[ACP和道德]。

Q4 Medicine
Michio Miyasaka
{"title":"[ACP和道德]。","authors":"Michio Miyasaka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the 1970s, medical ethics has evolved from an informal approach to a more structured public discourse. The 4 principles proposed by Beauchamp and Childress in 1979 have gained international recognition and are useful for organizing ethical issues. However, this methodology has its limitations, and dialogue-based ethics are becoming increasingly important. Healthcare providers face 2 conflicting responsibilities: delaying death and ensuring a peaceful death, which are central to ethical considerations. Additionally, Japan's lack of legal clarity on life-shortening procedures introduces further ethical challenges. The ethical issues in advance care planning(ACP)include:(1)the shift from informal to public discourse ethics, (2)developing a methodology with dual focuses on ethical principles and dialogue, and(3)the acceptance of life-shortening procedures based on autonomy. While ACP as a public-opinion ethics approach will face challenges in creating forums for discussion, especially on the topic of death, improving proficiency in ethical principles and dialogue-based methodologies among medical professionals may address some of these issues. The extent to which life-shortening procedures should be tolerated remains a significant challenge and necessitates prompt legislative development.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":"51 12","pages":"1200-1203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[ACP and Ethics].\",\"authors\":\"Michio Miyasaka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the 1970s, medical ethics has evolved from an informal approach to a more structured public discourse. The 4 principles proposed by Beauchamp and Childress in 1979 have gained international recognition and are useful for organizing ethical issues. However, this methodology has its limitations, and dialogue-based ethics are becoming increasingly important. Healthcare providers face 2 conflicting responsibilities: delaying death and ensuring a peaceful death, which are central to ethical considerations. Additionally, Japan's lack of legal clarity on life-shortening procedures introduces further ethical challenges. The ethical issues in advance care planning(ACP)include:(1)the shift from informal to public discourse ethics, (2)developing a methodology with dual focuses on ethical principles and dialogue, and(3)the acceptance of life-shortening procedures based on autonomy. While ACP as a public-opinion ethics approach will face challenges in creating forums for discussion, especially on the topic of death, improving proficiency in ethical principles and dialogue-based methodologies among medical professionals may address some of these issues. The extent to which life-shortening procedures should be tolerated remains a significant challenge and necessitates prompt legislative development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"51 12\",\"pages\":\"1200-1203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪70年代以来,医学伦理学已经从一种非正式的方法演变为一种更有组织的公共话语。波尚和柴尔德里斯在1979年提出的四项原则得到了国际上的认可,对组织伦理问题很有帮助。然而,这种方法有其局限性,基于对话的伦理正变得越来越重要。医疗服务提供者面临着两种相互冲突的责任:延迟死亡和确保和平死亡,这是伦理考虑的核心。此外,日本在缩短生命的过程中缺乏法律明确性,这带来了进一步的道德挑战。预先护理计划(ACP)中的伦理问题包括:(1)从非正式伦理到公共话语伦理的转变;(2)发展一种双重关注伦理原则和对话的方法论;(3)接受基于自主的缩短生命程序。虽然ACP作为一种舆论伦理方法在创建讨论论坛,特别是关于死亡问题的讨论论坛方面将面临挑战,但提高医疗专业人员对伦理原则和基于对话的方法的熟练程度,可能会解决其中一些问题。缩短生命的程序应容忍到何种程度仍然是一项重大挑战,需要迅速制定立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[ACP and Ethics].

Since the 1970s, medical ethics has evolved from an informal approach to a more structured public discourse. The 4 principles proposed by Beauchamp and Childress in 1979 have gained international recognition and are useful for organizing ethical issues. However, this methodology has its limitations, and dialogue-based ethics are becoming increasingly important. Healthcare providers face 2 conflicting responsibilities: delaying death and ensuring a peaceful death, which are central to ethical considerations. Additionally, Japan's lack of legal clarity on life-shortening procedures introduces further ethical challenges. The ethical issues in advance care planning(ACP)include:(1)the shift from informal to public discourse ethics, (2)developing a methodology with dual focuses on ethical principles and dialogue, and(3)the acceptance of life-shortening procedures based on autonomy. While ACP as a public-opinion ethics approach will face challenges in creating forums for discussion, especially on the topic of death, improving proficiency in ethical principles and dialogue-based methodologies among medical professionals may address some of these issues. The extent to which life-shortening procedures should be tolerated remains a significant challenge and necessitates prompt legislative development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信