亚利桑那州响尾蛇中毒后的抗蛇毒血清治疗不能直接减轻疼痛。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Toxins Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.3390/toxins16120521
Vance G Nielsen, Darien L Stratton, Tyler M Hoelscher, Hannah L Nakamura, Matthew M Cornelison, William F Rushton, Geoffrey T Smelski
{"title":"亚利桑那州响尾蛇中毒后的抗蛇毒血清治疗不能直接减轻疼痛。","authors":"Vance G Nielsen, Darien L Stratton, Tyler M Hoelscher, Hannah L Nakamura, Matthew M Cornelison, William F Rushton, Geoffrey T Smelski","doi":"10.3390/toxins16120521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The onset, progression, and severity of pain following rattlesnake envenomation are highly variable between patients. Pain can be severe and persistent, seemingly refractory to opioid analgesics. The ability of antivenom to directly relieve pain has not been well studied. We reviewed poison center charts of rattlesnake envenomations between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2022. Demographic data as well as details of antivenom usage and pain severity were collected. Patients were coded in one of three categories: without pain (Pain 0), well controlled pain (Pain 1), and opioid refractory pain (Pain 2). A total of 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 140 receiving Anavip antivenom and 149 receiving Crofab. Patient characteristics were different between both cohorts. There were no significant differences in the number of Anavip vials used between the Pain 1 and Pain 2 groups. However, patients in the Crofab Pain 2 group received more antivenom compared to Pain 1. Importantly, Pain 3 patients were treated with the highest amount of antivenom in both the Crofab and Anavip cohorts. Despite the higher doses of antivenom used, these patients also experienced the greatest pain. These data suggest that antivenom alone may have minimal analgesic benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antivenom Administration After Rattlesnake Envenoming in Arizona Does Not Directly Diminish Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Vance G Nielsen, Darien L Stratton, Tyler M Hoelscher, Hannah L Nakamura, Matthew M Cornelison, William F Rushton, Geoffrey T Smelski\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxins16120521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The onset, progression, and severity of pain following rattlesnake envenomation are highly variable between patients. Pain can be severe and persistent, seemingly refractory to opioid analgesics. The ability of antivenom to directly relieve pain has not been well studied. We reviewed poison center charts of rattlesnake envenomations between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2022. Demographic data as well as details of antivenom usage and pain severity were collected. Patients were coded in one of three categories: without pain (Pain 0), well controlled pain (Pain 1), and opioid refractory pain (Pain 2). A total of 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 140 receiving Anavip antivenom and 149 receiving Crofab. Patient characteristics were different between both cohorts. There were no significant differences in the number of Anavip vials used between the Pain 1 and Pain 2 groups. However, patients in the Crofab Pain 2 group received more antivenom compared to Pain 1. Importantly, Pain 3 patients were treated with the highest amount of antivenom in both the Crofab and Anavip cohorts. Despite the higher doses of antivenom used, these patients also experienced the greatest pain. These data suggest that antivenom alone may have minimal analgesic benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxins\",\"volume\":\"16 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728520/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16120521\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16120521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

响尾蛇中毒后疼痛的发作、进展和严重程度在患者之间有很大差异。疼痛可能是严重和持续的,似乎对阿片类镇痛药难治。抗蛇毒血清直接缓解疼痛的能力尚未得到很好的研究。我们回顾了2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日响尾蛇中毒的中毒中心图表。收集了人口统计数据以及抗蛇毒血清使用和疼痛严重程度的详细信息。患者分为三类:无疼痛(疼痛0)、控制良好的疼痛(疼痛1)和阿片类药物难治性疼痛(疼痛2)。共有289例患者符合纳入标准,其中140例接受Anavip抗蛇毒血清治疗,149例接受Crofab治疗。两组患者的特征不同。在疼痛1组和疼痛2组之间,使用Anavip小瓶的数量没有显著差异。然而,与疼痛1组相比,Crofab Pain 2组的患者接受了更多的抗蛇毒血清。重要的是,在Crofab组和Anavip组中,Pain 3组患者接受了最高剂量的抗蛇毒血清治疗。尽管使用了更高剂量的抗蛇毒血清,但这些患者也经历了最大的痛苦。这些数据表明,单独使用抗蛇毒血清可能只有最小的止痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antivenom Administration After Rattlesnake Envenoming in Arizona Does Not Directly Diminish Pain.

The onset, progression, and severity of pain following rattlesnake envenomation are highly variable between patients. Pain can be severe and persistent, seemingly refractory to opioid analgesics. The ability of antivenom to directly relieve pain has not been well studied. We reviewed poison center charts of rattlesnake envenomations between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2022. Demographic data as well as details of antivenom usage and pain severity were collected. Patients were coded in one of three categories: without pain (Pain 0), well controlled pain (Pain 1), and opioid refractory pain (Pain 2). A total of 289 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 140 receiving Anavip antivenom and 149 receiving Crofab. Patient characteristics were different between both cohorts. There were no significant differences in the number of Anavip vials used between the Pain 1 and Pain 2 groups. However, patients in the Crofab Pain 2 group received more antivenom compared to Pain 1. Importantly, Pain 3 patients were treated with the highest amount of antivenom in both the Crofab and Anavip cohorts. Despite the higher doses of antivenom used, these patients also experienced the greatest pain. These data suggest that antivenom alone may have minimal analgesic benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信