能源安全是环境难题中缺失的一块吗?来自负荷能力因子和生态足迹指标的新证据

IF 7.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tunahan Degirmenci, Oguzhan Bozatli, Mucahit Aydin, Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente
{"title":"能源安全是环境难题中缺失的一块吗?来自负荷能力因子和生态足迹指标的新证据","authors":"Tunahan Degirmenci, Oguzhan Bozatli, Mucahit Aydin, Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente","doi":"10.1016/j.gr.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite their great potential, low-carbon energies can be used in limited amounts. Energy R&D expenditures can ensure that low-carbon energies are used at a rate close to their potential by increasing energy efficiency and reducing losses during the production and consumption phases. The positive environmental impacts of low-carbon energy and energy R&D expenditures can be accelerated by political globalization. As an example of political globalization, the Kyoto Protocol has enabled the adoption of clean technologies and low-carbon energies by providing various obligations to many countries, especially developed countries. Although some countries have withdrawn from the obligations embodied in the protocol, they are taking measures to ensure environmental sustainability through individual efforts in their own interests. The USA is the example that best reflects this. The environmental impact of energy security may vary depending on the energy sources that provide affordable and accessible energy. This study examines the effects of energy R&D expenditures, political globalization, energy security, and low-carbon energy consumption on the USA’s load capacity factor and ecological footprint from 1980 to 2018 using Fourier-based FMOLS and CCR estimators. The robust results of this study show that low-carbon energy consumption, energy technology R&D expenditures, and political globalization increase environmental sustainability. Policymakers should allocate more resources to developing low-carbon energy sources, increasing energy efficiency, and encouraging the adoption of clean energy technologies.","PeriodicalId":12761,"journal":{"name":"Gondwana Research","volume":"352 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is energy security the missing piece of the environmental puzzle? Fresh evidence from load capacity factor and ecological footprint indicators\",\"authors\":\"Tunahan Degirmenci, Oguzhan Bozatli, Mucahit Aydin, Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gr.2024.11.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite their great potential, low-carbon energies can be used in limited amounts. Energy R&D expenditures can ensure that low-carbon energies are used at a rate close to their potential by increasing energy efficiency and reducing losses during the production and consumption phases. The positive environmental impacts of low-carbon energy and energy R&D expenditures can be accelerated by political globalization. As an example of political globalization, the Kyoto Protocol has enabled the adoption of clean technologies and low-carbon energies by providing various obligations to many countries, especially developed countries. Although some countries have withdrawn from the obligations embodied in the protocol, they are taking measures to ensure environmental sustainability through individual efforts in their own interests. The USA is the example that best reflects this. The environmental impact of energy security may vary depending on the energy sources that provide affordable and accessible energy. This study examines the effects of energy R&D expenditures, political globalization, energy security, and low-carbon energy consumption on the USA’s load capacity factor and ecological footprint from 1980 to 2018 using Fourier-based FMOLS and CCR estimators. The robust results of this study show that low-carbon energy consumption, energy technology R&D expenditures, and political globalization increase environmental sustainability. Policymakers should allocate more resources to developing low-carbon energy sources, increasing energy efficiency, and encouraging the adoption of clean energy technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"volume\":\"352 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.11.015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gondwana Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.11.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管低碳能源潜力巨大,但其使用量有限。能源研发支出可以通过提高能源效率和减少生产和消费阶段的损失,确保以接近其潜力的速度使用低碳能源。政治全球化可以加速低碳能源和能源研发支出的积极环境影响。作为政治全球化的一个例子,《京都议定书》通过向许多国家,特别是发达国家提供各种义务,使清洁技术和低碳能源的采用成为可能。虽然一些国家已经退出了议定书所载的义务,但它们正在采取措施,通过个别的努力,为自己的利益确保环境的可持续性。美国是最能反映这一点的例子。能源安全对环境的影响可能因提供可负担和可获得能源的能源来源而异。本研究采用基于傅立叶的FMOLS和CCR估计,考察了1980 - 2018年能源研发支出、政治全球化、能源安全和低碳能源消费对美国负荷能力因子和生态足迹的影响。本研究的有力结果表明,低碳能源消费、能源技术研发支出和政治全球化提高了环境可持续性。政策制定者应该将更多的资源用于开发低碳能源、提高能源效率和鼓励采用清洁能源技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is energy security the missing piece of the environmental puzzle? Fresh evidence from load capacity factor and ecological footprint indicators
Despite their great potential, low-carbon energies can be used in limited amounts. Energy R&D expenditures can ensure that low-carbon energies are used at a rate close to their potential by increasing energy efficiency and reducing losses during the production and consumption phases. The positive environmental impacts of low-carbon energy and energy R&D expenditures can be accelerated by political globalization. As an example of political globalization, the Kyoto Protocol has enabled the adoption of clean technologies and low-carbon energies by providing various obligations to many countries, especially developed countries. Although some countries have withdrawn from the obligations embodied in the protocol, they are taking measures to ensure environmental sustainability through individual efforts in their own interests. The USA is the example that best reflects this. The environmental impact of energy security may vary depending on the energy sources that provide affordable and accessible energy. This study examines the effects of energy R&D expenditures, political globalization, energy security, and low-carbon energy consumption on the USA’s load capacity factor and ecological footprint from 1980 to 2018 using Fourier-based FMOLS and CCR estimators. The robust results of this study show that low-carbon energy consumption, energy technology R&D expenditures, and political globalization increase environmental sustainability. Policymakers should allocate more resources to developing low-carbon energy sources, increasing energy efficiency, and encouraging the adoption of clean energy technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gondwana Research
Gondwana Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
298
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Gondwana Research (GR) is an International Journal aimed to promote high quality research publications on all topics related to solid Earth, particularly with reference to the origin and evolution of continents, continental assemblies and their resources. GR is an "all earth science" journal with no restrictions on geological time, terrane or theme and covers a wide spectrum of topics in geosciences such as geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, structure, petrology, geochemistry, stable isotopes, geochronology, economic geology, exploration geology, engineering geology, geophysics, and environmental geology among other themes, and provides an appropriate forum to integrate studies from different disciplines and different terrains. In addition to regular articles and thematic issues, the journal invites high profile state-of-the-art reviews on thrust area topics for its column, ''GR FOCUS''. Focus articles include short biographies and photographs of the authors. Short articles (within ten printed pages) for rapid publication reporting important discoveries or innovative models of global interest will be considered under the category ''GR LETTERS''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信