Max F. Czapanskiy, Lina M. Arcila Hernández, Cara Munro, Isabella Garfield, Adrien Bastidas, Allison R. Payne, Kelli Ong, Natalie A. Storm, Taiki Adachi, Conner M. Hale, Astarte Brown, Patrick W. Robinson, Madeleine Stewart, Salma T. Abdel-Raheem, Erika Zavaleta, Roxanne S. Beltran
{"title":"长期的学习应该为全纳教育和专业发展提供结构","authors":"Max F. Czapanskiy, Lina M. Arcila Hernández, Cara Munro, Isabella Garfield, Adrien Bastidas, Allison R. Payne, Kelli Ong, Natalie A. Storm, Taiki Adachi, Conner M. Hale, Astarte Brown, Patrick W. Robinson, Madeleine Stewart, Salma T. Abdel-Raheem, Erika Zavaleta, Roxanne S. Beltran","doi":"10.1111/ele.14482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Long-term studies are critical for ecological understanding, but they are underutilized as inclusive opportunities for training ecologists. We use our perspective from the Año Nuevo elephant seal programme along with surveys from community members to propose that long-term studies could be better leveraged to promote inclusive education and professional development in ecology. Drawing on our experiences as mentors and mentees, we demonstrate how long-term studies can use their resources, including <i>rich data</i>, <i>robust logistics</i> and <i>extensive professional networks</i>, to improve recruitment and retention of diverse groups of trainees. However, practices such as unpaid labour and unclear expectations limit the utility of these resources for diversifying ecology. We discuss how we have structured our long-term study to create more inclusive and equitable training opportunities. Acknowledging these transformations required substantial resources, we highlight funding sources and organizational partnerships that can promote investment in long-term studies for broadening participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"27 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14482","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term studies should provide structure for inclusive education and professional development\",\"authors\":\"Max F. Czapanskiy, Lina M. Arcila Hernández, Cara Munro, Isabella Garfield, Adrien Bastidas, Allison R. Payne, Kelli Ong, Natalie A. Storm, Taiki Adachi, Conner M. Hale, Astarte Brown, Patrick W. Robinson, Madeleine Stewart, Salma T. Abdel-Raheem, Erika Zavaleta, Roxanne S. Beltran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.14482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Long-term studies are critical for ecological understanding, but they are underutilized as inclusive opportunities for training ecologists. We use our perspective from the Año Nuevo elephant seal programme along with surveys from community members to propose that long-term studies could be better leveraged to promote inclusive education and professional development in ecology. Drawing on our experiences as mentors and mentees, we demonstrate how long-term studies can use their resources, including <i>rich data</i>, <i>robust logistics</i> and <i>extensive professional networks</i>, to improve recruitment and retention of diverse groups of trainees. However, practices such as unpaid labour and unclear expectations limit the utility of these resources for diversifying ecology. We discuss how we have structured our long-term study to create more inclusive and equitable training opportunities. Acknowledging these transformations required substantial resources, we highlight funding sources and organizational partnerships that can promote investment in long-term studies for broadening participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14482\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14482\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term studies should provide structure for inclusive education and professional development
Long-term studies are critical for ecological understanding, but they are underutilized as inclusive opportunities for training ecologists. We use our perspective from the Año Nuevo elephant seal programme along with surveys from community members to propose that long-term studies could be better leveraged to promote inclusive education and professional development in ecology. Drawing on our experiences as mentors and mentees, we demonstrate how long-term studies can use their resources, including rich data, robust logistics and extensive professional networks, to improve recruitment and retention of diverse groups of trainees. However, practices such as unpaid labour and unclear expectations limit the utility of these resources for diversifying ecology. We discuss how we have structured our long-term study to create more inclusive and equitable training opportunities. Acknowledging these transformations required substantial resources, we highlight funding sources and organizational partnerships that can promote investment in long-term studies for broadening participation.
期刊介绍:
Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.