{"title":"英国RSV患儿抗病毒治疗的成本效益","authors":"Yonas Gebrecherkos, David Hodgson","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a common cause of hospitalisation in infants worldwide, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, the antiviral treatment, Ziresovir, has shown promising results in a Phase III trial conducted on infants hospitalised with RSV. Based on these topline results, this study aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of Ziresovir in the United Kingdom (UK).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cost-effective analysis (CEA) uses a proportional outcomes model using data from topline reports by the AIRFLO trial and published data to explore the effect of Ziresovir administration on hospitalised infants aged <24 months at admission. We estimated the reduction in ICU bed days and deaths and the maximum cost-effective price (MCEP) per treated individual, assuming a threshold of £20,000 per Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Administering Ziresovir to all hospitalised infants averts four deaths (range: 2.8–4.5), 216 ICU admissions (range:160–260) and 3169 ICU bed-days (range: 2348–3804) per annum, the MCEP for Ziresovir per hospitalised infant is £429.65 (95 % CrI: £236–£771). If preterm infants are targeted, then the MCEP increases to £2108.38 (95 % Crl: £870–£3540). The MCEP for exclusively treating Infants with Chronic Lung Disease (CLD) and Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) is £6557.24 (95 % Crl: £1250 - £14,920) and £9459.44 (95 % Crl £3350–£20,300) respectively. The model is highly sensitive to changes in the efficacy of Ziresovir and the risk of ICU admission and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ziresovir is a cost-effective intervention for all infants hospitalised with RSV if priced below £430 per dose and strategies that exclusively treat high-risk- with CLD and CHD infants justify a higher price of £6558 and £9460 respectively. The outcomes are highly sensitive to the efficacy of Ziresovir and can be improved when the full results of the AIRFLO trial are available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 126647"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of anti-viral treatment for infants with RSV disease in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Yonas Gebrecherkos, David Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a common cause of hospitalisation in infants worldwide, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, the antiviral treatment, Ziresovir, has shown promising results in a Phase III trial conducted on infants hospitalised with RSV. Based on these topline results, this study aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of Ziresovir in the United Kingdom (UK).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cost-effective analysis (CEA) uses a proportional outcomes model using data from topline reports by the AIRFLO trial and published data to explore the effect of Ziresovir administration on hospitalised infants aged <24 months at admission. We estimated the reduction in ICU bed days and deaths and the maximum cost-effective price (MCEP) per treated individual, assuming a threshold of £20,000 per Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Administering Ziresovir to all hospitalised infants averts four deaths (range: 2.8–4.5), 216 ICU admissions (range:160–260) and 3169 ICU bed-days (range: 2348–3804) per annum, the MCEP for Ziresovir per hospitalised infant is £429.65 (95 % CrI: £236–£771). If preterm infants are targeted, then the MCEP increases to £2108.38 (95 % Crl: £870–£3540). The MCEP for exclusively treating Infants with Chronic Lung Disease (CLD) and Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) is £6557.24 (95 % Crl: £1250 - £14,920) and £9459.44 (95 % Crl £3350–£20,300) respectively. The model is highly sensitive to changes in the efficacy of Ziresovir and the risk of ICU admission and mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ziresovir is a cost-effective intervention for all infants hospitalised with RSV if priced below £430 per dose and strategies that exclusively treat high-risk- with CLD and CHD infants justify a higher price of £6558 and £9460 respectively. The outcomes are highly sensitive to the efficacy of Ziresovir and can be improved when the full results of the AIRFLO trial are available.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401329X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401329X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost-effectiveness of anti-viral treatment for infants with RSV disease in the United Kingdom
Background
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a common cause of hospitalisation in infants worldwide, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, the antiviral treatment, Ziresovir, has shown promising results in a Phase III trial conducted on infants hospitalised with RSV. Based on these topline results, this study aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of Ziresovir in the United Kingdom (UK).
Methods
The cost-effective analysis (CEA) uses a proportional outcomes model using data from topline reports by the AIRFLO trial and published data to explore the effect of Ziresovir administration on hospitalised infants aged <24 months at admission. We estimated the reduction in ICU bed days and deaths and the maximum cost-effective price (MCEP) per treated individual, assuming a threshold of £20,000 per Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained.
Results
Administering Ziresovir to all hospitalised infants averts four deaths (range: 2.8–4.5), 216 ICU admissions (range:160–260) and 3169 ICU bed-days (range: 2348–3804) per annum, the MCEP for Ziresovir per hospitalised infant is £429.65 (95 % CrI: £236–£771). If preterm infants are targeted, then the MCEP increases to £2108.38 (95 % Crl: £870–£3540). The MCEP for exclusively treating Infants with Chronic Lung Disease (CLD) and Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) is £6557.24 (95 % Crl: £1250 - £14,920) and £9459.44 (95 % Crl £3350–£20,300) respectively. The model is highly sensitive to changes in the efficacy of Ziresovir and the risk of ICU admission and mortality.
Conclusion
Ziresovir is a cost-effective intervention for all infants hospitalised with RSV if priced below £430 per dose and strategies that exclusively treat high-risk- with CLD and CHD infants justify a higher price of £6558 and £9460 respectively. The outcomes are highly sensitive to the efficacy of Ziresovir and can be improved when the full results of the AIRFLO trial are available.
期刊介绍:
Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.