用德尔菲法确定本科放射肿瘤学微职员。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Julia Willcox, Austin T Gregg, Steve Braunstein, Malcolm D Mattes, Jillian Gunther, Matthew Abrams
{"title":"用德尔菲法确定本科放射肿瘤学微职员。","authors":"Julia Willcox, Austin T Gregg, Steve Braunstein, Malcolm D Mattes, Jillian Gunther, Matthew Abrams","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many medical students in the US lack formal exposure to radiation oncology (RO). In contrast to multi-week electives, microclerkships, defined here as brief (<1 week) observerships, could provide exposure to RO. The primary objective of this study was to establish expert consensus for the duration, curriculum, target audience, and goals/objectives of an RO microclerkship. With these components, the microclerkship aims to provide medical students with the necessary exposure to RO.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A needs assessment evaluating the demand for, and essential elements of, an RO microclerkship was distributed to medical student clerkship directors. Based on responses, the authors developed a preliminary set of 7 goals, 5 objectives, and 4 curricular items. These were refined through an iterative Delphi process. Three surveys were sent to 7 medical education experts across several institutions and medical specialties. Surveys asked experts to rank elements for inclusion, comment on clarity, and suggest new ones. The consensus threshold was defined as 83% of respondents selecting \"Definitely Include\" or \"Maybe Include.\" The final survey asked experts to explain the selection of exclusionary options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys demonstrated that third-year medical students and 3 to 5 days were the ideal target audience and duration for an RO microclerkship. The final goals emphasized the following: the role/value of RO, understanding of RO mechanisms, RO integration in care, interdisciplinary management, longitudinal care, and workflow. Final objectives included seeing a consult, follow-up, and on-treatment visit; participating in a simulation; and observing contouring, treatment planning, and radiation plan review. Curricular items were preclinic/postclinic quizzes, a 1-hour introduction to RO lecture, and a shadowing experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the Delphi process, we have established a framework for an RO microclerkship with a consensus duration, curriculum, target audience, and goals/objectives. Integration of this 3- to 5-day microclerkship into third-year medical school curricula would provide an avenue for increased exposure to RO during undergraduate medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining an Undergraduate Radiation Oncology Microclerkship Using the Delphi Method.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Willcox, Austin T Gregg, Steve Braunstein, Malcolm D Mattes, Jillian Gunther, Matthew Abrams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many medical students in the US lack formal exposure to radiation oncology (RO). In contrast to multi-week electives, microclerkships, defined here as brief (<1 week) observerships, could provide exposure to RO. The primary objective of this study was to establish expert consensus for the duration, curriculum, target audience, and goals/objectives of an RO microclerkship. With these components, the microclerkship aims to provide medical students with the necessary exposure to RO.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A needs assessment evaluating the demand for, and essential elements of, an RO microclerkship was distributed to medical student clerkship directors. Based on responses, the authors developed a preliminary set of 7 goals, 5 objectives, and 4 curricular items. These were refined through an iterative Delphi process. Three surveys were sent to 7 medical education experts across several institutions and medical specialties. Surveys asked experts to rank elements for inclusion, comment on clarity, and suggest new ones. The consensus threshold was defined as 83% of respondents selecting \\\"Definitely Include\\\" or \\\"Maybe Include.\\\" The final survey asked experts to explain the selection of exclusionary options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys demonstrated that third-year medical students and 3 to 5 days were the ideal target audience and duration for an RO microclerkship. The final goals emphasized the following: the role/value of RO, understanding of RO mechanisms, RO integration in care, interdisciplinary management, longitudinal care, and workflow. Final objectives included seeing a consult, follow-up, and on-treatment visit; participating in a simulation; and observing contouring, treatment planning, and radiation plan review. Curricular items were preclinic/postclinic quizzes, a 1-hour introduction to RO lecture, and a shadowing experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the Delphi process, we have established a framework for an RO microclerkship with a consensus duration, curriculum, target audience, and goals/objectives. Integration of this 3- to 5-day microclerkship into third-year medical school curricula would provide an avenue for increased exposure to RO during undergraduate medical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国许多医学生缺乏对放射肿瘤学(RO)的正式接触。与多周选修课不同,微型见习在这里被定义为简短的(材料和方法:对RO微型见习的需求和基本要素进行评估的需求评估)分发给医学生见习主任。根据回应,作者制定了一套初步的7个目标,5个目标和4个课程项目。这些都是通过一个迭代的德尔菲过程提炼出来的。三份调查发给了几个机构和医学专业的七名医学教育专家。调查要求专家对包含的元素进行排名,对清晰度进行评论,并提出新元素的建议。共识阈值定义为83%的受访者选择“肯定包括”或“可能包括”。最后一项调查要求专家解释排除选项的选择。结果:调查显示,三年级医学生和3-5天是RO微见习的理想目标受众和时间。最终目标强调如下:RO的作用/价值、RO机制的理解、RO在护理中的整合、跨学科管理、纵向护理和工作流程。最终目标包括咨询,随访和治疗访问,参与模拟,观察轮廓,治疗计划。以及辐射计划审查。课程项目包括门诊前/门诊后测试、1小时RO介绍讲座和实习经历。结论:通过德尔菲过程,我们建立了一个具有共识期限、课程、目标受众和目标/目的的RO微职员框架。将这种为期3-5天的微型见习工作纳入医学院三年级课程,将为在本科医学教育期间增加接触RO提供途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining an Undergraduate Radiation Oncology Microclerkship Using the Delphi Method.

Purpose: Many medical students in the US lack formal exposure to radiation oncology (RO). In contrast to multi-week electives, microclerkships, defined here as brief (<1 week) observerships, could provide exposure to RO. The primary objective of this study was to establish expert consensus for the duration, curriculum, target audience, and goals/objectives of an RO microclerkship. With these components, the microclerkship aims to provide medical students with the necessary exposure to RO.

Methods and materials: A needs assessment evaluating the demand for, and essential elements of, an RO microclerkship was distributed to medical student clerkship directors. Based on responses, the authors developed a preliminary set of 7 goals, 5 objectives, and 4 curricular items. These were refined through an iterative Delphi process. Three surveys were sent to 7 medical education experts across several institutions and medical specialties. Surveys asked experts to rank elements for inclusion, comment on clarity, and suggest new ones. The consensus threshold was defined as 83% of respondents selecting "Definitely Include" or "Maybe Include." The final survey asked experts to explain the selection of exclusionary options.

Results: Surveys demonstrated that third-year medical students and 3 to 5 days were the ideal target audience and duration for an RO microclerkship. The final goals emphasized the following: the role/value of RO, understanding of RO mechanisms, RO integration in care, interdisciplinary management, longitudinal care, and workflow. Final objectives included seeing a consult, follow-up, and on-treatment visit; participating in a simulation; and observing contouring, treatment planning, and radiation plan review. Curricular items were preclinic/postclinic quizzes, a 1-hour introduction to RO lecture, and a shadowing experience.

Conclusions: Through the Delphi process, we have established a framework for an RO microclerkship with a consensus duration, curriculum, target audience, and goals/objectives. Integration of this 3- to 5-day microclerkship into third-year medical school curricula would provide an avenue for increased exposure to RO during undergraduate medical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信