人工智能在当前药学实践中的应用:范围综述。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hatzimanolis Jessica, Riley Britney, El-Den Sarira, Aslani Parisa, Zhou Joe, Chaar Betty B
{"title":"人工智能在当前药学实践中的应用:范围综述。","authors":"Hatzimanolis Jessica, Riley Britney, El-Den Sarira, Aslani Parisa, Zhou Joe, Chaar Betty B","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of computer science, has been of growing research interest since its introduction to healthcare disciplines in the 1970s. Research has demonstrated that the application of such technologies has allowed for greater task accuracy and efficiency in medical disciplines such as diagnostics, treatment protocols and clinical decision-making. Application in pharmacy practice is reportedly narrower in scope; with greater emphasis placed on stock management and day-to-day function optimisation than enhancing patient outcomes. Despite this, new studies are underway to explore how AI technologies may be utilised in areas such as pharmacist interventions, medication adherence, and personalised medicine. Objective/s: The aim of this study was to identify current use of AI in measuring performance outcomes in pharmacy practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, IPA (International Pharmaceutical Abstracts), and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 1, 2018 to September 11, 2023, relevant to the aim. The final search strategy included the following terms: (\"artificial intelligence\") AND (\"pharmacy\" OR \"pharmacist\" OR \"pharmaceutical service\" OR \"pharmacy service\"). Reference lists of identified review articles were also screened.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 560 studies, of which seven met the inclusion criteria. These studies described the use of AI in pharmacy practice. All seven studies utilised models derived from machine learning AI techniques. AI identification of prescriptions requiring pharmacist intervention was the most frequent (n = 4), followed by screening services (n = 2), and patient-facing mobile applications (n = 1). These results indicated a workflow- and productivity-focused application of AI within current pharmacy practice, with minimal intention for direct patient health outcome improvement. Despite this, the review also revealed AI's potential in data collation and analytics to aid in pharmacist contribution towards the healthcare team and improvement of health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review has identified, from the literature available, three main areas of focus, (1) identification and classification of atypical or inappropriate medication orders, (2) improving efficiency of mass screening services, and (3) improving adherence and quality use of medicines. It also identified gaps in AI's current utility within the profession and its potential for day-to-day practice, as our understanding of general AI techniques continues to advance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applications of artificial intelligence in current pharmacy practice: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Hatzimanolis Jessica, Riley Britney, El-Den Sarira, Aslani Parisa, Zhou Joe, Chaar Betty B\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of computer science, has been of growing research interest since its introduction to healthcare disciplines in the 1970s. Research has demonstrated that the application of such technologies has allowed for greater task accuracy and efficiency in medical disciplines such as diagnostics, treatment protocols and clinical decision-making. Application in pharmacy practice is reportedly narrower in scope; with greater emphasis placed on stock management and day-to-day function optimisation than enhancing patient outcomes. Despite this, new studies are underway to explore how AI technologies may be utilised in areas such as pharmacist interventions, medication adherence, and personalised medicine. Objective/s: The aim of this study was to identify current use of AI in measuring performance outcomes in pharmacy practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, IPA (International Pharmaceutical Abstracts), and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 1, 2018 to September 11, 2023, relevant to the aim. The final search strategy included the following terms: (\\\"artificial intelligence\\\") AND (\\\"pharmacy\\\" OR \\\"pharmacist\\\" OR \\\"pharmaceutical service\\\" OR \\\"pharmacy service\\\"). Reference lists of identified review articles were also screened.