高脂糖盐产品的流行、标签特征和店内限制区域内销售的食品类别：对英国三家超市在2022年实施食品（促销和放置）法规后的调查

IF 3.8 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS

Current Developments in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104509

Ella Hurst, Sally G Moore, Lewis W Wallis

{"title":"高脂糖盐产品的流行、标签特征和店内限制区域内销售的食品类别：对英国三家超市在2022年实施食品（促销和放置）法规后的调查","authors":"Ella Hurst, Sally G Moore, Lewis W Wallis","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Regulations restricting the promotion of some less-healthy products high in fat, sugar, or salt (HFSS) within “restricted areas” (RAs) of supermarkets came into force in October 2022 in England.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the prevalence of HFSS products and front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPNL) characteristics of foods sold within RAs in a sample of supermarket stores.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey of products in RAs in 3 supermarkets was undertaken from November 2022 to February 2023 using photographs, recording the display of FOPNL. Identified via the online supermarket, product nutrition and ingredient data were collected and used to categorize each as either “in” or out-of-scope of the regulations. The UK Nutrient Profiling Model was used to determine product HFSS status and the FOPNL multiple traffic light criteria used to calculate the number of inherent red traffic lights (iRTLs) possessed. Prevalence of HFSS, FOPNL, and iRTLs were calculated as a proportion (%) of total products. Associations between these characteristics were explored using chi-squared tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 86 RAs were identified across the 3 stores, of which 32 displayed 679 food products. Most of these products fell into categories considered out-of-scope of the regulations (64%, <em>n =</em> 435) with prevalence of HFSS at 42% (282 of 435 products). For products within in-scope categories, 17% were HFSS (42 of 245). Half of all included products (53%, <em>n =</em> 357) displayed FOPNL, and 16% possessed 1–3 iRTLs, including both HFSS and non-HFSS items. HFSS products in categories in-scope of the regulations were less likely to display FOPNL compared with non-HFSS products (X<sup>2</sup> =25, <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>After the implementation of The Food (Promotion and Placement) Regulations, foods sold in RAs of 3 supermarkets included those in categories in- and out-of-scope, a variable prevalence of less-healthy (HFSS) products, display of FOPNL, and possession of iRTLs. Findings and approach support future impact evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 104509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of High Fat Sugar Salt Products, Labeling Characteristics, and Categories of Foods Sold within In-Store Restricted Areas: A Survey in 3 UK Supermarkets after the 2022 Implementation of the Food (Promotion and Placement) Regulations\",\"authors\":\"Ella Hurst, Sally G Moore, Lewis W Wallis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Regulations restricting the promotion of some less-healthy products high in fat, sugar, or salt (HFSS) within “restricted areas” (RAs) of supermarkets came into force in October 2022 in England.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the prevalence of HFSS products and front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPNL) characteristics of foods sold within RAs in a sample of supermarket stores.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey of products in RAs in 3 supermarkets was undertaken from November 2022 to February 2023 using photographs, recording the display of FOPNL. Identified via the online supermarket, product nutrition and ingredient data were collected and used to categorize each as either “in” or out-of-scope of the regulations. The UK Nutrient Profiling Model was used to determine product HFSS status and the FOPNL multiple traffic light criteria used to calculate the number of inherent red traffic lights (iRTLs) possessed. Prevalence of HFSS, FOPNL, and iRTLs were calculated as a proportion (%) of total products. Associations between these characteristics were explored using chi-squared tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 86 RAs were identified across the 3 stores, of which 32 displayed 679 food products. Most of these products fell into categories considered out-of-scope of the regulations (64%, <em>n =</em> 435) with prevalence of HFSS at 42% (282 of 435 products). For products within in-scope categories, 17% were HFSS (42 of 245). Half of all included products (53%, <em>n =</em> 357) displayed FOPNL, and 16% possessed 1–3 iRTLs, including both HFSS and non-HFSS items. HFSS products in categories in-scope of the regulations were less likely to display FOPNL compared with non-HFSS products (X<sup>2</sup> =25, <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>After the implementation of The Food (Promotion and Placement) Regulations, foods sold in RAs of 3 supermarkets included those in categories in- and out-of-scope, a variable prevalence of less-healthy (HFSS) products, display of FOPNL, and possession of iRTLs. Findings and approach support future impact evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 104509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681850/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Developments in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：限制在超市“禁区”（RAs）内推广一些高脂肪、高糖或高盐（HFSS）不健康产品的规定于2022年10月在英国生效。目的：评价高脂食品的流行程度和食品包装前营养标签（FOPNL）特征在超市商店的RAs内销售的样本。方法：于2022年11月至2023年2月对3家超市的RAs产品进行横断面调查，采用照片记录FOPNL的展示情况。通过网上超市识别，收集产品营养和成分数据，并用于将每种产品分类为“在”或“不在”规定范围内。英国营养分析模型用于确定产品HFSS状态，FOPNL多重交通信号灯标准用于计算固有红色交通信号灯（irtl）的数量。计算HFSS、FOPNL和irtl的患病率占总产品的比例（%）。使用卡方检验探讨这些特征之间的关联。结果：3家门店共识别出86家ra，其中32家门店展示679种食品。这些产品中的大多数属于被认为不在法规范围内的类别（64%,n = 435）， HFSS患病率为42%（435种产品中的282种）。对于范围内类别的产品，17%是HFSS（245个中的42个）。所有纳入的产品中有一半（53%,n = 357）显示FOPNL， 16%具有1-3个irtl，包括HFSS和非HFSS产品。与非HFSS产品相比，在法规范围内的HFSS产品不太可能显示FOPNL （X2 =25, P < 0.001）。结论：《食品（促销和放置）条例》实施后，3家超市RAs销售的食品包括范围内和范围外的食品、低健康食品（HFSS）的不同流行程度、FOPNL的展示和irtl的持有。研究结果和方法支持未来的影响评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Prevalence of High Fat Sugar Salt Products, Labeling Characteristics, and Categories of Foods Sold within In-Store Restricted Areas: A Survey in 3 UK Supermarkets after the 2022 Implementation of the Food (Promotion and Placement) Regulations

