动物考古记录中的觅食者和食物生产者的相互关系:来自中非的教训

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Karen D. Lupo, Nicolette M. Edwards, Dave N. Schmitt
{"title":"动物考古记录中的觅食者和食物生产者的相互关系:来自中非的教训","authors":"Karen D. Lupo,&nbsp;Nicolette M. Edwards,&nbsp;Dave N. Schmitt","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2024.101655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Faunal taxonomic abundances and composition are often used as one line of evidence to measure different dimensions of prehistoric population interaction between food producers and foragers. This paper presents a comparative analysis of ethnoarchaeological faunas created by neighboring foragers and farmers in Central Africa who maintain on-going interactions based partly on the exchange of wild resources for domesticated plant products. Analysis of these assemblages is centered on whether faunal characteristics can be used to: 1) distinguish assemblages produced by neighboring forager and food producer populations; 2) identify interaction between these populations and; 3) reflect information about the nature of these interactions. In this sample, measures of bone abundances, taxonomic richness and the presence of rare species can distinguish food producer from forager-created assemblages. High levels of compositional similarity and exploitation intensity associated with forager and farmer assemblages indicate consistent economic activity focused on dominant marketable animals. Differences in richness, bone abundances and, especially, skeletal part representation of common marketable prey reflect economic interactions marked by socioeconomic disparities. These results provide an important guide to the use of ethnoarchaeological data in identifying prehistoric population interactions in the zooarchaeological record defined by sustained exchange and/or market activity and where socioeconomic disparities persisted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forager and food producer interrelationships in the zooarchaeological record: Lessons from Central Africa\",\"authors\":\"Karen D. Lupo,&nbsp;Nicolette M. Edwards,&nbsp;Dave N. Schmitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaa.2024.101655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Faunal taxonomic abundances and composition are often used as one line of evidence to measure different dimensions of prehistoric population interaction between food producers and foragers. This paper presents a comparative analysis of ethnoarchaeological faunas created by neighboring foragers and farmers in Central Africa who maintain on-going interactions based partly on the exchange of wild resources for domesticated plant products. Analysis of these assemblages is centered on whether faunal characteristics can be used to: 1) distinguish assemblages produced by neighboring forager and food producer populations; 2) identify interaction between these populations and; 3) reflect information about the nature of these interactions. In this sample, measures of bone abundances, taxonomic richness and the presence of rare species can distinguish food producer from forager-created assemblages. High levels of compositional similarity and exploitation intensity associated with forager and farmer assemblages indicate consistent economic activity focused on dominant marketable animals. Differences in richness, bone abundances and, especially, skeletal part representation of common marketable prey reflect economic interactions marked by socioeconomic disparities. These results provide an important guide to the use of ethnoarchaeological data in identifying prehistoric population interactions in the zooarchaeological record defined by sustained exchange and/or market activity and where socioeconomic disparities persisted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416524000862\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416524000862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物分类丰度和组成经常被用作衡量史前食物生产者和觅食者之间不同层面的种群相互作用的一条证据线。本文对中非邻近的采集者和农民创造的民族考古动物群进行了比较分析,他们保持着部分基于野生资源交换驯化植物产品的持续互动。对这些组合的分析主要集中在是否可以利用区系特征来区分邻近的觅食者和食物生产者群体产生的组合;2)确定这些种群之间的相互作用;3)反映这些相互作用性质的信息。在这个样本中,测量骨骼丰度、分类丰富度和稀有物种的存在可以区分食物生产者和觅食者创造的组合。与采集者和农民群体相关的高成分相似性和开发强度表明,持续的经济活动集中在优势的可销售动物上。丰富度,骨骼丰度,特别是骨骼部分代表性的差异反映了以社会经济差异为特征的经济相互作用。这些结果为使用民族考古数据识别动物考古记录中的史前种群相互作用提供了重要指导,这些记录由持续的交换和/或市场活动定义,并且社会经济差异持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forager and food producer interrelationships in the zooarchaeological record: Lessons from Central Africa
Faunal taxonomic abundances and composition are often used as one line of evidence to measure different dimensions of prehistoric population interaction between food producers and foragers. This paper presents a comparative analysis of ethnoarchaeological faunas created by neighboring foragers and farmers in Central Africa who maintain on-going interactions based partly on the exchange of wild resources for domesticated plant products. Analysis of these assemblages is centered on whether faunal characteristics can be used to: 1) distinguish assemblages produced by neighboring forager and food producer populations; 2) identify interaction between these populations and; 3) reflect information about the nature of these interactions. In this sample, measures of bone abundances, taxonomic richness and the presence of rare species can distinguish food producer from forager-created assemblages. High levels of compositional similarity and exploitation intensity associated with forager and farmer assemblages indicate consistent economic activity focused on dominant marketable animals. Differences in richness, bone abundances and, especially, skeletal part representation of common marketable prey reflect economic interactions marked by socioeconomic disparities. These results provide an important guide to the use of ethnoarchaeological data in identifying prehistoric population interactions in the zooarchaeological record defined by sustained exchange and/or market activity and where socioeconomic disparities persisted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信