长期的学习应该为全纳教育和专业发展提供结构

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1111/ele.14482
Max F. Czapanskiy, Lina M. Arcila Hernández, Cara Munro, Isabella Garfield, Adrien Bastidas, Allison R. Payne, Kelli Ong, Natalie A. Storm, Taiki Adachi, Conner M. Hale, Astarte Brown, Patrick W. Robinson, Madeleine Stewart, Salma T. Abdel-Raheem, Erika Zavaleta, Roxanne S. Beltran
{"title":"长期的学习应该为全纳教育和专业发展提供结构","authors":"Max F. Czapanskiy,&nbsp;Lina M. Arcila Hernández,&nbsp;Cara Munro,&nbsp;Isabella Garfield,&nbsp;Adrien Bastidas,&nbsp;Allison R. Payne,&nbsp;Kelli Ong,&nbsp;Natalie A. Storm,&nbsp;Taiki Adachi,&nbsp;Conner M. Hale,&nbsp;Astarte Brown,&nbsp;Patrick W. Robinson,&nbsp;Madeleine Stewart,&nbsp;Salma T. Abdel-Raheem,&nbsp;Erika Zavaleta,&nbsp;Roxanne S. Beltran","doi":"10.1111/ele.14482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Long-term studies are critical for ecological understanding, but they are underutilized as inclusive opportunities for training ecologists. We use our perspective from the Año Nuevo elephant seal programme along with surveys from community members to propose that long-term studies could be better leveraged to promote inclusive education and professional development in ecology. Drawing on our experiences as mentors and mentees, we demonstrate how long-term studies can use their resources, including <i>rich data</i>, <i>robust logistics</i> and <i>extensive professional networks</i>, to improve recruitment and retention of diverse groups of trainees. However, practices such as unpaid labour and unclear expectations limit the utility of these resources for diversifying ecology. We discuss how we have structured our long-term study to create more inclusive and equitable training opportunities. Acknowledging these transformations required substantial resources, we highlight funding sources and organizational partnerships that can promote investment in long-term studies for broadening participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"27 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14482","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term studies should provide structure for inclusive education and professional development\",\"authors\":\"Max F. Czapanskiy,&nbsp;Lina M. Arcila Hernández,&nbsp;Cara Munro,&nbsp;Isabella Garfield,&nbsp;Adrien Bastidas,&nbsp;Allison R. Payne,&nbsp;Kelli Ong,&nbsp;Natalie A. Storm,&nbsp;Taiki Adachi,&nbsp;Conner M. Hale,&nbsp;Astarte Brown,&nbsp;Patrick W. Robinson,&nbsp;Madeleine Stewart,&nbsp;Salma T. Abdel-Raheem,&nbsp;Erika Zavaleta,&nbsp;Roxanne S. Beltran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.14482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Long-term studies are critical for ecological understanding, but they are underutilized as inclusive opportunities for training ecologists. We use our perspective from the Año Nuevo elephant seal programme along with surveys from community members to propose that long-term studies could be better leveraged to promote inclusive education and professional development in ecology. Drawing on our experiences as mentors and mentees, we demonstrate how long-term studies can use their resources, including <i>rich data</i>, <i>robust logistics</i> and <i>extensive professional networks</i>, to improve recruitment and retention of diverse groups of trainees. However, practices such as unpaid labour and unclear expectations limit the utility of these resources for diversifying ecology. We discuss how we have structured our long-term study to create more inclusive and equitable training opportunities. Acknowledging these transformations required substantial resources, we highlight funding sources and organizational partnerships that can promote investment in long-term studies for broadening participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"27 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14482\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14482\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期研究对生态理解至关重要,但作为培训生态学家的包容性机会,它们没有得到充分利用。我们从Año Nuevo象海豹项目的角度出发,结合社区成员的调查,提出可以更好地利用长期研究来促进包容性教育和生态学专业发展。根据我们作为导师和学员的经验,我们展示了长期研究如何利用他们的资源,包括丰富的数据、健全的物流和广泛的专业网络,来改善招聘和留住不同群体的学员。然而,诸如无偿劳动和不明确的期望等做法限制了这些资源对生态多样化的利用。我们讨论了我们如何组织我们的长期学习,以创造更包容和公平的培训机会。认识到这些转变需要大量资源,我们强调了可以促进长期研究投资以扩大参与的资金来源和组织伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-term studies should provide structure for inclusive education and professional development

Long-term studies should provide structure for inclusive education and professional development

Long-term studies are critical for ecological understanding, but they are underutilized as inclusive opportunities for training ecologists. We use our perspective from the Año Nuevo elephant seal programme along with surveys from community members to propose that long-term studies could be better leveraged to promote inclusive education and professional development in ecology. Drawing on our experiences as mentors and mentees, we demonstrate how long-term studies can use their resources, including rich data, robust logistics and extensive professional networks, to improve recruitment and retention of diverse groups of trainees. However, practices such as unpaid labour and unclear expectations limit the utility of these resources for diversifying ecology. We discuss how we have structured our long-term study to create more inclusive and equitable training opportunities. Acknowledging these transformations required substantial resources, we highlight funding sources and organizational partnerships that can promote investment in long-term studies for broadening participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信