{"title":"术中恒温护理及失效模式及效果分析提高了胃切除术的护理质量。","authors":"Xian-Yong Wang, Yi-Lei Zhao, Sha-Sha Wen, Xiao-Yu Song, Lu Mo, Zhi-Wei Xiao","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in operating room nursing provides valuable insights for the care of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of FMEA on the risk of adverse events and nursing-care quality in patients undergoing radical surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 230 patients receiving radical cancer surgery between May 2019 and May 2024, 115 were assigned to a control group that received standard intraoperative thermoregulation, while the observation group benefited from FMEA-modeled operating room care. Clinical indicators, stress responses, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, nursing quality, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in bed and hospital stay durations between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative body temperature (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Stress scores improved in both groups post-nursing (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with the observation group showing lower stress scores than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery and nursing quality scores also differed significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events such as stress injuries and surgical infections varied notably between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating FMEA into operating room nursing significantly enhances patient care by improving safety, expediting recovery, and reducing healthcare-associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"16 12","pages":"3764-3771"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative thermostatic nursing and failure mode and effects analysis enhance gastrectomies' care quality.\",\"authors\":\"Xian-Yong Wang, Yi-Lei Zhao, Sha-Sha Wen, Xiao-Yu Song, Lu Mo, Zhi-Wei Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in operating room nursing provides valuable insights for the care of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery<b>.</b></p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of FMEA on the risk of adverse events and nursing-care quality in patients undergoing radical surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 230 patients receiving radical cancer surgery between May 2019 and May 2024, 115 were assigned to a control group that received standard intraoperative thermoregulation, while the observation group benefited from FMEA-modeled operating room care. Clinical indicators, stress responses, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, nursing quality, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in bed and hospital stay durations between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative body temperature (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Stress scores improved in both groups post-nursing (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with the observation group showing lower stress scores than the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery and nursing quality scores also differed significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events such as stress injuries and surgical infections varied notably between the groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating FMEA into operating room nursing significantly enhances patient care by improving safety, expediting recovery, and reducing healthcare-associated risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"3764-3771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3764","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraoperative thermostatic nursing and failure mode and effects analysis enhance gastrectomies' care quality.
Background: Utilizing failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in operating room nursing provides valuable insights for the care of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery.
Aim: To evaluate the impact of FMEA on the risk of adverse events and nursing-care quality in patients undergoing radical surgery.
Methods: Among 230 patients receiving radical cancer surgery between May 2019 and May 2024, 115 were assigned to a control group that received standard intraoperative thermoregulation, while the observation group benefited from FMEA-modeled operating room care. Clinical indicators, stress responses, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery, nursing quality, and the incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.
Results: Significant differences were observed in bed and hospital stay durations between the groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative body temperature (P > 0.05). Stress scores improved in both groups post-nursing (P < 0.05), with the observation group showing lower stress scores than the control group (P < 0.05). Gastrointestinal function recovery and nursing quality scores also differed significantly (P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events such as stress injuries and surgical infections varied notably between the groups (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Incorporating FMEA into operating room nursing significantly enhances patient care by improving safety, expediting recovery, and reducing healthcare-associated risks.