褪黑素对非生物胁迫下小麦农艺性状影响的Meta分析

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shah Fahad, Ihsan Muhammad, Shaohong Zhang, Mona S. Alwahibi, Mohamed S. Elshikh, Jun Wang
{"title":"褪黑素对非生物胁迫下小麦农艺性状影响的Meta分析","authors":"Shah Fahad,&nbsp;Ihsan Muhammad,&nbsp;Shaohong Zhang,&nbsp;Mona S. Alwahibi,&nbsp;Mohamed S. Elshikh,&nbsp;Jun Wang","doi":"10.1111/jac.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This meta-analysis assesses the effects of melatonin (Mel) on various wheat agronomic traits, revealing significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. This comprehensive analysis highlights the variability across studies (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 98% for overall, leaf area, root and shoot weight), indicating a potential for selective reporting in the analysed studies. Grain yield and root weight showed <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> values of 93.78% and 99.54%, respectively, confirming the complex nature of melatonin's impact, which necessitates the use of random-effects models. Notably, the study uncovers significant heterogeneity in wheat traits (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Mel increased grain yield by 33.50% and positively influenced root and shoot weights compared to control (no melatonin; nMel). However, the effects varied across different Mel concentration, application method and environmental stressors. Grain yield significantly increased with Mel application, particularly in foliar spray by 41.40%, compared to nMel. Mel consistently enhanced the overall response ratio (ln<i>RR</i>) of grain yield, grain weight, root length, shoot length, leaf area, plant height, shoot weight and root weight by 33.50%, 24.01%, 21.28%, 32.99%, 36.33%, 15.94%, 22.14% and 20.86% compared to nMel. Compared to nMel, the most pronounced grain yield was observed in Mel under salt stress conditions. The benefits of Mel were more pronounced in Egypt, where grain yield increased by 52.91%, suggesting that local environmental factors significantly influence its efficacy. Its impact varied across different cultivars, with Jimai_22 increased root length by 70.83% and Sids_14 by 56.39% compared to nMel, emphasising the importance of genetic factors. Mel application under salt and Cd stress conditions increased root weight by 336% and 470%, respectively, while decreased by 87% under waterlogging compared to no stress conditions. This indicates that Mel greatly increased plant resistance to abiotic stresses by modulating stress-responsive pathways and improving agronomic traits.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","volume":"211 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Melatonin Application on Wheat Agronomic Traits Under Abiotic Stress: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shah Fahad,&nbsp;Ihsan Muhammad,&nbsp;Shaohong Zhang,&nbsp;Mona S. Alwahibi,&nbsp;Mohamed S. Elshikh,&nbsp;Jun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jac.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This meta-analysis assesses the effects of melatonin (Mel) on various wheat agronomic traits, revealing significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. This comprehensive analysis highlights the variability across studies (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 98% for overall, leaf area, root and shoot weight), indicating a potential for selective reporting in the analysed studies. Grain yield and root weight showed <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> values of 93.78% and 99.54%, respectively, confirming the complex nature of melatonin's impact, which necessitates the use of random-effects models. Notably, the study uncovers significant heterogeneity in wheat traits (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Mel increased grain yield by 33.50% and positively influenced root and shoot weights compared to control (no melatonin; nMel). However, the effects varied across different Mel concentration, application method and environmental stressors. Grain yield significantly increased with Mel application, particularly in foliar spray by 41.40%, compared to nMel. Mel consistently enhanced the overall response ratio (ln<i>RR</i>) of grain yield, grain weight, root length, shoot length, leaf area, plant height, shoot weight and root weight by 33.50%, 24.01%, 21.28%, 32.99%, 36.33%, 15.94%, 22.14% and 20.86% compared to nMel. Compared to nMel, the most pronounced grain yield was observed in Mel under salt stress conditions. The benefits of Mel were more pronounced in Egypt, where grain yield increased by 52.91%, suggesting that local environmental factors significantly influence its efficacy. Its impact varied across different cultivars, with Jimai_22 increased root length by 70.83% and Sids_14 by 56.39% compared to nMel, emphasising the importance of genetic factors. Mel application under salt and Cd stress conditions increased root weight by 336% and 470%, respectively, while decreased by 87% under waterlogging compared to no stress conditions. This indicates that Mel greatly increased plant resistance to abiotic stresses by modulating stress-responsive pathways and improving agronomic traits.