Ali Fatehi Hassanabad MD, MSc , Mortaza Fatehi Hassanabad MSc , Muhammad Israr-Ul-Haq BN , Andrew Maitland MD , William D.T. Kent MD, MSc
{"title":"右前路小开胸主动脉瓣置换术的中期结果。","authors":"Ali Fatehi Hassanabad MD, MSc , Mortaza Fatehi Hassanabad MSc , Muhammad Israr-Ul-Haq BN , Andrew Maitland MD , William D.T. Kent MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Contemporary surgical approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR) include full median sternotomy, hemi-sternotomy, and a right anterior mini thoracotomy (RAMT) approach. We report the midterm outcomes of RAMT for isolated AVR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted, reporting the midterm outcomes of patients who underwent isolated RAMT AVR. The primary outcomes were death and disabling stroke within 30-days of surgery. The secondary outcomes were survival at latest follow-up assessment, hospital readmission for aortic valve disease, prosthetic valve function, and incidence of structural valve deterioration requiring reintervention on the aortic valve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy patients underwent isolated RAMT AVR between February 2016 and February 2018. One patient died from a cardiac cause within 30 days of surgery, whereas none experienced disabling postoperative strokes. The mean follow-up period for the cohort was 74.46 ± 7.54 months. At 95 months, a total of 49 patients were alive. During the follow-up period, 2 patients underwent median sternotomy, 1 for mitral valve replacement and tricuspid repair, and 1 for coronary artery bypass grafting. At last follow-up assessment, the average mean transvalvular gradient was 12.11 ± 9.15 mm Hg. One patient developed prosthetic valve infective endocarditis, and 1 patient was found to have prosthetic valve thrombosis. Prosthetic valve function was normal in 66 patients. At 95 months, freedom from aortic valve reintervention was 98.6%, as 1 patient required redo aortic root surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RAMT AVR can be done safely in the appropriate patient population. Midterm outcomes at our centre are promising, and they suggest that this approach is a good option for managing aortic stenosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages 1484-1490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midterm Outcomes of Right Anterior Mini Thoracotomy Aortic Valve Replacement\",\"authors\":\"Ali Fatehi Hassanabad MD, MSc , Mortaza Fatehi Hassanabad MSc , Muhammad Israr-Ul-Haq BN , Andrew Maitland MD , William D.T. Kent MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Contemporary surgical approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR) include full median sternotomy, hemi-sternotomy, and a right anterior mini thoracotomy (RAMT) approach. We report the midterm outcomes of RAMT for isolated AVR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted, reporting the midterm outcomes of patients who underwent isolated RAMT AVR. The primary outcomes were death and disabling stroke within 30-days of surgery. The secondary outcomes were survival at latest follow-up assessment, hospital readmission for aortic valve disease, prosthetic valve function, and incidence of structural valve deterioration requiring reintervention on the aortic valve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy patients underwent isolated RAMT AVR between February 2016 and February 2018. One patient died from a cardiac cause within 30 days of surgery, whereas none experienced disabling postoperative strokes. The mean follow-up period for the cohort was 74.46 ± 7.54 months. At 95 months, a total of 49 patients were alive. During the follow-up period, 2 patients underwent median sternotomy, 1 for mitral valve replacement and tricuspid repair, and 1 for coronary artery bypass grafting. At last follow-up assessment, the average mean transvalvular gradient was 12.11 ± 9.15 mm Hg. One patient developed prosthetic valve infective endocarditis, and 1 patient was found to have prosthetic valve thrombosis. Prosthetic valve function was normal in 66 patients. At 95 months, freedom from aortic valve reintervention was 98.6%, as 1 patient required redo aortic root surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RAMT AVR can be done safely in the appropriate patient population. Midterm outcomes at our centre are promising, and they suggest that this approach is a good option for managing aortic stenosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJC Open\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1484-1490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJC Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24003846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X24003846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的现代手术入路包括全胸骨正中切开术、半胸骨切开术和右前小胸切开术(RAMT)入路。我们报告RAMT治疗孤立AVR的中期结果。方法:进行回顾性研究,报告孤立性RAMT AVR患者的中期结果。主要结局是手术后30天内死亡和致残性中风。次要结果是最新随访评估时的生存率、主动脉瓣疾病的再入院率、人工瓣膜功能以及需要再次介入主动脉瓣的结构性瓣膜恶化的发生率。结果:2016年2月至2018年2月期间,70例患者接受了孤立性RAMT AVR。一名患者在手术30天内死于心脏原因,而没有人经历术后中风致残。该队列平均随访时间为74.46±7.54个月。在95个月时,共有49名患者存活。随访期间,2例患者行胸骨正中切开术,1例行二尖瓣置换术及三尖瓣修复术,1例行冠状动脉旁路移植术。最后随访时,经瓣梯度平均值为12.11±9.15 mm Hg, 1例发生人工瓣膜感染性心内膜炎,1例发生人工瓣膜血栓形成。66例人工瓣膜功能正常。在95个月时,主动脉瓣再次介入治疗的成功率为98.6%,其中1例患者需要重新进行主动脉根部手术。结论:RAMT AVR在适当的患者群体中可以安全进行。我们中心的中期结果是有希望的,他们认为这种方法是治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的一个很好的选择。
Midterm Outcomes of Right Anterior Mini Thoracotomy Aortic Valve Replacement
Background
Contemporary surgical approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR) include full median sternotomy, hemi-sternotomy, and a right anterior mini thoracotomy (RAMT) approach. We report the midterm outcomes of RAMT for isolated AVR.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted, reporting the midterm outcomes of patients who underwent isolated RAMT AVR. The primary outcomes were death and disabling stroke within 30-days of surgery. The secondary outcomes were survival at latest follow-up assessment, hospital readmission for aortic valve disease, prosthetic valve function, and incidence of structural valve deterioration requiring reintervention on the aortic valve.
Results
Seventy patients underwent isolated RAMT AVR between February 2016 and February 2018. One patient died from a cardiac cause within 30 days of surgery, whereas none experienced disabling postoperative strokes. The mean follow-up period for the cohort was 74.46 ± 7.54 months. At 95 months, a total of 49 patients were alive. During the follow-up period, 2 patients underwent median sternotomy, 1 for mitral valve replacement and tricuspid repair, and 1 for coronary artery bypass grafting. At last follow-up assessment, the average mean transvalvular gradient was 12.11 ± 9.15 mm Hg. One patient developed prosthetic valve infective endocarditis, and 1 patient was found to have prosthetic valve thrombosis. Prosthetic valve function was normal in 66 patients. At 95 months, freedom from aortic valve reintervention was 98.6%, as 1 patient required redo aortic root surgery.
Conclusions
RAMT AVR can be done safely in the appropriate patient population. Midterm outcomes at our centre are promising, and they suggest that this approach is a good option for managing aortic stenosis.