JCPP advances Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12272
Verity Rose Jones, Justin Waring, Nicola Wright, Sarah-Jane Fenton
{"title":"A rapid realist review of literature examining Co-production in mental health services for youth.","authors":"Verity Rose Jones, Justin Waring, Nicola Wright, Sarah-Jane Fenton","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An overview of internationally published literature on what works for co-production in youth mental health services is missing, despite a practice and policy context strongly recommending this approach. This rapid realist review develops a theory about how and why co-production methods in youth mental health services work, for whom and in which circumstances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant evidence was synthesised to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOs) that can inform policy and practice. Stakeholders were iteratively involved by engaging an expert panel including young people and a separate youth advisory group. Searches across eight databases and expert panel suggestions identified 5716 documents which were screened at abstract level, 532 at full-text and 57 documents were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data extracted from 57 papers contributed to five CMO configurations to describe the generative mechanisms by which co-production in youth mental health services are linked to outcomes and influenced by context. The final programme theory is: Youth experts by experience (YEBE), particularly those from minoritised communities, provided with a supportive organisational culture can experience authentic engagement where their knowledge is perceived as credible by wider stakeholders. This leads to personal development for participating YEBE as well as service improvements from their input.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rich data from a heterogenous sample of papers along with stakeholder consultation enabled this review to refine a clear programme theory for co-production in mental health services for young people. Nevertheless, further information is needed to identify what constitutes a supportive organisational culture and to explore rival theories or under-evidenced areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":"4 4","pages":"e12272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管实践和政策环境都强烈建议在青少年心理健康服务中采用共同生产的方法,但国际上却没有关于共同生产方法在青少年心理健康服务中的作用的文献综述。这篇快速现实主义评论就青少年心理健康服务中的共同制作方法如何以及为何有效、对谁有效以及在何种情况下有效等问题提出了一套理论:方法:对相关证据进行了综合,以制定 "情境-机制-结果 "配置(CMOs),为政策和实践提供依据。利益相关者通过让包括年轻人在内的专家小组和一个单独的青年咨询小组反复参与其中。通过对八个数据库的搜索和专家小组的建议,确定了 5716 篇文献,对这些文献进行了摘要筛选,532 篇进行了全文筛选,57 篇文献被纳入综述:结果:从 57 篇论文中提取的数据形成了五个 CMO 配置,用以描述青少年心理健康服务中的共同生产与结果之间的联系以及受环境影响的生成机制。最终的方案理论是有经验的青年专家(YEBE),尤其是那些来自少数群体的青年专家,如果有一个支持性的组织文化,就能体验到真正的参与,他们的知识被更广泛的利益相关者视为可信的。这将促进参与的 YEBE 的个人发展,并通过他们的投入改善服务:来自不同论文样本的丰富数据以及对利益相关者的咨询,使本综述能够为青少年心理健康服务中的共同生产完善一个清晰的方案理论。尽管如此,我们还需要更多的信息来确定什么是支持性的组织文化,并探索对立的理论或证据不足的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A rapid realist review of literature examining Co-production in mental health services for youth.

Background: An overview of internationally published literature on what works for co-production in youth mental health services is missing, despite a practice and policy context strongly recommending this approach. This rapid realist review develops a theory about how and why co-production methods in youth mental health services work, for whom and in which circumstances.

Methods: Relevant evidence was synthesised to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOs) that can inform policy and practice. Stakeholders were iteratively involved by engaging an expert panel including young people and a separate youth advisory group. Searches across eight databases and expert panel suggestions identified 5716 documents which were screened at abstract level, 532 at full-text and 57 documents were included in the review.

Results: Data extracted from 57 papers contributed to five CMO configurations to describe the generative mechanisms by which co-production in youth mental health services are linked to outcomes and influenced by context. The final programme theory is: Youth experts by experience (YEBE), particularly those from minoritised communities, provided with a supportive organisational culture can experience authentic engagement where their knowledge is perceived as credible by wider stakeholders. This leads to personal development for participating YEBE as well as service improvements from their input.

Conclusions: Rich data from a heterogenous sample of papers along with stakeholder consultation enabled this review to refine a clear programme theory for co-production in mental health services for young people. Nevertheless, further information is needed to identify what constitutes a supportive organisational culture and to explore rival theories or under-evidenced areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信