高危患者LDL-C <70 mg/dL后使用中等强度他汀类药物进行脂质治疗。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Geunhee Park, Eui-Young Choi, Sang-Hak Lee
{"title":"高危患者LDL-C <70 mg/dL后使用中等强度他汀类药物进行脂质治疗。","authors":"Geunhee Park, Eui-Young Choi, Sang-Hak Lee","doi":"10.4070/kcj.2024.0218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Guidelines recommend target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in high-risk patients. However, the value of escalating LLT when the LDL-C targets are achieved with moderate-intensity statins is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of LLT escalation in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective propensity score-matched study, we screened data from two university hospitals between 2006 and 2021. Of the 54,069 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), 3,205 who achieved LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins were included. After 1:3 matching, 1,315 patients (339 with LLT escalation and 976 without) were ultimately examined. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)1 (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke) and all-cause death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, the MACCE1 rate was not significantly lower in the escalation group than in the non-escalation group (9.8 and 14.3/1,000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.09; p=0.11). Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar results (log-rank p=0.11). The risk of all-cause death did not differ between the groups. MACCE2 rate, which additionally includes coronary/peripheral revascularization, was lower in the escalation group (24.5 and 35.4/1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94; p=0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLT escalation did not significantly lower hard cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death in patients with ASCVD achieving LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins. However, it had benefit in reducing revascularization rates in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17850,"journal":{"name":"Korean Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escalating Lipid Therapy After Achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL With Moderate-Intensity Statins in High-Risk Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Geunhee Park, Eui-Young Choi, Sang-Hak Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4070/kcj.2024.0218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Guidelines recommend target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in high-risk patients. However, the value of escalating LLT when the LDL-C targets are achieved with moderate-intensity statins is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of LLT escalation in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective propensity score-matched study, we screened data from two university hospitals between 2006 and 2021. Of the 54,069 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), 3,205 who achieved LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins were included. After 1:3 matching, 1,315 patients (339 with LLT escalation and 976 without) were ultimately examined. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)1 (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke) and all-cause death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, the MACCE1 rate was not significantly lower in the escalation group than in the non-escalation group (9.8 and 14.3/1,000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.09; p=0.11). Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar results (log-rank p=0.11). The risk of all-cause death did not differ between the groups. MACCE2 rate, which additionally includes coronary/peripheral revascularization, was lower in the escalation group (24.5 and 35.4/1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94; p=0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLT escalation did not significantly lower hard cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death in patients with ASCVD achieving LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins. However, it had benefit in reducing revascularization rates in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0218\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:指南推荐高危患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标水平和强化降脂治疗(LLT)。然而,当使用中等强度他汀类药物达到LDL-C目标时,LLT升高的价值尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估在这一人群中LLT升级的益处。方法:在这项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究中,我们筛选了2006年至2021年间两所大学医院的数据。在54069例动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)患者中,3205例达到LDL-C水平。结果:在5.7年的中位随访期间,MACCE1升高组的发生率并未显著低于非升高组(分别为9.8和14.3/ 1000人年;风险比[HR], 0.68;95%置信区间[CI], 0.43-1.09;p = 0.11)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示了类似的结果(log-rank p=0.11)。两组之间全因死亡的风险没有差异。包括冠状动脉/外周血运重建术在内的MACCE2率在升级组中较低(分别为24.5和35.4 000人年);人力资源,0.70;95% ci, 0.52-0.94;p = 0.017)。结论:在达到LDL-C水平的ASCVD患者中,LLT升级并没有显著降低硬心血管结局和全因死亡
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Escalating Lipid Therapy After Achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL With Moderate-Intensity Statins in High-Risk Patients.

Background and objectives: Guidelines recommend target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in high-risk patients. However, the value of escalating LLT when the LDL-C targets are achieved with moderate-intensity statins is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of LLT escalation in this population.

Methods: In this retrospective propensity score-matched study, we screened data from two university hospitals between 2006 and 2021. Of the 54,069 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), 3,205 who achieved LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins were included. After 1:3 matching, 1,315 patients (339 with LLT escalation and 976 without) were ultimately examined. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)1 (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke) and all-cause death.

Results: During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, the MACCE1 rate was not significantly lower in the escalation group than in the non-escalation group (9.8 and 14.3/1,000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.09; p=0.11). Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar results (log-rank p=0.11). The risk of all-cause death did not differ between the groups. MACCE2 rate, which additionally includes coronary/peripheral revascularization, was lower in the escalation group (24.5 and 35.4/1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94; p=0.017).

Conclusions: LLT escalation did not significantly lower hard cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause death in patients with ASCVD achieving LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with moderate-intensity statins. However, it had benefit in reducing revascularization rates in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Circulation Journal
Korean Circulation Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
17.20%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Korean Circulation Journal is the official journal of the Korean Society of Cardiology, the Korean Pediatric Heart Society, the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, and the Korean Society of Heart Failure. Abbreviated title is ''Korean Circ J''. Korean Circulation Journal, established in 1971, is a professional, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including original articles of basic research and clinical findings, review articles, editorials, images in cardiovascular medicine, and letters to the editor. Korean Circulation Journal is published monthly in English and publishes scientific and state-of-the-art clinical articles aimed at improving human health in general and contributing to the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in particular. The journal is published on the official website (https://e-kcj.org). It is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE, Web of Science), Scopus, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, KoreaMed, KoreaMed Synapse and KoMCI, and easily available to wide international researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信