偏好注视位置和注视位置:调节复合面部效应的两个因素。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Puneeth N Chakravarthula, Ansh K Soni, Miguel P Eckstein
{"title":"偏好注视位置和注视位置:调节复合面部效应的两个因素。","authors":"Puneeth N Chakravarthula, Ansh K Soni, Miguel P Eckstein","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.13.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans consistently land their first saccade to a face at a preferred fixation location (PFL). Humans also typically process faces as wholes, as evidenced by perceptual effects such as the composite face effect (CFE). However, not known is whether an individual's tendency to process faces as wholes varies with their gaze patterns on the face. Here, we investigated variation of the CFE with the PFL. We compared the strength of the CFE for two groups of observers who were screened to have their PFLs either higher up, closer to the eyes, or lower on the face, closer to the tip of the nose. During the task, observers maintained their gaze at either their own group's mean PFL or at the other group's mean PFL. We found that the top half of the face elicits a stronger CFE than the bottom half. Further, the strength of the CFE was modulated by the distance of the PFL from the eyes, such that individuals with a PFL closer to the eyes had a stronger CFE than those with a PFL closer to the mouth. Finally, the top-half CFE for both upper-lookers and lower-lookers was abolished when they fixated at a non-preferred location on the face. Our findings show that the CFE relies on internal face representations shaped by the long-term use of a consistent oculomotor strategy to view faces.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"24 13","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferred fixation position and gaze location: Two factors modulating the composite face effect.\",\"authors\":\"Puneeth N Chakravarthula, Ansh K Soni, Miguel P Eckstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.24.13.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Humans consistently land their first saccade to a face at a preferred fixation location (PFL). Humans also typically process faces as wholes, as evidenced by perceptual effects such as the composite face effect (CFE). However, not known is whether an individual's tendency to process faces as wholes varies with their gaze patterns on the face. Here, we investigated variation of the CFE with the PFL. We compared the strength of the CFE for two groups of observers who were screened to have their PFLs either higher up, closer to the eyes, or lower on the face, closer to the tip of the nose. During the task, observers maintained their gaze at either their own group's mean PFL or at the other group's mean PFL. We found that the top half of the face elicits a stronger CFE than the bottom half. Further, the strength of the CFE was modulated by the distance of the PFL from the eyes, such that individuals with a PFL closer to the eyes had a stronger CFE than those with a PFL closer to the mouth. Finally, the top-half CFE for both upper-lookers and lower-lookers was abolished when they fixated at a non-preferred location on the face. Our findings show that the CFE relies on internal face representations shaped by the long-term use of a consistent oculomotor strategy to view faces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"24 13\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681917/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.13.15\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.13.15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类总是在首选注视位置(PFL)上进行第一次扫视。人类通常也会将人脸作为一个整体来处理,如复合人脸效应(CFE)等感知效应就证明了这一点。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,一个人对面部的整体处理倾向是否会随着他们对面部的注视模式而变化。在这里,我们研究了CFE随PFL的变化。我们比较了两组被筛选的观察者的CFE强度,他们的PFLs要么更高,更靠近眼睛,要么更低,更靠近鼻尖。在任务中,观察者要么盯着自己组的平均PFL,要么盯着另一组的平均PFL。我们发现脸的上半部分比下半部分产生更强的CFE。此外,CFE的强度受到PFL与眼睛的距离的调节,因此PFL靠近眼睛的个体比PFL靠近嘴巴的个体有更强的CFE。最后,当注视面部非首选位置时,上半部分的CFE都被取消。我们的研究结果表明,CFE依赖于长期使用一致的动眼力策略形成的内部面部表征来观察面部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferred fixation position and gaze location: Two factors modulating the composite face effect.

Humans consistently land their first saccade to a face at a preferred fixation location (PFL). Humans also typically process faces as wholes, as evidenced by perceptual effects such as the composite face effect (CFE). However, not known is whether an individual's tendency to process faces as wholes varies with their gaze patterns on the face. Here, we investigated variation of the CFE with the PFL. We compared the strength of the CFE for two groups of observers who were screened to have their PFLs either higher up, closer to the eyes, or lower on the face, closer to the tip of the nose. During the task, observers maintained their gaze at either their own group's mean PFL or at the other group's mean PFL. We found that the top half of the face elicits a stronger CFE than the bottom half. Further, the strength of the CFE was modulated by the distance of the PFL from the eyes, such that individuals with a PFL closer to the eyes had a stronger CFE than those with a PFL closer to the mouth. Finally, the top-half CFE for both upper-lookers and lower-lookers was abolished when they fixated at a non-preferred location on the face. Our findings show that the CFE relies on internal face representations shaped by the long-term use of a consistent oculomotor strategy to view faces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信