淋巴结阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检和钢丝定位夹住淋巴结活检的诊断准确性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Surgery Today Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0
Xinguang Wang, Qijun Zheng, Yingjian He, Yiqiang Liu, Ling Huo, Nan Zhang, Tianfeng Wang, Yuntao Xie, Jinfeng Li, Tao Ouyang, Zhaoqing Fan
{"title":"淋巴结阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检和钢丝定位夹住淋巴结活检的诊断准确性。","authors":"Xinguang Wang, Qijun Zheng, Yingjian He, Yiqiang Liu, Ling Huo, Nan Zhang, Tianfeng Wang, Yuntao Xie, Jinfeng Li, Tao Ouyang, Zhaoqing Fan","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis. The IR of SLNB and WLNB alone were 63.0% and 70.7%, respectively. The identification rate (IR) of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was 87.5%. The FNR of and NPV were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.0-11.8%) and 92.0% (95% CI 86.3-97.7%), respectively, for the TAD procedure, 17.1% (95% CI 8.2-25.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI:74.7-91.9%) for SLNB alone, and 6.7% (95% CI:1.5-12.0%) and 90.6% (95% CI:83.5-97.7%) for WLNB alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic performance of TAD using wire localization was similar to that of the procedure performed using radioactive seed localization. (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03715686).</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":"172-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy and wire localized clipped node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Xinguang Wang, Qijun Zheng, Yingjian He, Yiqiang Liu, Ling Huo, Nan Zhang, Tianfeng Wang, Yuntao Xie, Jinfeng Li, Tao Ouyang, Zhaoqing Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis. The IR of SLNB and WLNB alone were 63.0% and 70.7%, respectively. The identification rate (IR) of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was 87.5%. The FNR of and NPV were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.0-11.8%) and 92.0% (95% CI 86.3-97.7%), respectively, for the TAD procedure, 17.1% (95% CI 8.2-25.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI:74.7-91.9%) for SLNB alone, and 6.7% (95% CI:1.5-12.0%) and 90.6% (95% CI:83.5-97.7%) for WLNB alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic performance of TAD using wire localization was similar to that of the procedure performed using radioactive seed localization. (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03715686).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"172-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:NACT术后初始结节阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝分期的最佳方法仍不明确:方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性单中心试验,研究前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)结合夹标记结的线定位淋巴结活检(WLNB)作为新辅助化疗(NACT)后结节阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝分期技术的诊断效果:共有 233 例患者入选,其中 208 例纳入分析。单纯 SLNB 和 WLNB 的识别率分别为 63.0% 和 70.7%。腋窝靶向切除术(TAD)的识别率(IR)为 87.5%。TAD手术的FNR和NPV分别为6.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:2.0-11.8%)和92.0%(95% CI:86.3-97.7%),单纯SLNB手术的FNR和NPV分别为17.1%(95% CI:8.2-25.6%)和83.3%(95% CI:74.7-91.9%),单纯WLNB手术的FNR和NPV分别为6.7%(95% CI:1.5-12.0%)和90.6%(95% CI:83.5-97.7%):结论:使用线定位的TAD诊断效果与使用放射性粒子定位的手术效果相似。(临床试验注册:NCT03715686)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy and wire localized clipped node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.

Purpose: The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis. The IR of SLNB and WLNB alone were 63.0% and 70.7%, respectively. The identification rate (IR) of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was 87.5%. The FNR of and NPV were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.0-11.8%) and 92.0% (95% CI 86.3-97.7%), respectively, for the TAD procedure, 17.1% (95% CI 8.2-25.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI:74.7-91.9%) for SLNB alone, and 6.7% (95% CI:1.5-12.0%) and 90.6% (95% CI:83.5-97.7%) for WLNB alone.

Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of TAD using wire localization was similar to that of the procedure performed using radioactive seed localization. (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03715686).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信