{"title":"在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸中使用物理治疗性脊柱侧凸专项训练的强化康复计划的益处。","authors":"Jean-François Catanzariti, Fabien Moretto, Quentin Hanot, Chloé Adam, Gemma Renaud, Anthony Brouillard","doi":"10.7759/cureus.76359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) affects 3% of adolescents. Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis Specific Exercises (PSSE) are recommended to limit AIS progression, especially within intensive multidisciplinary programs. Our study evaluated the efficiency of these programs in AIS cases with a high progression risk. Methods We conducted a controlled retrospective observational study using data collected from a multicenter cohort that was prospectively collected. One hundred and forty-three major AIS cases with a high progression risk, treated with a corrective brace, were included and divided into two matched groups. In the PSSE group, 72 adolescents followed an intensive 4-week PSSE rehabilitation program; in the control group, 71 adolescents did not follow this program. Patient files were assessed at V0 (inclusion), V1 (6 to 12 months after V0) and V2 (≥ 6 months after V1). The evaluation criteria were: change in Cobb angle and percentage of patients reaching surgical stage at V2. Results At V1, 54.2% of patients in the PSSE group showed improvement compared to 16.9% in the control group (p < 0.001). In contrast, 38.9% of patients in the PSSE group were stabilized, compared to 53.3% in the control group (p = 0.2). At V2, 34.7% of patients in the PSSE group improved compared to 15.5.% in the control group (p <0.006). At V2, 55.6% of patients in the PSSE group were stabilised versus 40.8% in the control group (p < 0.05). At V2, 8.3% of patients in the PSSE group reached the surgical stage versus 21.1% in the control group (p = 0.005). Conclusion Our study is an additional argument in favor of using PSSE rehabilitation in AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"16 12","pages":"e76359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of Intensive Rehabilitation Programs Using Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-François Catanzariti, Fabien Moretto, Quentin Hanot, Chloé Adam, Gemma Renaud, Anthony Brouillard\",\"doi\":\"10.7759/cureus.76359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) affects 3% of adolescents. Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis Specific Exercises (PSSE) are recommended to limit AIS progression, especially within intensive multidisciplinary programs. Our study evaluated the efficiency of these programs in AIS cases with a high progression risk. Methods We conducted a controlled retrospective observational study using data collected from a multicenter cohort that was prospectively collected. One hundred and forty-three major AIS cases with a high progression risk, treated with a corrective brace, were included and divided into two matched groups. In the PSSE group, 72 adolescents followed an intensive 4-week PSSE rehabilitation program; in the control group, 71 adolescents did not follow this program. Patient files were assessed at V0 (inclusion), V1 (6 to 12 months after V0) and V2 (≥ 6 months after V1). The evaluation criteria were: change in Cobb angle and percentage of patients reaching surgical stage at V2. Results At V1, 54.2% of patients in the PSSE group showed improvement compared to 16.9% in the control group (p < 0.001). In contrast, 38.9% of patients in the PSSE group were stabilized, compared to 53.3% in the control group (p = 0.2). At V2, 34.7% of patients in the PSSE group improved compared to 15.5.% in the control group (p <0.006). At V2, 55.6% of patients in the PSSE group were stabilised versus 40.8% in the control group (p < 0.05). At V2, 8.3% of patients in the PSSE group reached the surgical stage versus 21.1% in the control group (p = 0.005). Conclusion Our study is an additional argument in favor of using PSSE rehabilitation in AIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cureus\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"e76359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cureus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Benefits of Intensive Rehabilitation Programs Using Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercises in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Purpose Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) affects 3% of adolescents. Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis Specific Exercises (PSSE) are recommended to limit AIS progression, especially within intensive multidisciplinary programs. Our study evaluated the efficiency of these programs in AIS cases with a high progression risk. Methods We conducted a controlled retrospective observational study using data collected from a multicenter cohort that was prospectively collected. One hundred and forty-three major AIS cases with a high progression risk, treated with a corrective brace, were included and divided into two matched groups. In the PSSE group, 72 adolescents followed an intensive 4-week PSSE rehabilitation program; in the control group, 71 adolescents did not follow this program. Patient files were assessed at V0 (inclusion), V1 (6 to 12 months after V0) and V2 (≥ 6 months after V1). The evaluation criteria were: change in Cobb angle and percentage of patients reaching surgical stage at V2. Results At V1, 54.2% of patients in the PSSE group showed improvement compared to 16.9% in the control group (p < 0.001). In contrast, 38.9% of patients in the PSSE group were stabilized, compared to 53.3% in the control group (p = 0.2). At V2, 34.7% of patients in the PSSE group improved compared to 15.5.% in the control group (p <0.006). At V2, 55.6% of patients in the PSSE group were stabilised versus 40.8% in the control group (p < 0.05). At V2, 8.3% of patients in the PSSE group reached the surgical stage versus 21.1% in the control group (p = 0.005). Conclusion Our study is an additional argument in favor of using PSSE rehabilitation in AIS.