美国药学院药物信息、文献评价及生物统计学课程的调查。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Justyna Fydrych , Faria Munir, Heather Ipema, Laura Koppen
{"title":"美国药学院药物信息、文献评价及生物统计学课程的调查。","authors":"Justyna Fydrych ,&nbsp;Faria Munir,&nbsp;Heather Ipema,&nbsp;Laura Koppen","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This survey assessed the current status of drug information education among US colleges of pharmacy, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In December 2022, an electronic survey was sent to 140 US colleges of pharmacy. Survey questions assessed curricular content, methods of delivery, and course activities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred two survey responses were received, which represented 78 colleges. Many colleges reported teaching drug information, literature evaluation, and biostatistics in separate courses, but about half of colleges combine these topics into one or two courses. Most drug information instruction occurred in the first two years of pharmacy school, and most instructional delivery was described as in-person. Didactic lectures were commonly used in drug information courses but about half of colleges also used active learning methods such as flipped classroom/team-based learning. Topics with which students struggled most included critically evaluating medical literature and summarizing basic biostatistics and research design methods. Responding colleges reported some course-related changes in the past five years and some permanent changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Colleges of pharmacy report a variety of course structures and instructional approaches to teach drug information topics. Active learning strategies are used by many colleges. Some colleges reported permanent changes to their drug information teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic. How best to teach the drug information topics that students struggle with as reported by survey respondents remains an area for future study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 102270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of drug information, literature evaluation, and biostatistics curricula among US colleges of pharmacy\",\"authors\":\"Justyna Fydrych ,&nbsp;Faria Munir,&nbsp;Heather Ipema,&nbsp;Laura Koppen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This survey assessed the current status of drug information education among US colleges of pharmacy, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In December 2022, an electronic survey was sent to 140 US colleges of pharmacy. Survey questions assessed curricular content, methods of delivery, and course activities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred two survey responses were received, which represented 78 colleges. Many colleges reported teaching drug information, literature evaluation, and biostatistics in separate courses, but about half of colleges combine these topics into one or two courses. Most drug information instruction occurred in the first two years of pharmacy school, and most instructional delivery was described as in-person. Didactic lectures were commonly used in drug information courses but about half of colleges also used active learning methods such as flipped classroom/team-based learning. Topics with which students struggled most included critically evaluating medical literature and summarizing basic biostatistics and research design methods. Responding colleges reported some course-related changes in the past five years and some permanent changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Colleges of pharmacy report a variety of course structures and instructional approaches to teach drug information topics. Active learning strategies are used by many colleges. Some colleges reported permanent changes to their drug information teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic. How best to teach the drug information topics that students struggle with as reported by survey respondents remains an area for future study.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 102270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724003022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724003022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解美国药学院药物信息教育现状,包括新冠肺炎疫情对高校药物信息教育的影响。方法:于2022年12月对美国140所药学院进行电子调查。调查问题评估了课程内容、教学方法和课程活动。结果:共收到102份调查回复,代表78所高校。据报道,许多大学将药物信息、文献评价和生物统计学分开进行教学,但约有一半的大学将这些主题合并为一门或两门课程。大多数药物信息教学发生在药学院的前两年,并且大多数教学交付被描述为面对面。药物信息课程通常采用说教式授课,但约有一半的大学也采用主动学习方法,如翻转课堂/团队学习。学生们最纠结的题目包括批判性地评价医学文献,总结基本的生物统计学和研究设计方法。回应的大学报告了过去五年与课程相关的一些变化,以及由于COVID-19大流行而导致的一些永久性变化。结论:药学院报告了多种课程结构和教学方法来教授药物信息主题。许多大学都采用主动学习策略。一些大学报告称,由于新冠肺炎大流行,他们的药物信息教学发生了永久性变化。如何最好地教授学生在调查受访者报告中挣扎的药物信息主题仍然是未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey of drug information, literature evaluation, and biostatistics curricula among US colleges of pharmacy

Objective

This survey assessed the current status of drug information education among US colleges of pharmacy, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

In December 2022, an electronic survey was sent to 140 US colleges of pharmacy. Survey questions assessed curricular content, methods of delivery, and course activities.

Results

One hundred two survey responses were received, which represented 78 colleges. Many colleges reported teaching drug information, literature evaluation, and biostatistics in separate courses, but about half of colleges combine these topics into one or two courses. Most drug information instruction occurred in the first two years of pharmacy school, and most instructional delivery was described as in-person. Didactic lectures were commonly used in drug information courses but about half of colleges also used active learning methods such as flipped classroom/team-based learning. Topics with which students struggled most included critically evaluating medical literature and summarizing basic biostatistics and research design methods. Responding colleges reported some course-related changes in the past five years and some permanent changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

Colleges of pharmacy report a variety of course structures and instructional approaches to teach drug information topics. Active learning strategies are used by many colleges. Some colleges reported permanent changes to their drug information teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic. How best to teach the drug information topics that students struggle with as reported by survey respondents remains an area for future study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信