Arinze Duke George Nwosu, Edmund Ndudi Ossai, Chijioke Ejezie, Odichimma Callista Obodo
{"title":"教育干预可改善导气气囊触诊法监测气管套管压力的实验研究。","authors":"Arinze Duke George Nwosu, Edmund Ndudi Ossai, Chijioke Ejezie, Odichimma Callista Obodo","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_162_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considerable morbidity is attributable to inappropriate tracheal cuff pressure. An earlier study undertaken in our hospital revealed that a normal cuff pressure of 20-30 cm H<sub>2</sub>O was achieved in only 6% of intubated patients using subjective estimation methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a training intervention could improve the accuracy of the subjective estimation method in our tracheal cuff monitoring.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 1-day training session was conducted in April 2022 for our anaesthesia providers. The cuffs of different sizes of endotracheal tubes were inflated to 25 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, and each staff was requested to feel the turgor of the pilot balloon. Subsequently, anaesthesia providers used pilot balloon palpation for the regulation of the tracheal cuff pressure in consecutive patients undergoing general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. During each intubation, a manometer was used to crosscheck the inflated cuff pressure objectively. The incidence of post-operative sore throat was also evaluated. The obtained outcomes were compared with pre-intervention data obtained from an earlier study conducted in the health facility from October 2020 to September 2021. Significant differences were considered when <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tracheal cuff pressure was improved post-intervention (49.2 ± 24.1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O versus 77.1 ± 31.1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O; <i>P</i> < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of tracheal cuffs (20%; 31/156) were inflated within the normal range compared to 6% (9/141) prior to the intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.003). Fewer patients developed post-operative sore throat following the educational intervention (32.8%; 41/125) versus pre-intervention (47.7%; 53/111; <i>P</i> = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The educational intervention improved the safety of tracheal cuff management, which could positively impact airway management, especially in poor resource settings without cuff manometers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":"15 1","pages":"53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Intervention Can Improve the Pilot Balloon Palpation Method of Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressure Monitoring: An Experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Arinze Duke George Nwosu, Edmund Ndudi Ossai, Chijioke Ejezie, Odichimma Callista Obodo\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jwas.jwas_162_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considerable morbidity is attributable to inappropriate tracheal cuff pressure. An earlier study undertaken in our hospital revealed that a normal cuff pressure of 20-30 cm H<sub>2</sub>O was achieved in only 6% of intubated patients using subjective estimation methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a training intervention could improve the accuracy of the subjective estimation method in our tracheal cuff monitoring.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 1-day training session was conducted in April 2022 for our anaesthesia providers. The cuffs of different sizes of endotracheal tubes were inflated to 25 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, and each staff was requested to feel the turgor of the pilot balloon. Subsequently, anaesthesia providers used pilot balloon palpation for the regulation of the tracheal cuff pressure in consecutive patients undergoing general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. During each intubation, a manometer was used to crosscheck the inflated cuff pressure objectively. The incidence of post-operative sore throat was also evaluated. The obtained outcomes were compared with pre-intervention data obtained from an earlier study conducted in the health facility from October 2020 to September 2021. Significant differences were considered when <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tracheal cuff pressure was improved post-intervention (49.2 ± 24.1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O versus 77.1 ± 31.1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O; <i>P</i> < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of tracheal cuffs (20%; 31/156) were inflated within the normal range compared to 6% (9/141) prior to the intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.003). Fewer patients developed post-operative sore throat following the educational intervention (32.8%; 41/125) versus pre-intervention (47.7%; 53/111; <i>P</i> = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The educational intervention improved the safety of tracheal cuff management, which could positively impact airway management, especially in poor resource settings without cuff manometers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"53-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676018/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_162_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_162_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:相当多的发病率可归因于不适当的气管袖套压力。早期在我院进行的一项研究表明,使用主观估计方法,只有6%的插管患者实现了20-30 cm H2O的正常袖带压力。目的:探讨训练干预能否提高主观估计方法在气管袖带监测中的准确性。材料和方法:于2022年4月对我们的麻醉提供者进行了为期1天的培训。将不同尺寸的气管插管袖口充气至25 cm H2O,并要求每位工作人员感受导气气球的膨胀。随后,麻醉提供者在连续接受气管插管全麻患者中使用导航球囊触诊来调节气管袖压。每次插管时,使用血压计客观地交叉检查充气后的袖带压力。术后喉咙痛的发生率也进行了评估。将获得的结果与从2020年10月至2021年9月在该卫生机构进行的早期研究获得的干预前数据进行比较。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:干预后平均气管袖压有所改善(49.2±24.1 cm H2O vs 77.1±31.1 cm H2O;P < 0.001)。气管袖口的比例明显较高(20%;31/156)在正常范围内膨胀,而干预前为6% (9/141)(P = 0.003)。教育干预后出现术后喉咙痛的患者较少(32.8%;41/125)与干预前相比(47.7%;53/111;P = 0.019)。结论:教育干预提高了气管袖带管理的安全性,对气道管理有积极的影响,特别是在资源贫乏、没有袖带血压计的情况下。
Educational Intervention Can Improve the Pilot Balloon Palpation Method of Tracheal Tube Cuff Pressure Monitoring: An Experimental Study.
Background: Considerable morbidity is attributable to inappropriate tracheal cuff pressure. An earlier study undertaken in our hospital revealed that a normal cuff pressure of 20-30 cm H2O was achieved in only 6% of intubated patients using subjective estimation methods.
Objective: To determine whether a training intervention could improve the accuracy of the subjective estimation method in our tracheal cuff monitoring.
Materials and methods: A 1-day training session was conducted in April 2022 for our anaesthesia providers. The cuffs of different sizes of endotracheal tubes were inflated to 25 cm H2O, and each staff was requested to feel the turgor of the pilot balloon. Subsequently, anaesthesia providers used pilot balloon palpation for the regulation of the tracheal cuff pressure in consecutive patients undergoing general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. During each intubation, a manometer was used to crosscheck the inflated cuff pressure objectively. The incidence of post-operative sore throat was also evaluated. The obtained outcomes were compared with pre-intervention data obtained from an earlier study conducted in the health facility from October 2020 to September 2021. Significant differences were considered when P < 0.05.
Results: The mean tracheal cuff pressure was improved post-intervention (49.2 ± 24.1 cm H2O versus 77.1 ± 31.1 cm H2O; P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of tracheal cuffs (20%; 31/156) were inflated within the normal range compared to 6% (9/141) prior to the intervention (P = 0.003). Fewer patients developed post-operative sore throat following the educational intervention (32.8%; 41/125) versus pre-intervention (47.7%; 53/111; P = 0.019).
Conclusion: The educational intervention improved the safety of tracheal cuff management, which could positively impact airway management, especially in poor resource settings without cuff manometers.