早产儿稳定期间剪断脐带的挤奶:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Walid El-Naggar, Souvik Mitra, Jayani Abeysekera, Tim Disher, Christy Woolcott, Tara Hatfield, Douglas McMillan, Jon Dorling
{"title":"早产儿稳定期间剪断脐带的挤奶:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Walid El-Naggar, Souvik Mitra, Jayani Abeysekera, Tim Disher, Christy Woolcott, Tara Hatfield, Douglas McMillan, Jon Dorling","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of cut-umbilical cord milking (C-UCM) during stabilization of preterm infants after birth.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a pilot randomized controlled trial of initial resuscitation. Infants born to eligible, consenting women presenting in preterm labor at <32 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive either the standard practice of deferred cord clamping (DCC) for 30-60 seconds at birth or C-UCM while supporting breathing and following 30 seconds of DCC. The primary outcome was feasibility in terms of percentage recruitment, intervention compliance, safety, and study completion. Short-term clinical outcomes were collected. Analysis was by intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 133 pregnant women approached, 93 consented to participate (70%). Fifty infants delivered <32 weeks' gestation were randomized to either C-UCM (25) or DCC (25). Baseline characteristics of infants were similar. All participants completed the study. One infant in the C-UCM group and 5 infants in the DCC group did not receive the allocated intervention. Median (IQR) time to cord milking was 62 (54, 99) seconds and median (IQR) length of the cut-cord milked was 20 (14, 29) cm. C-UCM was not associated with increased adverse effects compared with DCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Milking of the long-cut cord after 30 seconds of DCC while supporting breathing was feasible and not associated with significant adverse effects. A larger randomized controlled trial is required to assess the efficacy and safety of this approach on clinical outcomes. C-UCM may be especially useful in situations when DCC is not feasible.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03852134.</p>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"114444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Milking of the Cut Cord During Stabilization of Infants Born Very Premature: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Walid El-Naggar, Souvik Mitra, Jayani Abeysekera, Tim Disher, Christy Woolcott, Tara Hatfield, Douglas McMillan, Jon Dorling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of cut-umbilical cord milking (C-UCM) during stabilization of preterm infants after birth.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a pilot randomized controlled trial of initial resuscitation. Infants born to eligible, consenting women presenting in preterm labor at <32 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive either the standard practice of deferred cord clamping (DCC) for 30-60 seconds at birth or C-UCM while supporting breathing and following 30 seconds of DCC. The primary outcome was feasibility in terms of percentage recruitment, intervention compliance, safety, and study completion. Short-term clinical outcomes were collected. Analysis was by intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 133 pregnant women approached, 93 consented to participate (70%). Fifty infants delivered <32 weeks' gestation were randomized to either C-UCM (25) or DCC (25). Baseline characteristics of infants were similar. All participants completed the study. One infant in the C-UCM group and 5 infants in the DCC group did not receive the allocated intervention. Median (IQR) time to cord milking was 62 (54, 99) seconds and median (IQR) length of the cut-cord milked was 20 (14, 29) cm. C-UCM was not associated with increased adverse effects compared with DCC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Milking of the long-cut cord after 30 seconds of DCC while supporting breathing was feasible and not associated with significant adverse effects. A larger randomized controlled trial is required to assess the efficacy and safety of this approach on clinical outcomes. C-UCM may be especially useful in situations when DCC is not feasible.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03852134.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"114444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨脐带截乳在早产儿产后稳定中的可行性。研究设计:这是一项初始复苏的随机对照试验。结果:在接触的133名孕妇中,93名同意参与(70%)。结论:在支持呼吸的情况下,在DCC 30秒后进行长剪脐带的挤奶是可行的,且没有明显的不良反应。需要更大规模的随机对照试验来评估这种方法对临床结果的有效性和安全性。在DCC不可行的情况下,C-UCM可能特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Milking of the Cut Cord During Stabilization of Infants Born Very Premature: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of cut-umbilical cord milking (C-UCM) during stabilization of preterm infants after birth.

Study design: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial of initial resuscitation. Infants born to eligible, consenting women presenting in preterm labor at <32 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive either the standard practice of deferred cord clamping (DCC) for 30-60 seconds at birth or C-UCM while supporting breathing and following 30 seconds of DCC. The primary outcome was feasibility in terms of percentage recruitment, intervention compliance, safety, and study completion. Short-term clinical outcomes were collected. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: Of the 133 pregnant women approached, 93 consented to participate (70%). Fifty infants delivered <32 weeks' gestation were randomized to either C-UCM (25) or DCC (25). Baseline characteristics of infants were similar. All participants completed the study. One infant in the C-UCM group and 5 infants in the DCC group did not receive the allocated intervention. Median (IQR) time to cord milking was 62 (54, 99) seconds and median (IQR) length of the cut-cord milked was 20 (14, 29) cm. C-UCM was not associated with increased adverse effects compared with DCC.

Conclusion: Milking of the long-cut cord after 30 seconds of DCC while supporting breathing was feasible and not associated with significant adverse effects. A larger randomized controlled trial is required to assess the efficacy and safety of this approach on clinical outcomes. C-UCM may be especially useful in situations when DCC is not feasible.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03852134.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatrics
Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
696
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy. Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to: General Pediatrics Pediatric Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine Allergy and Immunology Cardiology Critical Care Medicine Developmental-Behavioral Medicine Endocrinology Gastroenterology Hematology-Oncology Infectious Diseases Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Emergency Medicine Pulmonology Rheumatology Genetics Ethics Health Service Research Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信