Background

Regulations restricting the promotion of some less-healthy products high in fat, sugar, or salt (HFSS) within “restricted areas” (RAs) of supermarkets came into force in October 2022 in England.

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence of HFSS products and front-of-pack nutrition labeling (FOPNL) characteristics of foods sold within RAs in a sample of supermarket stores.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of products in RAs in 3 supermarkets was undertaken from November 2022 to February 2023 using photographs, recording the display of FOPNL. Identified via the online supermarket, product nutrition and ingredient data were collected and used to categorize each as either “in” or out-of-scope of the regulations. The UK Nutrient Profiling Model was used to determine product HFSS status and the FOPNL multiple traffic light criteria used to calculate the number of inherent red traffic lights (iRTLs) possessed. Prevalence of HFSS, FOPNL, and iRTLs were calculated as a proportion (%) of total products. Associations between these characteristics were explored using chi-squared tests.

Results

A total of 86 RAs were identified across the 3 stores, of which 32 displayed 679 food products. Most of these products fell into categories considered out-of-scope of the regulations (64%, n = 435) with prevalence of HFSS at 42% (282 of 435 products). For products within in-scope categories, 17% were HFSS (42 of 245). Half of all included products (53%, n = 357) displayed FOPNL, and 16% possessed 1–3 iRTLs, including both HFSS and non-HFSS items. HFSS products in categories in-scope of the regulations were less likely to display FOPNL compared with non-HFSS products (X² =25, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

After the implementation of The Food (Promotion and Placement) Regulations, foods sold in RAs of 3 supermarkets included those in categories in- and out-of-scope, a variable prevalence of less-healthy (HFSS) products, display of FOPNL, and possession of iRTLs. Findings and approach support future impact evaluation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