减肥手术后代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎和肝纤维化解决的无创测试性能

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Giulia Angelini, Simona Panunzi, Maurizio Pompili, Laura Riccardi, Matteo Garcovich, Ornella Verrastro, Sara Russo, Tracey Mare, James Luxton, Carel W le Roux, Marco Raffaelli, Geltrude Mingrone, Royce P Vincent
{"title":"减肥手术后代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎和肝纤维化解决的无创测试性能","authors":"Giulia Angelini, Simona Panunzi, Maurizio Pompili, Laura Riccardi, Matteo Garcovich, Ornella Verrastro, Sara Russo, Tracey Mare, James Luxton, Carel W le Roux, Marco Raffaelli, Geltrude Mingrone, Royce P Vincent","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Noninvasive tests (NITs) to monitor metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) progression and response to interventions are needed because of the risks of liver biopsy. A monocytes-based diagnostic test using perilipin-2 (PLIN2) and Ras-related protein-14 (RAB14) predict the severity of MASH and fibrosis. Here we compared the performances of PLIN2 and RAB14 with cytokeratin-18 (CK18) assessed by Ella™ or M65 ELISA in predicting MASH and fibrosis resolution following bariatric surgery in a longitudinal and histologically characterized cohort of individuals with obesity. Methods Participants in the BRAVES randomized controlled trial underwent ultrasound-guided needle liver biopsy at baseline and 1 year after surgery. We evaluated NITs’ performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic and calculated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity based on the Youden threshold. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were used to assess the role of recorded covariates in predicting MASH and fibrosis severity, as well as resolution or improvement. Results After surgery, patients who experienced MASH improvement or resolution showed a significant decrease in PLIN2 expression as compared to those who did not, while patients with fibrosis improvement displayed an increase in RAB14. No differences were found for CK18. The diagnostic accuracy of PLIN2 and RAB14 for the prediction of MASH resolution or fibrosis improvement was superior to CK18 assessed by either Ella or M65 ELISA. Conclusions PLIN2 and RAB14, but not CK18, are markers for monitoring improvements in MASH and fibrosis after interventions such as bariatric surgery. This may reduce or eliminate the need for frequent liver biopsies. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03524365","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Noninvasive Tests for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis and Liver Fibrosis Resolution after Bariatric Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Angelini, Simona Panunzi, Maurizio Pompili, Laura Riccardi, Matteo Garcovich, Ornella Verrastro, Sara Russo, Tracey Mare, James Luxton, Carel W le Roux, Marco Raffaelli, Geltrude Mingrone, Royce P Vincent\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvae208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Noninvasive tests (NITs) to monitor metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) progression and response to interventions are needed because of the risks of liver biopsy. A monocytes-based diagnostic test using perilipin-2 (PLIN2) and Ras-related protein-14 (RAB14) predict the severity of MASH and fibrosis. Here we compared the performances of PLIN2 and RAB14 with cytokeratin-18 (CK18) assessed by Ella™ or M65 ELISA in predicting MASH and fibrosis resolution following bariatric surgery in a longitudinal and histologically characterized cohort of individuals with obesity. Methods Participants in the BRAVES randomized controlled trial underwent ultrasound-guided needle liver biopsy at baseline and 1 year after surgery. We evaluated NITs’ performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic and calculated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity based on the Youden threshold. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were used to assess the role of recorded covariates in predicting MASH and fibrosis severity, as well as resolution or improvement. Results After surgery, patients who experienced MASH improvement or resolution showed a significant decrease in PLIN2 expression as compared to those who did not, while patients with fibrosis improvement displayed an increase in RAB14. No differences were found for CK18. The diagnostic accuracy of PLIN2 and RAB14 for the prediction of MASH resolution or fibrosis improvement was superior to CK18 assessed by either Ella or M65 ELISA. Conclusions PLIN2 and RAB14, but not CK18, are markers for monitoring improvements in MASH and fibrosis after interventions such as bariatric surgery. This may reduce or eliminate the need for frequent liver biopsies. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03524365\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae208\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于肝活检的风险,需要无创检测(nit)来监测代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH)的进展和对干预措施的反应。一项基于单核细胞的诊断试验使用perilipin-2 (PLIN2)和ras相关蛋白-14 (RAB14)预测MASH和纤维化的严重程度。在这里,我们比较了PLIN2和RAB14与细胞角蛋白-18 (CK18)的性能,通过Ella™或M65 ELISA评估,在纵向和组织学特征的肥胖个体队列中预测减肥手术后的MASH和纤维化消退。方法:BRAVES随机对照试验的参与者在基线和术后1年接受超声引导下的肝穿刺活检。我们使用接收器工作特征下的面积和基于约登阈值计算的准确性、灵敏度和特异性来评估NITs的性能。使用单变量和多变量逻辑模型来评估记录的协变量在预测MASH和纤维化严重程度以及缓解或改善方面的作用。结果手术后,与未经历MASH改善或缓解的患者相比,经历MASH改善或缓解的患者PLIN2表达显著降低,而纤维化改善的患者RAB14表达增加。在CK18中没有发现差异。PLIN2和RAB14在预测MASH消退或纤维化改善方面的诊断准确性优于Ella或M65 ELISA评估的CK18。结论PLIN2和RAB14,而不是CK18,是监测干预(如减肥手术)后MASH和纤维化改善的标志物。这可能减少或消除频繁肝活检的需要。ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT03524365
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of Noninvasive Tests for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis and Liver Fibrosis Resolution after Bariatric Surgery
Background Noninvasive tests (NITs) to monitor metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) progression and response to interventions are needed because of the risks of liver biopsy. A monocytes-based diagnostic test using perilipin-2 (PLIN2) and Ras-related protein-14 (RAB14) predict the severity of MASH and fibrosis. Here we compared the performances of PLIN2 and RAB14 with cytokeratin-18 (CK18) assessed by Ella™ or M65 ELISA in predicting MASH and fibrosis resolution following bariatric surgery in a longitudinal and histologically characterized cohort of individuals with obesity. Methods Participants in the BRAVES randomized controlled trial underwent ultrasound-guided needle liver biopsy at baseline and 1 year after surgery. We evaluated NITs’ performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic and calculated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity based on the Youden threshold. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were used to assess the role of recorded covariates in predicting MASH and fibrosis severity, as well as resolution or improvement. Results After surgery, patients who experienced MASH improvement or resolution showed a significant decrease in PLIN2 expression as compared to those who did not, while patients with fibrosis improvement displayed an increase in RAB14. No differences were found for CK18. The diagnostic accuracy of PLIN2 and RAB14 for the prediction of MASH resolution or fibrosis improvement was superior to CK18 assessed by either Ella or M65 ELISA. Conclusions PLIN2 and RAB14, but not CK18, are markers for monitoring improvements in MASH and fibrosis after interventions such as bariatric surgery. This may reduce or eliminate the need for frequent liver biopsies. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03524365
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信