温度变化:一个量项在概念上的重新调整。

IF 1.4 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Jon Dickinson
{"title":"温度变化:一个量项在概念上的重新调整。","authors":"Jon Dickinson","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, John McCaskey (2020) has proposed that the arrival of Daniel Fahrenheit's thermometers precipitated the eighteenth-century conceptual change of temperature. I examine the usage of the temperature term in the Philosophical Transactions for this period, leading from the creation of the Fahrenheit thermometer up to the first employment of numerical temperature within the journal, in which temperature is constituted by a numerical value. I identify four strands linking thermometry and meteorology to temperature's conceptual change: the weather data network of James Jurin; the dissemination and acclaim for Fahrenheit thermometers; a resurgence in the usage of temperature in meteorological writing; and both exploratory usage and a broadening of the term's extent as it realigned to thermometry. The realignment of temperature in this period cultivated a conception of temperature whereby it could be constituted by the numerical readings of a thermometer, a sense which had not existed previously. This historical survey demonstrates that a refinement of Joseph LaPorte's (2004) precisification account for conceptual change is required for it to accommodate temperature. I suggest two modifications: a greater potential flexibility in the term's extent, permitting the abandonment of previous senses, and the possibility for tacit conceptual changes that may proceed without stipulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"109 ","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temperature changes: The conceptual realignment of a quantity term.\",\"authors\":\"Jon Dickinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.12.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, John McCaskey (2020) has proposed that the arrival of Daniel Fahrenheit's thermometers precipitated the eighteenth-century conceptual change of temperature. I examine the usage of the temperature term in the Philosophical Transactions for this period, leading from the creation of the Fahrenheit thermometer up to the first employment of numerical temperature within the journal, in which temperature is constituted by a numerical value. I identify four strands linking thermometry and meteorology to temperature's conceptual change: the weather data network of James Jurin; the dissemination and acclaim for Fahrenheit thermometers; a resurgence in the usage of temperature in meteorological writing; and both exploratory usage and a broadening of the term's extent as it realigned to thermometry. The realignment of temperature in this period cultivated a conception of temperature whereby it could be constituted by the numerical readings of a thermometer, a sense which had not existed previously. This historical survey demonstrates that a refinement of Joseph LaPorte's (2004) precisification account for conceptual change is required for it to accommodate temperature. I suggest two modifications: a greater potential flexibility in the term's extent, permitting the abandonment of previous senses, and the possibility for tacit conceptual changes that may proceed without stipulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"47-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.12.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.12.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,John McCaskey(2020)提出Daniel Fahrenheit温度计的到来促成了18世纪温度概念的变化。我研究了这一时期《哲学学报》中温度术语的使用情况,从华氏温度计的发明到期刊中第一次使用数值温度,其中温度由数值组成。我确定了将温度测量和气象学与温度概念变化联系起来的四条线索:詹姆斯·尤林的天气数据网;华氏温度计的传播和赞誉;在气象写作中重新使用温度;探索性的用法和范围的扩大,因为它重新与测温学联系起来。在这一时期,温度的重新调整培养了一种温度的概念,即温度可以由温度计的数值读数构成,这种概念以前是不存在的。这一历史调查表明,Joseph LaPorte(2004)对概念变化的精确解释需要改进,以适应温度。我建议进行两种修改:在术语的范围上有更大的潜在灵活性,允许放弃以前的含义,以及可能在没有规定的情况下进行默契的概念变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temperature changes: The conceptual realignment of a quantity term.

Recently, John McCaskey (2020) has proposed that the arrival of Daniel Fahrenheit's thermometers precipitated the eighteenth-century conceptual change of temperature. I examine the usage of the temperature term in the Philosophical Transactions for this period, leading from the creation of the Fahrenheit thermometer up to the first employment of numerical temperature within the journal, in which temperature is constituted by a numerical value. I identify four strands linking thermometry and meteorology to temperature's conceptual change: the weather data network of James Jurin; the dissemination and acclaim for Fahrenheit thermometers; a resurgence in the usage of temperature in meteorological writing; and both exploratory usage and a broadening of the term's extent as it realigned to thermometry. The realignment of temperature in this period cultivated a conception of temperature whereby it could be constituted by the numerical readings of a thermometer, a sense which had not existed previously. This historical survey demonstrates that a refinement of Joseph LaPorte's (2004) precisification account for conceptual change is required for it to accommodate temperature. I suggest two modifications: a greater potential flexibility in the term's extent, permitting the abandonment of previous senses, and the possibility for tacit conceptual changes that may proceed without stipulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science is devoted to the integrated study of the history, philosophy and sociology of the sciences. The editors encourage contributions both in the long-established areas of the history of the sciences and the philosophy of the sciences and in the topical areas of historiography of the sciences, the sciences in relation to gender, culture and society and the sciences in relation to arts. The Journal is international in scope and content and publishes papers from a wide range of countries and cultural traditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信