用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗口腔下颌肌张力障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Toxins Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.3390/toxins16120546
Kazuya Yoshida, Ryuji Kaji
{"title":"用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗口腔下颌肌张力障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kazuya Yoshida, Ryuji Kaji","doi":"10.3390/toxins16120546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is a focal dystonia characterized by contractions of the masticatory, lingual, and other muscles of the stomatognathic system. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the impact and safety of botulinum toxin in OMD. The eligibility criteria were full-length original articles that provided data evaluating the efficacy and adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA injections in patients with OMD. PubMed and Embase were searched for articles published before 31 May 2023. We analyzed cases that showed a favorable response (>0% improvement), moderate or greater response (>50% improvement), and adverse effects. A fixed-model meta-analysis of 26 studies involving 1103 patients revealed that an overall favorable effect of onabotulinumtoxinA injection was observed in 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-97.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) of patients, with significant heterogeneity (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 85%). A moderate response (>50% improvement) was observed in 88.9% of patients (95% CI, 87-90.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) with significant heterogeneity (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 85%). Adverse effects were detected in 17.8% of patients, and the most common event was dysphagia (10.1%). Our systematic review found that onabotulinumtoxinA injection was effective, with a low rate of side effects. Further randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the evidence-based efficacy and adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA for Oromandibular Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuya Yoshida, Ryuji Kaji\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxins16120546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is a focal dystonia characterized by contractions of the masticatory, lingual, and other muscles of the stomatognathic system. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the impact and safety of botulinum toxin in OMD. The eligibility criteria were full-length original articles that provided data evaluating the efficacy and adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA injections in patients with OMD. PubMed and Embase were searched for articles published before 31 May 2023. We analyzed cases that showed a favorable response (>0% improvement), moderate or greater response (>50% improvement), and adverse effects. A fixed-model meta-analysis of 26 studies involving 1103 patients revealed that an overall favorable effect of onabotulinumtoxinA injection was observed in 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-97.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) of patients, with significant heterogeneity (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 85%). A moderate response (>50% improvement) was observed in 88.9% of patients (95% CI, 87-90.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) with significant heterogeneity (<i>p</i> < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 85%). Adverse effects were detected in 17.8% of patients, and the most common event was dysphagia (10.1%). Our systematic review found that onabotulinumtoxinA injection was effective, with a low rate of side effects. Further randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the evidence-based efficacy and adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxins\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16120546\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16120546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口腔颌面肌张力障碍(OMD)是一种局灶性肌张力障碍,其特征是咀嚼肌、舌肌和口颌系统的其他肌肉收缩。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以阐明肉毒毒素对OMD的影响和安全性。入选标准是提供数据评价单肉毒杆菌毒素注射对OMD患者的疗效和不良反应的全文原创文章。PubMed和Embase检索2023年5月31日之前发表的文章。我们分析了表现出良好反应(>0%改善)、中度或更大反应(>50%改善)和不良反应的病例。一项涉及1103例患者的26项研究的固定模型荟萃分析显示,注射onabotulinumtoxinA的患者中96.2%(95%可信区间[CI], 95-97.5%, p < 0.00001)的患者总体良好,具有显著的异质性(p < 0.00001, I2 = 85%)。88.9%的患者出现中度缓解(改善50%)(95% CI, 87-90.8%, p < 0.00001),异质性显著(p < 0.00001, I2 = 85%)。17.8%的患者出现不良反应,最常见的事件是吞咽困难(10.1%)。我们的系统综述发现,单肉毒杆菌毒素注射是有效的,副作用率低。需要进一步的随机对照试验来阐明循证疗效和不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA for Oromandibular Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is a focal dystonia characterized by contractions of the masticatory, lingual, and other muscles of the stomatognathic system. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the impact and safety of botulinum toxin in OMD. The eligibility criteria were full-length original articles that provided data evaluating the efficacy and adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA injections in patients with OMD. PubMed and Embase were searched for articles published before 31 May 2023. We analyzed cases that showed a favorable response (>0% improvement), moderate or greater response (>50% improvement), and adverse effects. A fixed-model meta-analysis of 26 studies involving 1103 patients revealed that an overall favorable effect of onabotulinumtoxinA injection was observed in 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-97.5%, p < 0.00001) of patients, with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.00001, I2 = 85%). A moderate response (>50% improvement) was observed in 88.9% of patients (95% CI, 87-90.8%, p < 0.00001) with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.00001, I2 = 85%). Adverse effects were detected in 17.8% of patients, and the most common event was dysphagia (10.1%). Our systematic review found that onabotulinumtoxinA injection was effective, with a low rate of side effects. Further randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the evidence-based efficacy and adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信