术中恒温护理及失效模式及效果分析提高了胃切除术的护理质量。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Xian-Yong Wang, Yi-Lei Zhao, Sha-Sha Wen, Xiao-Yu Song, Lu Mo, Zhi-Wei Xiao
{"title":"术中恒温护理及失效模式及效果分析提高了胃切除术的护理质量。","authors":"Xian-Yong Wang, Yi-Lei Zhao, Sha-Sha Wen, Xiao-Yu Song, Lu Mo, Zhi-Wei Xiao","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in operating room nursing provides valuable insights for the care of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of FMEA on the risk of adverse events and nursing-care quality in patients undergoing radical surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 230 patients receiving radical cancer surgery between May 2019 and May 2024, 115 were assigned to a control group that received standard intraoperative thermoregulation, while the observation group benefited from FMEA-modeled operating room care. Clinical indicators, stress responses, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, nursing quality, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in bed and hospital stay durations between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative body temperature (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Stress scores improved in both groups post-nursing (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with the observation group showing lower stress scores than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery and nursing quality scores also differed significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events such as stress injuries and surgical infections varied notably between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating FMEA into operating room nursing significantly enhances patient care by improving safety, expediting recovery, and reducing healthcare-associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 12","pages":"3764-3771"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative thermostatic nursing and failure mode and effects analysis enhance gastrectomies' care quality.\",\"authors\":\"Xian-Yong Wang, Yi-Lei Zhao, Sha-Sha Wen, Xiao-Yu Song, Lu Mo, Zhi-Wei Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in operating room nursing provides valuable insights for the care of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of FMEA on the risk of adverse events and nursing-care quality in patients undergoing radical surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 230 patients receiving radical cancer surgery between May 2019 and May 2024, 115 were assigned to a control group that received standard intraoperative thermoregulation, while the observation group benefited from FMEA-modeled operating room care. Clinical indicators, stress responses, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, nursing quality, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in bed and hospital stay durations between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative body temperature (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Stress scores improved in both groups post-nursing (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with the observation group showing lower stress scores than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery and nursing quality scores also differed significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events such as stress injuries and surgical infections varied notably between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating FMEA into operating room nursing significantly enhances patient care by improving safety, expediting recovery, and reducing healthcare-associated risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"3764-3771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:失效模式与效果分析(failure mode and effects analysis, FMEA)在手术室护理中的应用,为胃癌根治性手术患者的护理提供了有价值的见解。目的:评价FMEA对根治性手术患者不良事件发生风险及护理质量的影响。方法:在2019年5月至2024年5月期间接受根治性癌症手术的230例患者中,115例被分配到对照组,接受标准术中体温调节,而观察组则受益于fmea模型的手术室护理。比较两组临床指标、应激反应、术后胃肠功能恢复、护理质量、不良事件发生率。结果:两组患者住院时间、床位数比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后体温差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者护理后应激评分均有改善(P < 0.05),观察组患者应激评分低于对照组(P < 0.05)。胃肠功能恢复及护理质量评分差异也有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。应激性损伤、手术感染等不良事件发生率组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:将FMEA纳入手术室护理,通过提高安全性,加快康复,降低医疗相关风险,显著提高患者护理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative thermostatic nursing and failure mode and effects analysis enhance gastrectomies' care quality.

Background: Utilizing failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in operating room nursing provides valuable insights for the care of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of FMEA on the risk of adverse events and nursing-care quality in patients undergoing radical surgery.

Methods: Among 230 patients receiving radical cancer surgery between May 2019 and May 2024, 115 were assigned to a control group that received standard intraoperative thermoregulation, while the observation group benefited from FMEA-modeled operating room care. Clinical indicators, stress responses, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, nursing quality, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results: Significant differences were observed in bed and hospital stay durations between the groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative body temperature (P > 0.05). Stress scores improved in both groups post-nursing (P < 0.05), with the observation group showing lower stress scores than the control group (P < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery and nursing quality scores also differed significantly (P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events such as stress injuries and surgical infections varied notably between the groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Incorporating FMEA into operating room nursing significantly enhances patient care by improving safety, expediting recovery, and reducing healthcare-associated risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信