Xinguang Wang, Qijun Zheng, Yingjian He, Yiqiang Liu, Ling Huo, Nan Zhang, Tianfeng Wang, Yuntao Xie, Jinfeng Li, Tao Ouyang, Zhaoqing Fan
{"title":"淋巴结阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检和钢丝定位夹住淋巴结活检的诊断准确性。","authors":"Xinguang Wang, Qijun Zheng, Yingjian He, Yiqiang Liu, Ling Huo, Nan Zhang, Tianfeng Wang, Yuntao Xie, Jinfeng Li, Tao Ouyang, Zhaoqing Fan","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis. The IR of SLNB and WLNB alone were 63.0% and 70.7%, respectively. The identification rate (IR) of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was 87.5%. The FNR of and NPV were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.0-11.8%) and 92.0% (95% CI 86.3-97.7%), respectively, for the TAD procedure, 17.1% (95% CI 8.2-25.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI:74.7-91.9%) for SLNB alone, and 6.7% (95% CI:1.5-12.0%) and 90.6% (95% CI:83.5-97.7%) for WLNB alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic performance of TAD using wire localization was similar to that of the procedure performed using radioactive seed localization. (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03715686).</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":"172-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy and wire localized clipped node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Xinguang Wang, Qijun Zheng, Yingjian He, Yiqiang Liu, Ling Huo, Nan Zhang, Tianfeng Wang, Yuntao Xie, Jinfeng Li, Tao Ouyang, Zhaoqing Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis. The IR of SLNB and WLNB alone were 63.0% and 70.7%, respectively. The identification rate (IR) of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was 87.5%. The FNR of and NPV were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.0-11.8%) and 92.0% (95% CI 86.3-97.7%), respectively, for the TAD procedure, 17.1% (95% CI 8.2-25.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI:74.7-91.9%) for SLNB alone, and 6.7% (95% CI:1.5-12.0%) and 90.6% (95% CI:83.5-97.7%) for WLNB alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic performance of TAD using wire localization was similar to that of the procedure performed using radioactive seed localization. (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03715686).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"172-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02981-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy and wire localized clipped node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer.
Purpose: The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis. The IR of SLNB and WLNB alone were 63.0% and 70.7%, respectively. The identification rate (IR) of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was 87.5%. The FNR of and NPV were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.0-11.8%) and 92.0% (95% CI 86.3-97.7%), respectively, for the TAD procedure, 17.1% (95% CI 8.2-25.6%) and 83.3% (95% CI:74.7-91.9%) for SLNB alone, and 6.7% (95% CI:1.5-12.0%) and 90.6% (95% CI:83.5-97.7%) for WLNB alone.
Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of TAD using wire localization was similar to that of the procedure performed using radioactive seed localization. (Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03715686).
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.