跨境处方:应对跨境电子处方的挑战和机遇,以增强药物获取和安全性。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Reelika Jõgi, Johanna Timonen, Leena Saastamoinen, Ott Laius, Daisy Volmer
{"title":"跨境处方:应对跨境电子处方的挑战和机遇,以增强药物获取和安全性。","authors":"Reelika Jõgi, Johanna Timonen, Leena Saastamoinen, Ott Laius, Daisy Volmer","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European cross-border electronic prescription (CBeP) was first introduced in Estonia and Finland. The CBeP service is gradually being implemented across Europe, prompting a need for practical studies to assess its benefits and potential shortcomings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate Estonian and Finnish pharmacists' experiences with patient identification, personal data protection and safe use of medications with CBeP, as well as main advantages and areas of development of CBeP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted among Estonian and Finnish pharmacists in Spring 2021. The survey was distributed to 664 community pharmacies (289 Estonian and 375 Finnish pharmacies) where CBePs had been dispensed in 2020. The data were analysed using frequencies and a chi-square test. Answers to open-ended questions were categorized using content analysis and quantifying.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 84 responses from Estonia and 154 responses from Finland were included in the study. Majority of the respondents had never or had rarely encountered problems with identifying the patient with CBeP. Nearly all respondents rated the CBeP system to be safe from the standpoint of personal data protection. Approximately 70 % of the respondents in both countries agreed that it is difficult to counsel the patient with CBeP due to language barrier. More than half of the respondents reported that it is not easy to monitor drug interactions with CBeP. The most often mentioned benefit of CBeP was an improved medication availability and the main problem the CBeP dispensing software rigidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Estonian and Finnish pharmacists recognize the positive impact of CBeP on medication availability. Variations in providing patient counselling due to language barriers highlight the need for improved communication tools. Addressing concerns about drug interaction monitoring and technical rigidity is essential for seamless cross-border adoption of CBeP in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing beyond borders: Navigating challenges and opportunities in cross-border ePrescriptions for enhanced medication access and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Reelika Jõgi, Johanna Timonen, Leena Saastamoinen, Ott Laius, Daisy Volmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European cross-border electronic prescription (CBeP) was first introduced in Estonia and Finland. The CBeP service is gradually being implemented across Europe, prompting a need for practical studies to assess its benefits and potential shortcomings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate Estonian and Finnish pharmacists' experiences with patient identification, personal data protection and safe use of medications with CBeP, as well as main advantages and areas of development of CBeP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted among Estonian and Finnish pharmacists in Spring 2021. The survey was distributed to 664 community pharmacies (289 Estonian and 375 Finnish pharmacies) where CBePs had been dispensed in 2020. The data were analysed using frequencies and a chi-square test. Answers to open-ended questions were categorized using content analysis and quantifying.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 84 responses from Estonia and 154 responses from Finland were included in the study. Majority of the respondents had never or had rarely encountered problems with identifying the patient with CBeP. Nearly all respondents rated the CBeP system to be safe from the standpoint of personal data protection. Approximately 70 % of the respondents in both countries agreed that it is difficult to counsel the patient with CBeP due to language barrier. More than half of the respondents reported that it is not easy to monitor drug interactions with CBeP. The most often mentioned benefit of CBeP was an improved medication availability and the main problem the CBeP dispensing software rigidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Estonian and Finnish pharmacists recognize the positive impact of CBeP on medication availability. Variations in providing patient counselling due to language barriers highlight the need for improved communication tools. Addressing concerns about drug interaction monitoring and technical rigidity is essential for seamless cross-border adoption of CBeP in Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:欧洲跨境电子处方(CBeP)最早在爱沙尼亚和芬兰推出。CBeP服务正在欧洲各地逐步实施,因此需要进行实际研究,以评估其好处和潜在的缺点。目的:本研究旨在了解爱沙尼亚和芬兰药剂师在使用CBeP进行患者识别、个人数据保护和安全用药方面的经验,以及CBeP的主要优势和发展方向。方法:于2021年春季对爱沙尼亚和芬兰的药剂师进行在线调查。该调查被分发到664家社区药店(289家爱沙尼亚药店和375家芬兰药店),这些药店在2020年分发了cbep。使用频率和卡方检验对数据进行分析。使用内容分析和量化对开放式问题的答案进行分类。结果:总共有84份来自爱沙尼亚的回复和154份来自芬兰的回复被纳入研究。大多数受访者从未或很少遇到识别CBeP患者的问题。从个人资料保护的角度来看,几乎所有受访者都认为CBeP系统是安全的。两国约70%的受访者认为,由于语言障碍,很难向CBeP患者提供咨询。超过一半的受访者报告说,监测药物与CBeP的相互作用并不容易。CBeP最常提到的好处是改善了药物可用性,主要问题是CBeP配药软件的刚性。结论:爱沙尼亚和芬兰的药剂师认识到CBeP对药物可用性的积极影响。由于语言障碍,在提供病人咨询方面的差异突出了改进沟通工具的必要性。解决对药物相互作用监测和技术刚性的担忧对于在欧洲无缝跨境采用CBeP至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescribing beyond borders: Navigating challenges and opportunities in cross-border ePrescriptions for enhanced medication access and safety.

Background: The European cross-border electronic prescription (CBeP) was first introduced in Estonia and Finland. The CBeP service is gradually being implemented across Europe, prompting a need for practical studies to assess its benefits and potential shortcomings.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate Estonian and Finnish pharmacists' experiences with patient identification, personal data protection and safe use of medications with CBeP, as well as main advantages and areas of development of CBeP.

Methods: An online survey was conducted among Estonian and Finnish pharmacists in Spring 2021. The survey was distributed to 664 community pharmacies (289 Estonian and 375 Finnish pharmacies) where CBePs had been dispensed in 2020. The data were analysed using frequencies and a chi-square test. Answers to open-ended questions were categorized using content analysis and quantifying.

Results: In total, 84 responses from Estonia and 154 responses from Finland were included in the study. Majority of the respondents had never or had rarely encountered problems with identifying the patient with CBeP. Nearly all respondents rated the CBeP system to be safe from the standpoint of personal data protection. Approximately 70 % of the respondents in both countries agreed that it is difficult to counsel the patient with CBeP due to language barrier. More than half of the respondents reported that it is not easy to monitor drug interactions with CBeP. The most often mentioned benefit of CBeP was an improved medication availability and the main problem the CBeP dispensing software rigidity.

Conclusions: Estonian and Finnish pharmacists recognize the positive impact of CBeP on medication availability. Variations in providing patient counselling due to language barriers highlight the need for improved communication tools. Addressing concerns about drug interaction monitoring and technical rigidity is essential for seamless cross-border adoption of CBeP in Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信