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search identified 560 studies, of which seven met the inclusion criteria. These studies described the use of AI in pharmacy practice. All seven studies utilised models derived from machine learning AI techniques. AI identification of prescriptions requiring pharmacist intervention was the most frequent (n = 4), followed by screening services (n = 2), and patient-facing mobile applications (n = 1). These results indicated a workflow- and productivity-focused application of AI within current pharmacy practice, with minimal intention for direct patient health outcome improvement. Despite this, the review also revealed AI's potential in data collation and analytics to aid in pharmacist contribution towards the healthcare team and improvement of health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review has identified, from the literature available, three main areas of focus, (1) identification and classification of atypical or inappropriate medication orders, (2) improving efficiency of mass screening services, and (3) improving adherence and quality use of medicines. It also identified gaps in AI's current utility within the profession and its potential for day-to-day practice, as our understanding of general AI techniques continues to advance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.12.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)是计算机科学的一个分支,自20世纪70年代引入医疗保健学科以来,一直受到越来越多的研究兴趣。研究表明,这些技术的应用使诊断、治疗方案和临床决策等医学学科的任务更加准确和高效。据报道,在药学实践中的应用范围较窄;更强调库存管理和日常功能优化,而不是提高患者的治疗效果。尽管如此,新的研究正在进行中,以探索如何在药剂师干预、药物依从性和个性化医疗等领域利用人工智能技术。目的:本研究的目的是确定人工智能在衡量药房实践绩效结果中的当前使用情况。方法:根据PRISMA范围审查扩展(PRISMA- scr)进行范围审查。在MEDLINE、Embase、IPA (International Pharmaceutical Abstracts)和Web of Science数据库中检索2018年1月1日至2023年9月11日期间发表的与该目标相关的文章。最终的搜索策略包括以下术语:(“人工智能”)和(“药房”或“药剂师”或“药学服务”或“药学服务”)。筛选已确定的综述文章的参考文献列表。结果:文献检索共纳入560篇研究,其中7篇符合纳入标准。这些研究描述了人工智能在药学实践中的应用。所有七项研究都使用了源自机器学习人工智能技术的模型。人工智能识别需要药剂师干预的处方是最常见的(n = 4),其次是筛查服务(n = 2)和面向患者的移动应用(n = 1)。这些结果表明,人工智能在当前药房实践中的应用以工作流程和生产力为中心,对直接改善患者健康结果的意图最小。尽管如此,该综述还揭示了人工智能在数据整理和分析方面的潜力,以帮助药剂师为医疗团队做出贡献并改善健康结果。结论:从现有文献中,本综述确定了三个主要的重点领域,(1)非典型或不适当用药单的识别和分类,(2)提高大规模筛查服务的效率,(3)提高药物的依从性和使用质量。随着我们对通用人工智能技术的理解不断进步,它还确定了人工智能在当前职业中的应用差距及其在日常实践中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applications of artificial intelligence in current pharmacy practice: A scoping review.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of computer science, has been of growing research interest since its introduction to healthcare disciplines in the 1970s. Research has demonstrated that the application of such technologies has allowed for greater task accuracy and efficiency in medical disciplines such as diagnostics, treatment protocols and clinical decision-making. Application in pharmacy practice is reportedly narrower in scope; with greater emphasis placed on stock management and day-to-day function optimisation than enhancing patient outcomes. Despite this, new studies are underway to explore how AI technologies may be utilised in areas such as pharmacist interventions, medication adherence, and personalised medicine. Objective/s: The aim of this study was to identify current use of AI in measuring performance outcomes in pharmacy practice.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, IPA (International Pharmaceutical Abstracts), and Web of Science databases for articles published between January 1, 2018 to September 11, 2023, relevant to the aim. The final search strategy included the following terms: ("artificial intelligence") AND ("pharmacy" OR "pharmacist" OR "pharmaceutical service" OR "pharmacy service"). Reference lists of identified review articles were also screened.

Results: The literature search identified 560 studies, of which seven met the inclusion criteria. These studies described the use of AI in pharmacy practice. All seven studies utilised models derived from machine learning AI techniques. AI identification of prescriptions requiring pharmacist intervention was the most frequent (n = 4), followed by screening services (n = 2), and patient-facing mobile applications (n = 1). These results indicated a workflow- and productivity-focused application of AI within current pharmacy practice, with minimal intention for direct patient health outcome improvement. Despite this, the review also revealed AI's potential in data collation and analytics to aid in pharmacist contribution towards the healthcare team and improvement of health outcomes.

Conclusions: This scoping review has identified, from the literature available, three main areas of focus, (1) identification and classification of atypical or inappropriate medication orders, (2) improving efficiency of mass screening services, and (3) improving adherence and quality use of medicines. It also identified gaps in AI's current utility within the profession and its potential for day-to-day practice, as our understanding of general AI techniques continues to advance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信