Lauren A Merrell, Manasa L Kadiyala, Kester Gibbons, Abhishek Ganta, Sanjit R Konda, Kenneth A Egol
{"title":"颅髓钉治疗孤立性股骨粗隆下骨折:骨折类型和围手术期因素的年龄相关变化不影响临床和影像学结果。","authors":"Lauren A Merrell, Manasa L Kadiyala, Kester Gibbons, Abhishek Ganta, Sanjit R Konda, Kenneth A Egol","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01285-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is scarce data in literature on the demographics, treatment, and outcomes of subtrochanteric femur fracture patients. This study evaluated the effect of age on injury details, perioperative and hospital parameters, and outcomes following subtrochanteric fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-approved review of a consecutive series of subtrochanteric femoral fractures was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were examined to confirm patients were operatively treated for an AO/OTA Type 32A, B or C subtrochanteric femur fracture, as well as for demographics, injury information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into younger (Y) (< 65 years old) and older (O) (≥ 65 years old) cohorts. Comparative analyses were conducted between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 205 patients, 161 (78.5%) comprised the O cohort and 44 (21.5%) the Y cohort. The O cohort represented a sicker (higher CCI and ASA), less ambulatory population. Patients in the Y cohort sustained more high-energy injuries (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The most common fracture pattern was type 32A in both cohorts (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Older patients were treated more frequently with a 1-screw nail design (<i>p</i> = 0.005). The Y cohort had a shorter time to surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and were more likely to be discharged home (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no differences in post-op complications, readmission or mortality rates, nonunion, fixation failure, or radiographic time to healing between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger patients present with different subtrochanteric fracture patterns and discharge profiles than older patients and are treated with different implants. However, despite these differences, younger and older patients have similar radiographic and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 1","pages":"84-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cephalomedullary Nails for Isolated Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: Age-Related Variations in Fracture Pattern and Perioperative Factors Do Not Affect Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren A Merrell, Manasa L Kadiyala, Kester Gibbons, Abhishek Ganta, Sanjit R Konda, Kenneth A Egol\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-024-01285-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is scarce data in literature on the demographics, treatment, and outcomes of subtrochanteric femur fracture patients. This study evaluated the effect of age on injury details, perioperative and hospital parameters, and outcomes following subtrochanteric fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-approved review of a consecutive series of subtrochanteric femoral fractures was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were examined to confirm patients were operatively treated for an AO/OTA Type 32A, B or C subtrochanteric femur fracture, as well as for demographics, injury information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into younger (Y) (< 65 years old) and older (O) (≥ 65 years old) cohorts. Comparative analyses were conducted between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 205 patients, 161 (78.5%) comprised the O cohort and 44 (21.5%) the Y cohort. The O cohort represented a sicker (higher CCI and ASA), less ambulatory population. Patients in the Y cohort sustained more high-energy injuries (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The most common fracture pattern was type 32A in both cohorts (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Older patients were treated more frequently with a 1-screw nail design (<i>p</i> = 0.005). The Y cohort had a shorter time to surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and were more likely to be discharged home (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no differences in post-op complications, readmission or mortality rates, nonunion, fixation failure, or radiographic time to healing between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger patients present with different subtrochanteric fracture patterns and discharge profiles than older patients and are treated with different implants. However, despite these differences, younger and older patients have similar radiographic and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"84-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680529/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01285-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01285-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文献中关于股骨粗隆下骨折患者的人口学、治疗和预后的资料很少。本研究评估了年龄对损伤细节、围手术期和住院参数以及转子下骨折固定后预后的影响。方法:对连续一系列股骨粗隆下骨折进行了irb批准的回顾。检查患者图表和x线片,以确认AO/OTA 32A型、B型或C型股骨粗隆下骨折患者接受了手术治疗,以及人口统计学、损伤信息、围手术期细节、x线片参数、医院质量措施和结果。结果:205例患者中,O组161例(78.5%),Y组44例(21.5%)。O组患者病情较重(CCI和ASA较高),流动人群较少。Y组患者持续更多高能损伤(p p = 0.003)。老年患者更常使用1螺钉设计(p = 0.005)。Y组手术时间较短(p = 0.002),出院回家的可能性更大(p结论:年轻患者的转子下骨折类型和出院情况与老年患者不同,采用不同的植入物治疗。然而,尽管存在这些差异,年轻和老年患者具有相似的放射学和临床结果。证据水平:III。
Cephalomedullary Nails for Isolated Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures: Age-Related Variations in Fracture Pattern and Perioperative Factors Do Not Affect Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.
Introduction: There is scarce data in literature on the demographics, treatment, and outcomes of subtrochanteric femur fracture patients. This study evaluated the effect of age on injury details, perioperative and hospital parameters, and outcomes following subtrochanteric fracture fixation.
Methods: An IRB-approved review of a consecutive series of subtrochanteric femoral fractures was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were examined to confirm patients were operatively treated for an AO/OTA Type 32A, B or C subtrochanteric femur fracture, as well as for demographics, injury information, perioperative details, radiographic parameters, hospital quality measures, and outcomes. Patients were divided into younger (Y) (< 65 years old) and older (O) (≥ 65 years old) cohorts. Comparative analyses were conducted between cohorts.
Results: Of 205 patients, 161 (78.5%) comprised the O cohort and 44 (21.5%) the Y cohort. The O cohort represented a sicker (higher CCI and ASA), less ambulatory population. Patients in the Y cohort sustained more high-energy injuries (p < 0.001). The most common fracture pattern was type 32A in both cohorts (p = 0.003). Older patients were treated more frequently with a 1-screw nail design (p = 0.005). The Y cohort had a shorter time to surgery (p = 0.002) and were more likely to be discharged home (p < 0.001). There were no differences in post-op complications, readmission or mortality rates, nonunion, fixation failure, or radiographic time to healing between cohorts.
Conclusion: Younger patients present with different subtrochanteric fracture patterns and discharge profiles than older patients and are treated with different implants. However, despite these differences, younger and older patients have similar radiographic and clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.