PET/CT在腹下深层穿支皮瓣收获中的鉴别价值。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Elizabeth Shay, Akash N. Naik, Michael G. Moore, Jessica A. Yesensky, Avinash V. Mantravadi, Michael W. Sim
{"title":"PET/CT在腹下深层穿支皮瓣收获中的鉴别价值。","authors":"Elizabeth Shay,&nbsp;Akash N. Naik,&nbsp;Michael G. Moore,&nbsp;Jessica A. Yesensky,&nbsp;Avinash V. Mantravadi,&nbsp;Michael W. Sim","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>CT angiography (CTA) is used for preoperative localization in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, but is an additional costly study that involves contrast and radiation exposure. Many patients with head and neck cancer already undergo PET/CT. We investigated if PET/CT could be used to preoperatively localize perforators and if this corresponded with the intraoperative location.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective cohort study at an academic tertiary care center between 2017 and 2022. Participants were adults with head and neck cancer who had undergone PET/CT and were scheduled to undergo reconstruction with DIEP flaps. The mean difference between the preoperative and intraoperative horizontal and vertical distance of perforators from the umbilicus was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preoperative and intraoperative measurements were obtained from 42 perforators (30 patients). The mean difference between preoperative and intraoperative measurements was not statistically significant for HDU (−0.05 with 95 % CI [−0.11, 0.01], <em>p</em> = 0.13) or VDU (−0.02 with 95 % CI [−0.06, 0.03] <em>p</em> = 0.41). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated limits of agreement of −0.42 (95 % CI [−0.52, −0.31]) to 0.33 (95 % CI [0.23, 0.43]) for HDU and −0.31 (95 % CI [−0.39, −0.23]) to 0.27 (95 % CI [0.19, 0.35]) for VDU. This was within our chosen limit of agreement of 1 cm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative identification of DIEP perforators on PET/CT can be used to locate perforators intraoperatively. Utilizing this method facilitates efficient flap harvesting and does not require an additional imaging study since many patients undergo PET/CT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 1","pages":"Article 104593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PET/CT for perforator identification in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Shay,&nbsp;Akash N. Naik,&nbsp;Michael G. Moore,&nbsp;Jessica A. Yesensky,&nbsp;Avinash V. Mantravadi,&nbsp;Michael W. Sim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>CT angiography (CTA) is used for preoperative localization in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, but is an additional costly study that involves contrast and radiation exposure. Many patients with head and neck cancer already undergo PET/CT. We investigated if PET/CT could be used to preoperatively localize perforators and if this corresponded with the intraoperative location.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective cohort study at an academic tertiary care center between 2017 and 2022. Participants were adults with head and neck cancer who had undergone PET/CT and were scheduled to undergo reconstruction with DIEP flaps. The mean difference between the preoperative and intraoperative horizontal and vertical distance of perforators from the umbilicus was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Preoperative and intraoperative measurements were obtained from 42 perforators (30 patients). The mean difference between preoperative and intraoperative measurements was not statistically significant for HDU (−0.05 with 95 % CI [−0.11, 0.01], <em>p</em> = 0.13) or VDU (−0.02 with 95 % CI [−0.06, 0.03] <em>p</em> = 0.41). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated limits of agreement of −0.42 (95 % CI [−0.52, −0.31]) to 0.33 (95 % CI [0.23, 0.43]) for HDU and −0.31 (95 % CI [−0.39, −0.23]) to 0.27 (95 % CI [0.19, 0.35]) for VDU. This was within our chosen limit of agreement of 1 cm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative identification of DIEP perforators on PET/CT can be used to locate perforators intraoperatively. Utilizing this method facilitates efficient flap harvesting and does not require an additional imaging study since many patients undergo PET/CT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 104593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400379X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400379X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:CT血管造影(CTA)用于腹下深层穿支(DIEP)皮瓣的术前定位,但这是一项额外的昂贵研究,涉及造影剂和辐射暴露。许多头颈癌患者已经接受了PET/CT检查。我们研究了PET/CT是否可以用于术前定位穿支,以及这是否与术中定位相符。方法:这是一项2017年至2022年在一家学术三级医疗中心进行的前瞻性队列研究。参与者是接受过PET/CT检查的成年头颈癌患者,并计划接受DIEP皮瓣重建。测定术前和术中穿支距脐的水平和垂直距离的平均差值。结果:获得42根穿支(30例)术前及术中测量数据。HDU (-0.05, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.01], p = 0.13)和VDU (-0.02, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.03], p = 0.41)术前和术中测量的平均差异无统计学意义。Bland-Altman分析显示,HDU的一致性限为-0.42 (95% CI[-0.52, -0.31])至0.33 (95% CI [0.23, 0.43]), VDU的一致性限为-0.31 (95% CI[-0.39, -0.23])至0.27 (95% CI[0.19, 0.35])。这是在我们选择的1厘米的协议范围内。结论:术前在PET/CT上识别DIEP穿支可用于术中定位穿支。利用这种方法可以有效地获取皮瓣,并且不需要额外的成像研究,因为许多患者接受了PET/CT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PET/CT for perforator identification in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvest

Background

CT angiography (CTA) is used for preoperative localization in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, but is an additional costly study that involves contrast and radiation exposure. Many patients with head and neck cancer already undergo PET/CT. We investigated if PET/CT could be used to preoperatively localize perforators and if this corresponded with the intraoperative location.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study at an academic tertiary care center between 2017 and 2022. Participants were adults with head and neck cancer who had undergone PET/CT and were scheduled to undergo reconstruction with DIEP flaps. The mean difference between the preoperative and intraoperative horizontal and vertical distance of perforators from the umbilicus was determined.

Results

Preoperative and intraoperative measurements were obtained from 42 perforators (30 patients). The mean difference between preoperative and intraoperative measurements was not statistically significant for HDU (−0.05 with 95 % CI [−0.11, 0.01], p = 0.13) or VDU (−0.02 with 95 % CI [−0.06, 0.03] p = 0.41). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated limits of agreement of −0.42 (95 % CI [−0.52, −0.31]) to 0.33 (95 % CI [0.23, 0.43]) for HDU and −0.31 (95 % CI [−0.39, −0.23]) to 0.27 (95 % CI [0.19, 0.35]) for VDU. This was within our chosen limit of agreement of 1 cm.

Conclusion

Preoperative identification of DIEP perforators on PET/CT can be used to locate perforators intraoperatively. Utilizing this method facilitates efficient flap harvesting and does not require an additional imaging study since many patients undergo PET/CT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信