局部应用阿米替林和去甲替林对牙髓麻醉失败牙槽下神经阻滞成功后不可逆牙髓炎疼痛的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Q2 Dentistry
Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/drj.drj_324_23
Armita Vali Sichani, Hossein Baharian, Navid Yaraghi, Zahra Khosravani, Asana Vali Sichani
{"title":"局部应用阿米替林和去甲替林对牙髓麻醉失败牙槽下神经阻滞成功后不可逆牙髓炎疼痛的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Armita Vali Sichani, Hossein Baharian, Navid Yaraghi, Zahra Khosravani, Asana Vali Sichani","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_324_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No consensus has been reached on the effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block. This study aimed to assess the effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful IAN block.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 45 patients with irreversible pulpitis. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups (<i>n</i> = 15) for topical application of 10 mg amitriptyline, 10 mg nortriptyline, and starch (placebo). An IAN block was primarily administered by injection of lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Next, the abovementioned medications were topically applied in each group. The pain level of patients was quantified by the McGill Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS) before the intervention, immediately after injection, and after topical application of materials and compared. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21 using the Chi-square test, likelihood ratio, one-way ANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three interventions significantly decreased pain (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Although nortriptyline caused a greater pain relief, the difference among the three groups was not significant regarding the VAS or Wong-Baker FPRS scores (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although nortriptyline caused a greater reduction in irreversible pulpitis pain than amitriptyline, the difference between the two medications was not significant. Future studies without a placebo group are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"21 ","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Armita Vali Sichani, Hossein Baharian, Navid Yaraghi, Zahra Khosravani, Asana Vali Sichani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/drj.drj_324_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No consensus has been reached on the effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block. This study aimed to assess the effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful IAN block.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 45 patients with irreversible pulpitis. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups (<i>n</i> = 15) for topical application of 10 mg amitriptyline, 10 mg nortriptyline, and starch (placebo). An IAN block was primarily administered by injection of lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Next, the abovementioned medications were topically applied in each group. The pain level of patients was quantified by the McGill Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS) before the intervention, immediately after injection, and after topical application of materials and compared. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21 using the Chi-square test, likelihood ratio, one-way ANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. <i>P</i> < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three interventions significantly decreased pain (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Although nortriptyline caused a greater pain relief, the difference among the three groups was not significant regarding the VAS or Wong-Baker FPRS scores (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although nortriptyline caused a greater reduction in irreversible pulpitis pain than amitriptyline, the difference between the two medications was not significant. Future studies without a placebo group are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676318/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_324_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_324_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部应用阿米替林和去甲替林治疗牙髓下牙槽神经阻滞成功后牙髓麻醉失败的不可逆性牙髓炎疼痛的效果尚未达成共识。本研究旨在评估局部应用阿米替林和去甲替林对IAN阻滞成功后牙髓麻醉失败的牙齿不可逆牙髓炎疼痛的影响。材料与方法:对45例不可逆性牙髓炎患者进行双盲随机对照临床试验。患者被随机分为三组(n = 15),分别局部应用10mg阿米替林、10mg去甲替林和淀粉(安慰剂)。IAN阻滞主要通过利多卡因与1:8万肾上腺素的注射进行。然后在各组局部应用上述药物。采用McGill视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表(FPRS)量化患者在干预前、注射后即刻和局部应用材料后的疼痛水平并进行比较。采用SPSS version 21对数据进行分析,采用卡方检验、似然比、单因素方差分析、重复测量方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:三种干预措施均能显著减轻疼痛(P < 0.05)。虽然去甲替林对疼痛的缓解作用更大,但在VAS评分和Wong-Baker FPRS评分方面,三组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:去甲替林对不可逆性牙髓炎疼痛的减轻作用虽大于阿米替林,但两种药物间差异不显著。建议未来的研究不使用安慰剂组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized clinical trial.

Background: No consensus has been reached on the effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block. This study aimed to assess the effect of topical application of amitriptyline and nortriptyline on irreversible pulpitis pain in teeth with failed pulpal anesthesia after a successful IAN block.

Materials and methods: This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 45 patients with irreversible pulpitis. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 15) for topical application of 10 mg amitriptyline, 10 mg nortriptyline, and starch (placebo). An IAN block was primarily administered by injection of lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Next, the abovementioned medications were topically applied in each group. The pain level of patients was quantified by the McGill Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS) before the intervention, immediately after injection, and after topical application of materials and compared. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 21 using the Chi-square test, likelihood ratio, one-way ANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: All three interventions significantly decreased pain (P < 0.05). Although nortriptyline caused a greater pain relief, the difference among the three groups was not significant regarding the VAS or Wong-Baker FPRS scores (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Although nortriptyline caused a greater reduction in irreversible pulpitis pain than amitriptyline, the difference between the two medications was not significant. Future studies without a placebo group are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信