纵向综合见习中问题学习与团队学习的结合:学生如何利用自主学习时间?

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1111/tct.70008
Ida Sara Johnsen, Vidar Gynnild, Børge Lillebo
{"title":"纵向综合见习中问题学习与团队学习的结合:学生如何利用自主学习时间?","authors":"Ida Sara Johnsen,&nbsp;Vidar Gynnild,&nbsp;Børge Lillebo","doi":"10.1111/tct.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Self-study is essential for student learning, and active learning methods aim to facilitate constructive self-study time usage. How active learning strategies actually affect student self-study in medical education, however, remains partly unknown. The aim of this study was to examine medical students' use of self-study time in a longitudinal integrated clerkship employing active learning strategies. Week-long time logs were used to collect quantitative data on students' scholastic activities. Furthermore, semistructured individual interviews were conducted for in-depth exploration of different learning activities' influence on students' self-study behaviour. Preparation for and follow-up work after scheduled learning activities were specifically addressed. Students spent on average 42.1 h per week on educational activities, of which self-study comprised 23 h. Preparation for upcoming learning activities was highly prioritized by the students. Team-based learning (TBL) generated most self-study hours, closely followed by patient encounters, while problem-based learning (PBL) induced least amounts of self-study. 50% of self-study time was done without specific relation to scheduled learning activities. Active learning methods appear to promote preparatory work, in accordance with their pedagogic theory. Type of learning activity appears to be decisive in determining the amount of self-study students choose to undertake. Future research should address how quantity and content of different learning activities influence self-study behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Problem-Based Learning and Team-Based Learning in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship: How Do Students Spend Their Self-Study Time?\",\"authors\":\"Ida Sara Johnsen,&nbsp;Vidar Gynnild,&nbsp;Børge Lillebo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Self-study is essential for student learning, and active learning methods aim to facilitate constructive self-study time usage. How active learning strategies actually affect student self-study in medical education, however, remains partly unknown. The aim of this study was to examine medical students' use of self-study time in a longitudinal integrated clerkship employing active learning strategies. Week-long time logs were used to collect quantitative data on students' scholastic activities. Furthermore, semistructured individual interviews were conducted for in-depth exploration of different learning activities' influence on students' self-study behaviour. Preparation for and follow-up work after scheduled learning activities were specifically addressed. Students spent on average 42.1 h per week on educational activities, of which self-study comprised 23 h. Preparation for upcoming learning activities was highly prioritized by the students. Team-based learning (TBL) generated most self-study hours, closely followed by patient encounters, while problem-based learning (PBL) induced least amounts of self-study. 50% of self-study time was done without specific relation to scheduled learning activities. Active learning methods appear to promote preparatory work, in accordance with their pedagogic theory. Type of learning activity appears to be decisive in determining the amount of self-study students choose to undertake. Future research should address how quantity and content of different learning activities influence self-study behaviour.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669489/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自学对学生的学习至关重要,积极的学习方法旨在促进建设性地利用自学时间。然而,在医学教育中,主动学习策略实际上如何影响学生的自学,仍然是部分未知的。摘要本研究旨在探讨医学生在纵向整合实习中运用主动学习策略的自学时间使用情况。一周的时间日志被用来收集学生学习活动的定量数据。通过半结构化的个体访谈,深入探讨不同学习活动对学生自主学习行为的影响。具体讨论了预定学习活动的准备工作和后续工作。学生平均每周花在教育活动上的时间为42.1小时,其中自学时间为23小时。学生们非常重视为即将到来的学习活动做准备。以团队为基础的学习(TBL)产生了最多的自学时间,紧随其后的是与患者的接触,而以问题为基础的学习(PBL)产生的自学时间最少。50%的自学时间与计划的学习活动没有特别的关系。根据他们的教育学理论,主动学习方法似乎促进了准备工作。学习活动的类型似乎是决定学生选择进行自学的数量的决定性因素。未来的研究应探讨不同学习活动的数量和内容如何影响自主学习行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining Problem-Based Learning and Team-Based Learning in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship: How Do Students Spend Their Self-Study Time?

Self-study is essential for student learning, and active learning methods aim to facilitate constructive self-study time usage. How active learning strategies actually affect student self-study in medical education, however, remains partly unknown. The aim of this study was to examine medical students' use of self-study time in a longitudinal integrated clerkship employing active learning strategies. Week-long time logs were used to collect quantitative data on students' scholastic activities. Furthermore, semistructured individual interviews were conducted for in-depth exploration of different learning activities' influence on students' self-study behaviour. Preparation for and follow-up work after scheduled learning activities were specifically addressed. Students spent on average 42.1 h per week on educational activities, of which self-study comprised 23 h. Preparation for upcoming learning activities was highly prioritized by the students. Team-based learning (TBL) generated most self-study hours, closely followed by patient encounters, while problem-based learning (PBL) induced least amounts of self-study. 50% of self-study time was done without specific relation to scheduled learning activities. Active learning methods appear to promote preparatory work, in accordance with their pedagogic theory. Type of learning activity appears to be decisive in determining the amount of self-study students choose to undertake. Future research should address how quantity and content of different learning activities influence self-study behaviour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信