叙事任务中的创造性:探索创造性的新形式。

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Florent Vinchon, Valentin Gironnay, Todd Lubart
{"title":"叙事任务中的创造性:探索创造性的新形式。","authors":"Florent Vinchon, Valentin Gironnay, Todd Lubart","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence12120125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined generative artificial intelligences (GenAIs), as popularized by ChatGPT, in standardized creativity tests. Benchmarking GenAI against human performance, the results showed that ChatGPT demonstrated remarkable fluency in content generation, though the creative output was average. The random nature of AI creativity and the dependency on the richness of the training database require a reassessment of traditional creativity metrics, especially for AI. Our findings highlight the integral role humans play in guiding AI to foster genuine originality, suggesting the need for future research in human-AI co-creation and the development of robust AI creativity measurement mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GenAI Creativity in Narrative Tasks: Exploring New Forms of Creativity.\",\"authors\":\"Florent Vinchon, Valentin Gironnay, Todd Lubart\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jintelligence12120125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined generative artificial intelligences (GenAIs), as popularized by ChatGPT, in standardized creativity tests. Benchmarking GenAI against human performance, the results showed that ChatGPT demonstrated remarkable fluency in content generation, though the creative output was average. The random nature of AI creativity and the dependency on the richness of the training database require a reassessment of traditional creativity metrics, especially for AI. Our findings highlight the integral role humans play in guiding AI to foster genuine originality, suggesting the need for future research in human-AI co-creation and the development of robust AI creativity measurement mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678044/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12120125\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12120125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究在标准化创造力测试中考察了由ChatGPT推广的生成式人工智能(GenAIs)。将GenAI与人类的表现进行对比,结果表明,ChatGPT在内容生成方面表现出了非凡的流畅性,尽管创意输出一般。人工智能创造力的随机性和对训练数据库丰富性的依赖要求对传统的创造力指标进行重新评估,尤其是对人工智能而言。我们的研究结果强调了人类在引导人工智能培养真正的原创性方面发挥的不可或缺的作用,这表明未来需要研究人类与人工智能的共同创造,并开发强大的人工智能创造力衡量机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GenAI Creativity in Narrative Tasks: Exploring New Forms of Creativity.

This study examined generative artificial intelligences (GenAIs), as popularized by ChatGPT, in standardized creativity tests. Benchmarking GenAI against human performance, the results showed that ChatGPT demonstrated remarkable fluency in content generation, though the creative output was average. The random nature of AI creativity and the dependency on the richness of the training database require a reassessment of traditional creativity metrics, especially for AI. Our findings highlight the integral role humans play in guiding AI to foster genuine originality, suggesting the need for future research in human-AI co-creation and the development of robust AI creativity measurement mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信