韩国版国防和退伍军人疼痛评定量表用于评估术后疼痛的有效性:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Korean Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.3344/kjp.24346
Seungeun Choi, Taeyup Kim, Hae Kyeong Yoo, Sang-Youn Park, Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
{"title":"韩国版国防和退伍军人疼痛评定量表用于评估术后疼痛的有效性:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。","authors":"Seungeun Choi, Taeyup Kim, Hae Kyeong Yoo, Sang-Youn Park, Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee","doi":"10.3344/kjp.24346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The defense and veterans pain rating scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool combining a numerical rating scale (NRS) with descriptive words, colors, and facial expressions. This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the DVPRS (K-DVPRS) for postoperative pain assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic abdominal surgery. The original DVPRS was translated into Korean using a forward-backward method. Pain intensities at rest and during coughing were assessed at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively using the NRS and K-DVPRS, respectively. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was also used. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the K-DVPRS were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 174 patients screened, 150 were enrolled, and 148 completed the study. The K-DVPRS had strong convergent validity with the NRS at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (ρ: 0.75 to 0.78, all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Construct validity was confirmed by significant differences in pain scores based on surgical extent and duration. The internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha: 0.77 and 0.85 at 24 and 48 hours, respectively), and test-retest reliability at 24 hours was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.90 at rest and 0.95 during coughing). Responsiveness, measured by Cliff's effect size, was high from preoperative to 24 hours postoperatively and moderate from 24 to 48 hours. At 48 hours, the K-DVPRS had stronger correlations with the EQ-5D-5L index and EQVAS than with the NRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-DVPRS is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for assessing postoperative pain in Korean patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"58-68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Korean version of defense and veterans pain rating scale for assessment of postoperative pain: a prospective observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Seungeun Choi, Taeyup Kim, Hae Kyeong Yoo, Sang-Youn Park, Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3344/kjp.24346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The defense and veterans pain rating scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool combining a numerical rating scale (NRS) with descriptive words, colors, and facial expressions. This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the DVPRS (K-DVPRS) for postoperative pain assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic abdominal surgery. The original DVPRS was translated into Korean using a forward-backward method. Pain intensities at rest and during coughing were assessed at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively using the NRS and K-DVPRS, respectively. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was also used. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the K-DVPRS were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 174 patients screened, 150 were enrolled, and 148 completed the study. The K-DVPRS had strong convergent validity with the NRS at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (ρ: 0.75 to 0.78, all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Construct validity was confirmed by significant differences in pain scores based on surgical extent and duration. The internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha: 0.77 and 0.85 at 24 and 48 hours, respectively), and test-retest reliability at 24 hours was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.90 at rest and 0.95 during coughing). Responsiveness, measured by Cliff's effect size, was high from preoperative to 24 hours postoperatively and moderate from 24 to 48 hours. At 48 hours, the K-DVPRS had stronger correlations with the EQ-5D-5L index and EQVAS than with the NRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-DVPRS is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for assessing postoperative pain in Korean patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"58-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695251/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.24346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.24346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍国防和退伍军人疼痛评分量表(DVPRS)是一种疼痛评估工具,它将数字评分量表(NRS)与描述性词汇、颜色和面部表情相结合。本研究旨在验证用于术后疼痛评估的韩文版 DVPRS(K-DVPRS):本研究纳入了接受择期腹腔镜或机器人腹部手术的患者。方法:该研究纳入了接受择期腹腔镜或机器人腹部手术的患者,采用正向-反向法将原始 DVPRS 翻译成韩文。分别在术后 24 小时和 48 小时使用 NRS 和 K-DVPRS 评估休息时和咳嗽时的疼痛强度。此外,还使用了 EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) 问卷。对 K-DVPRS 的有效性、可靠性和响应性进行了评估:结果:在筛选出的 174 名患者中,150 人被纳入研究,148 人完成了研究。术后 24 小时和 48 小时,K-DVPRS 与 NRS 具有很强的收敛效度(ρ:0.75 至 0.78,所有 P <0.001)。基于手术范围和持续时间的疼痛评分差异显著,证实了结构有效性。内部一致性是可以接受的(24 小时和 48 小时时的 Cronbach's alpha 分别为 0.77 和 0.85),24 小时时的测试-再测可靠性极佳(静息时的类内相关系数为 0.90,咳嗽时的类内相关系数为 0.95)。根据克利夫效应大小衡量,术前至术后 24 小时的反应性较高,24 至 48 小时的反应性适中。48 小时后,K-DVPRS 与 EQ-5D-5L 指数和 EQVAS 的相关性强于 NRS:结论:K-DVPRS 是评估韩国患者术后疼痛的有效、可靠和反应灵敏的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Korean version of defense and veterans pain rating scale for assessment of postoperative pain: a prospective observational cohort study.

Background: The defense and veterans pain rating scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool combining a numerical rating scale (NRS) with descriptive words, colors, and facial expressions. This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the DVPRS (K-DVPRS) for postoperative pain assessment.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic abdominal surgery. The original DVPRS was translated into Korean using a forward-backward method. Pain intensities at rest and during coughing were assessed at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively using the NRS and K-DVPRS, respectively. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was also used. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the K-DVPRS were evaluated.

Results: Of the 174 patients screened, 150 were enrolled, and 148 completed the study. The K-DVPRS had strong convergent validity with the NRS at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (ρ: 0.75 to 0.78, all P < 0.001). Construct validity was confirmed by significant differences in pain scores based on surgical extent and duration. The internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha: 0.77 and 0.85 at 24 and 48 hours, respectively), and test-retest reliability at 24 hours was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.90 at rest and 0.95 during coughing). Responsiveness, measured by Cliff's effect size, was high from preoperative to 24 hours postoperatively and moderate from 24 to 48 hours. At 48 hours, the K-DVPRS had stronger correlations with the EQ-5D-5L index and EQVAS than with the NRS.

Conclusions: The K-DVPRS is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for assessing postoperative pain in Korean patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信