干扰素γ释放试验在癌症患者结核诊断中的应用。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Marjorie V Batista, Joseph Sassine, Fareed Khawaja, Prathit A Kulkarni, Georgios Angelidakis, Joumana Kmeid, Firas El Chaer, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Edward A Graviss, Victor E Mulanovich, Roy F Chemaly
{"title":"干扰素γ释放试验在癌症患者结核诊断中的应用。","authors":"Marjorie V Batista, Joseph Sassine, Fareed Khawaja, Prathit A Kulkarni, Georgios Angelidakis, Joumana Kmeid, Firas El Chaer, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Edward A Graviss, Victor E Mulanovich, Roy F Chemaly","doi":"10.1111/tid.14428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cancer are at elevated risk for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Diagnosis of latent TB infection and TB disease remains challenging in this patient population despite the advent of interferon-γ release assays (IGRA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with cancer who had IGRA testing (QuantiFERON-TB [QFT-TB] or T-SPOT.TB) at a major cancer center in the United States from June 2010 to July 2017. The results were analyzed with respect to the likelihood of latent TB infection and TB disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1299 patients were included with 1599 tests performed: 586 QFT-TB and 1013 T-SPOT.TB. Forty-nine (4%) patients were diagnosed with latent TB, and four (1%) with TB disease. T-SPOT.TB was more likely to yield an actionable result (positive or negative) than QFT-TB (89% vs. 65%, p < 0.001). The rate of indeterminate results for QFT-TB was higher than the rate of invalid results for T-SPOT.TB (35% and 10%, respectively, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of an invalid T-SPOT.TB included prior receipt of alemtuzumab, lower hemoglobin, absolute lymphocyte count, or serum albumin (p < 0.05 each), whereas the independent predictors of an indeterminate QFT-TB were female gender, prior receipt of systemic corticosteroids, and lower hemoglobin, or serum albumin or higher absolute neutrophil count (p < 0.05 each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T-SPOT.TB yielded more actionable results than QFT-TB in patients with cancer. T-SPOT.TB might be a better IGRA for screening for latent TB infection in patients with cancer, although a direct comparison would be needed to definitively determine this.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Interferon-γ Release Assays in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Patients With Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Marjorie V Batista, Joseph Sassine, Fareed Khawaja, Prathit A Kulkarni, Georgios Angelidakis, Joumana Kmeid, Firas El Chaer, Ella J Ariza-Heredia, Edward A Graviss, Victor E Mulanovich, Roy F Chemaly\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.14428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cancer are at elevated risk for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Diagnosis of latent TB infection and TB disease remains challenging in this patient population despite the advent of interferon-γ release assays (IGRA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with cancer who had IGRA testing (QuantiFERON-TB [QFT-TB] or T-SPOT.TB) at a major cancer center in the United States from June 2010 to July 2017. The results were analyzed with respect to the likelihood of latent TB infection and TB disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1299 patients were included with 1599 tests performed: 586 QFT-TB and 1013 T-SPOT.TB. Forty-nine (4%) patients were diagnosed with latent TB, and four (1%) with TB disease. T-SPOT.TB was more likely to yield an actionable result (positive or negative) than QFT-TB (89% vs. 65%, p < 0.001). The rate of indeterminate results for QFT-TB was higher than the rate of invalid results for T-SPOT.TB (35% and 10%, respectively, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of an invalid T-SPOT.TB included prior receipt of alemtuzumab, lower hemoglobin, absolute lymphocyte count, or serum albumin (p < 0.05 each), whereas the independent predictors of an indeterminate QFT-TB were female gender, prior receipt of systemic corticosteroids, and lower hemoglobin, or serum albumin or higher absolute neutrophil count (p < 0.05 each).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T-SPOT.TB yielded more actionable results than QFT-TB in patients with cancer. T-SPOT.TB might be a better IGRA for screening for latent TB infection in patients with cancer, although a direct comparison would be needed to definitively determine this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症患者结核病(TB)再激活的风险升高。尽管出现了干扰素γ释放法(IGRA),但在这一患者群体中,潜伏性结核感染和结核病的诊断仍然具有挑战性。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2010年6月至2017年7月在美国一家主要癌症中心进行IGRA检测(QuantiFERON-TB [QFT-TB]或T-SPOT.TB)的所有癌症患者的病历。结果分析了潜伏结核感染和结核疾病的可能性。结果:共纳入1299例患者,进行了1599项检测:586例QFT-TB和1013例T-SPOT.TB。49例(4%)患者被诊断为潜伏性结核病,4例(1%)患者被诊断为结核病。T-SPOT。TB比QFT-TB更有可能产生可操作的结果(阳性或阴性)(89%对65%,p < 0.001)。QFT-TB检测结果不确定的比率高于T-SPOT检测结果无效的比率。结核病(分别为35%和10%,p < 0.001)。在多变量分析上,T-SPOT无效的独立预测因子。TB包括先前接受阿仑单抗、较低的血红蛋白、绝对淋巴细胞计数或血清白蛋白(各p < 0.05),而不确定的QFT-TB的独立预测因子是女性、先前接受全身皮质类固醇、较低的血红蛋白、或血清白蛋白或较高的绝对中性粒细胞计数(各p < 0.05)。结论:T-SPOT。在癌症患者中,TB比QFT-TB产生更多可操作的结果。T-SPOT。结核病可能是筛查癌症患者潜伏结核感染的更好的IGRA,尽管需要直接比较才能明确确定这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Utility of Interferon-γ Release Assays in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Patients With Cancer.

Background: Patients with cancer are at elevated risk for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Diagnosis of latent TB infection and TB disease remains challenging in this patient population despite the advent of interferon-γ release assays (IGRA).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients with cancer who had IGRA testing (QuantiFERON-TB [QFT-TB] or T-SPOT.TB) at a major cancer center in the United States from June 2010 to July 2017. The results were analyzed with respect to the likelihood of latent TB infection and TB disease.

Results: A total of 1299 patients were included with 1599 tests performed: 586 QFT-TB and 1013 T-SPOT.TB. Forty-nine (4%) patients were diagnosed with latent TB, and four (1%) with TB disease. T-SPOT.TB was more likely to yield an actionable result (positive or negative) than QFT-TB (89% vs. 65%, p < 0.001). The rate of indeterminate results for QFT-TB was higher than the rate of invalid results for T-SPOT.TB (35% and 10%, respectively, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of an invalid T-SPOT.TB included prior receipt of alemtuzumab, lower hemoglobin, absolute lymphocyte count, or serum albumin (p < 0.05 each), whereas the independent predictors of an indeterminate QFT-TB were female gender, prior receipt of systemic corticosteroids, and lower hemoglobin, or serum albumin or higher absolute neutrophil count (p < 0.05 each).

Conclusions: T-SPOT.TB yielded more actionable results than QFT-TB in patients with cancer. T-SPOT.TB might be a better IGRA for screening for latent TB infection in patients with cancer, although a direct comparison would be needed to definitively determine this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信