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jac.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本荟萃分析评估了褪黑素(Mel)对各种小麦农艺性状的影响,揭示了显著的异质性和潜在的发表偏倚。这一综合分析强调了研究间的可变性(I2 >;(总体、叶面积、根和芽重为98%),表明在分析研究中有选择性报告的潜力。籽粒产量和根重I2值分别为93.78%和99.54%,证实了褪黑素影响的复杂性,这需要使用随机效应模型。值得注意的是,该研究揭示了小麦性状的显著异质性(p <;0.05)。与不施褪黑素的对照组相比,施褪黑素使籽粒产量提高了33.50%,并对根和茎重产生了正影响;nMel)。然而,不同的Mel浓度、不同的施用方式和不同的环境应激源对其影响存在差异。与不施用梅尔相比,施用梅尔显著提高了籽粒产量,其中叶面喷施的产量提高了41.40%。籽粒产量、粒重、根长、茎长、叶面积、株高、茎重和根重的总响应比(lnRR)均比nMel提高了33.50%、24.01%、21.28%、32.99%、36.33%、15.94%、22.14%和20.86%。与非盐胁迫相比,盐胁迫条件下盐胁迫的籽粒产量最为显著。在埃及,Mel的效益更为明显,粮食产量提高了52.91%,表明当地环境因素对其效果有显著影响。与nMel相比,Jimai_22的根长增加了70.83%,Sids_14的根长增加了56.39%,表明遗传因素的重要性。在盐胁迫和镉胁迫下,施用Mel可使根重分别增加336%和470%,而在涝渍条件下则比无胁迫条件下减少87%。这表明Mel通过调节胁迫响应途径和改善农艺性状,极大地提高了植物对非生物胁迫的抗性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Melatonin Application on Wheat Agronomic Traits Under Abiotic Stress: A Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis assesses the effects of melatonin (Mel) on various wheat agronomic traits, revealing significant heterogeneity and potential publication bias. This comprehensive analysis highlights the variability across studies (I2 > 98% for overall, leaf area, root and shoot weight), indicating a potential for selective reporting in the analysed studies. Grain yield and root weight showed I2 values of 93.78% and 99.54%, respectively, confirming the complex nature of melatonin's impact, which necessitates the use of random-effects models. Notably, the study uncovers significant heterogeneity in wheat traits (p < 0.05). Mel increased grain yield by 33.50% and positively influenced root and shoot weights compared to control (no melatonin; nMel). However, the effects varied across different Mel concentration, application method and environmental stressors. Grain yield significantly increased with Mel application, particularly in foliar spray by 41.40%, compared to nMel. Mel consistently enhanced the overall response ratio (lnRR) of grain yield, grain weight, root length, shoot length, leaf area, plant height, shoot weight and root weight by 33.50%, 24.01%, 21.28%, 32.99%, 36.33%, 15.94%, 22.14% and 20.86% compared to nMel. Compared to nMel, the most pronounced grain yield was observed in Mel under salt stress conditions. The benefits of Mel were more pronounced in Egypt, where grain yield increased by 52.91%, suggesting that local environmental factors significantly influence its efficacy. Its impact varied across different cultivars, with Jimai_22 increased root length by 70.83% and Sids_14 by 56.39% compared to nMel, emphasising the importance of genetic factors. Mel application under salt and Cd stress conditions increased root weight by 336% and 470%, respectively, while decreased by 87% under waterlogging compared to no stress conditions. This indicates that Mel greatly increased plant resistance to abiotic stresses by modulating stress-responsive pathways and improving agronomic traits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7.8 months
期刊介绍: The effects of stress on crop production of agricultural cultivated plants will grow to paramount importance in the 21st century, and the Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science aims to assist in understanding these challenges. In this context, stress refers to extreme conditions under which crops and forages grow. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on the general and special science of abiotic plant stress. Specific topics include: drought, including water-use efficiency, such as salinity, alkaline and acidic stress, extreme temperatures since heat, cold and chilling stress limit the cultivation of crops, flooding and oxidative stress, and means of restricting them. Special attention is on research which have the topic of narrowing the yield gap. The Journal will give preference to field research and studies on plant stress highlighting these subsections. Particular regard is given to application-oriented basic research and applied research. The application of the scientific principles of agricultural crop experimentation is an essential prerequisite for the publication. Studies based on field experiments must show that they have been repeated (at least three times) on the same organism or have been conducted on several different varieties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信