibration methodology and uncertainty assessment in measurements of microbubble size and concentration
Interferometric particle imaging (IPI) is used to measure both the size distribution and concentration of microbubbles (with a diameter less than 100 micron) in water. Using a new method for calibration makes it possible to obtain quantitative results for the concentration of microbubbles. The results are validated using imaging with a long-range microscope shadowgraph (LMS). Estimates of the size distribution and concentration from both IPI and LMS agree within uncertainty limits. The relative uncertainty in the IPI concentration estimation is about 10% and is mostly due to the finite number of detected bubbles. It is shown that the performance of the bubble-image detection algorithm needs to be quantified to obtain a reliable estimate of the concentration obtained with IPI.
期刊介绍:
Experiments in Fluids examines the advancement, extension, and improvement of new techniques of flow measurement. The journal also publishes contributions that employ existing experimental techniques to gain an understanding of the underlying flow physics in the areas of turbulence, aerodynamics, hydrodynamics, convective heat transfer, combustion, turbomachinery, multi-phase flows, and chemical, biological and geological flows. In addition, readers will find papers that report on investigations combining experimental and analytical/numerical approaches.