黏液性乳腺癌对新辅助化疗的反应。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5903
Berkay Kiliç, Burak Ilhan
{"title":"黏液性乳腺癌对新辅助化疗的反应。","authors":"Berkay Kiliç, Burak Ilhan","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) is thought to be a favorable-differentiated form of invasive breast cancer and is rarely preferred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The study aimed to define the response of MBCs to NAC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A review was made of the demographic, clinicopathologic characteristics, management and follow-up data of 70 patients diagnosed with MBC between May 2010 and December 2020 by examining the patients' historical files and oncology records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age, tumor size, and follow-up period of patients were 52.9 (range: 32-87) years, 25.8 (range: 8-88) mm, and 61.5 (range: 18-143) months, respectively. Of the 70 patients, 45 had conservative surgery, 25 had a mastectomy, and 22 had axillary clearance due to a positive sentinel node biopsy or clinical axilla. Eight patients (11.4%) received NAC. Twenty-one patients (30.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas almost all the patients received hormone therapy. The preoperative core biopsy diagnosis of four of eight patients receiving NAC was unspecified invasive breast carcinoma. NAC was used as treatment in patients who were younger, had tumors larger in diameter, had tumors with an initial higher T-stage, and especially those with clinically positive axilla, and tumors with a higher Ki-67 index. Despite these preference criteria, both the overall mastectomy and axillary clearance rates were significantly higher in these patients. Two local and five systemic recurrences were observed in the follow-up period. NAC had no significant contribution to survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It may be concluded that NAC is not sufficiently effective in either helping to diminish the need for mastectomy by downsizing the tumor, or in preventing axillary clearance in MBCs, and no significant benefit on survival could be observed. In addition, the results may emphasize the importance of identifying the MBC subtype, and the significant association between the degree of response to NAC and the subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"54 6","pages":"1223-1229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of mucinous breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Berkay Kiliç, Burak Ilhan\",\"doi\":\"10.55730/1300-0144.5903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) is thought to be a favorable-differentiated form of invasive breast cancer and is rarely preferred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The study aimed to define the response of MBCs to NAC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A review was made of the demographic, clinicopathologic characteristics, management and follow-up data of 70 patients diagnosed with MBC between May 2010 and December 2020 by examining the patients' historical files and oncology records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age, tumor size, and follow-up period of patients were 52.9 (range: 32-87) years, 25.8 (range: 8-88) mm, and 61.5 (range: 18-143) months, respectively. Of the 70 patients, 45 had conservative surgery, 25 had a mastectomy, and 22 had axillary clearance due to a positive sentinel node biopsy or clinical axilla. Eight patients (11.4%) received NAC. Twenty-one patients (30.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas almost all the patients received hormone therapy. The preoperative core biopsy diagnosis of four of eight patients receiving NAC was unspecified invasive breast carcinoma. NAC was used as treatment in patients who were younger, had tumors larger in diameter, had tumors with an initial higher T-stage, and especially those with clinically positive axilla, and tumors with a higher Ki-67 index. Despite these preference criteria, both the overall mastectomy and axillary clearance rates were significantly higher in these patients. Two local and five systemic recurrences were observed in the follow-up period. NAC had no significant contribution to survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It may be concluded that NAC is not sufficiently effective in either helping to diminish the need for mastectomy by downsizing the tumor, or in preventing axillary clearance in MBCs, and no significant benefit on survival could be observed. In addition, the results may emphasize the importance of identifying the MBC subtype, and the significant association between the degree of response to NAC and the subtype.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"1223-1229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5903\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:粘液性乳腺癌(MBC)被认为是一种良好分化的浸润性乳腺癌,很少被新辅助化疗(NAC)所选择。该研究旨在确定MBCs对NAC的反应。材料与方法:回顾2010年5月至2020年12月70例诊断为MBC的患者的病史档案和肿瘤记录,分析其人口学、临床病理特征、治疗和随访资料。结果:患者中位年龄为52.9岁(范围:32-87)岁,肿瘤大小为25.8 mm(范围:8-88),随访时间为61.5个月(范围:18-143)。在70例患者中,45例进行了保守手术,25例进行了乳房切除术,22例由于前哨淋巴结活检或临床腋窝阳性而进行了腋窝清除。8例患者(11.4%)接受NAC治疗。21例患者(30.0%)接受了辅助化疗,而几乎所有患者都接受了激素治疗。8例接受NAC的患者中有4例术前核心活检诊断为未明确的浸润性乳腺癌。NAC适用于年龄较小、肿瘤直径较大、肿瘤初始t分期较高,尤其是临床腋窝阳性、Ki-67指数较高的患者。尽管有这些偏好标准,但这些患者的整体乳房切除术和腋窝清除率都明显更高。随访期间2例局部复发,5例全身复发。NAC对生存无显著贡献。结论:NAC在通过缩小肿瘤来减少乳房切除术的需要或防止MBCs的腋窝清除方面都没有足够的效果,并且在生存方面没有明显的益处。此外,该结果可能强调了鉴定MBC亚型的重要性,以及对NAC的反应程度与亚型之间的显着相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response of mucinous breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Background/aim: Mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) is thought to be a favorable-differentiated form of invasive breast cancer and is rarely preferred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The study aimed to define the response of MBCs to NAC.

Materials and methods: A review was made of the demographic, clinicopathologic characteristics, management and follow-up data of 70 patients diagnosed with MBC between May 2010 and December 2020 by examining the patients' historical files and oncology records.

Results: The median age, tumor size, and follow-up period of patients were 52.9 (range: 32-87) years, 25.8 (range: 8-88) mm, and 61.5 (range: 18-143) months, respectively. Of the 70 patients, 45 had conservative surgery, 25 had a mastectomy, and 22 had axillary clearance due to a positive sentinel node biopsy or clinical axilla. Eight patients (11.4%) received NAC. Twenty-one patients (30.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas almost all the patients received hormone therapy. The preoperative core biopsy diagnosis of four of eight patients receiving NAC was unspecified invasive breast carcinoma. NAC was used as treatment in patients who were younger, had tumors larger in diameter, had tumors with an initial higher T-stage, and especially those with clinically positive axilla, and tumors with a higher Ki-67 index. Despite these preference criteria, both the overall mastectomy and axillary clearance rates were significantly higher in these patients. Two local and five systemic recurrences were observed in the follow-up period. NAC had no significant contribution to survival.

Conclusion: It may be concluded that NAC is not sufficiently effective in either helping to diminish the need for mastectomy by downsizing the tumor, or in preventing axillary clearance in MBCs, and no significant benefit on survival could be observed. In addition, the results may emphasize the importance of identifying the MBC subtype, and the significant association between the degree of response to NAC and the subtype.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信