韩国一项全国性队列研究表明,高效力他汀类药物与卒中患者骨质疏松和骨折风险的关系

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jin Sook Jeong, Yunha Noh, Sun Wook Cho, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, Yongtai Cho, Ju-Young Shin, Hoon Kim
{"title":"韩国一项全国性队列研究表明,高效力他汀类药物与卒中患者骨质疏松和骨折风险的关系","authors":"Jin Sook Jeong, Yunha Noh, Sun Wook Cho, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, Yongtai Cho, Ju-Young Shin, Hoon Kim","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-81628-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate the risk of osteoporosis and fractures associated with higher-potency statin use compared to lower-potency statin use in patients with stroke, using data from the Health Insurance and Review Assessment database of South Korea (2010-2019). Patients who received statin within 30 days after hospitalization for a new-onset stroke (n = 276,911) were divided into higher-potency (n = 212,215, 76.6%) or lower-potency (n = 64,696, 23.4%) statin initiation groups. The primary outcome was a composite of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, including osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, hip fracture, and non-hip non-vertebral fracture. Cox proportional hazard models weighted by standardized morbidity ratios were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97), osteoporosis (0.93, 0.90-0.96), vertebral fracture (0.95, 0.91-0.99), and hip fracture (0.89, 0.84-0.95) were significantly lower in higher-potency statin users, while the risk for non-hip non-vertebral fracture was not significant (0.98, 0.95-1.02). The use of higher-potency statins compared to lower-potency statins was associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, and hip fracture in patients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"30825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of higher potency statin use with risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with stroke in a Korean nationwide cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Sook Jeong, Yunha Noh, Sun Wook Cho, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, Yongtai Cho, Ju-Young Shin, Hoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-024-81628-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate the risk of osteoporosis and fractures associated with higher-potency statin use compared to lower-potency statin use in patients with stroke, using data from the Health Insurance and Review Assessment database of South Korea (2010-2019). Patients who received statin within 30 days after hospitalization for a new-onset stroke (n = 276,911) were divided into higher-potency (n = 212,215, 76.6%) or lower-potency (n = 64,696, 23.4%) statin initiation groups. The primary outcome was a composite of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, including osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, hip fracture, and non-hip non-vertebral fracture. Cox proportional hazard models weighted by standardized morbidity ratios were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97), osteoporosis (0.93, 0.90-0.96), vertebral fracture (0.95, 0.91-0.99), and hip fracture (0.89, 0.84-0.95) were significantly lower in higher-potency statin users, while the risk for non-hip non-vertebral fracture was not significant (0.98, 0.95-1.02). The use of higher-potency statins compared to lower-potency statins was associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, and hip fracture in patients with stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"30825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81628-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81628-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项基于人群的队列研究旨在评估卒中患者使用高效他汀类药物与使用低效他汀类药物相关的骨质疏松和骨折风险,研究数据来自韩国健康保险和审查评估数据库(2010-2019)。新发卒中住院后30天内接受他汀类药物治疗的患者(n = 276,911)被分为高效(n = 212,215, 76.6%)和低效(n = 64,696, 23.4%)他汀类药物起始组。主要结局是骨质疏松和骨质疏松性骨折。次要结局是主要结局的单个组成部分,包括骨质疏松症、椎体骨折、髋部骨折和非髋部非椎体骨折。采用标准化发病率加权的Cox比例风险模型以95%置信区间(ci)估计风险比(hr)。高效他汀类药物使用者的综合结局(HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97)、骨质疏松(0.93,0.90-0.96)、椎体骨折(0.95,0.91-0.99)和髋部骨折(0.89,0.84-0.95)的风险显著降低,而非髋部非椎体骨折的风险无统计学意义(0.98,0.95-1.02)。与低效他汀类药物相比,高效他汀类药物的使用与卒中患者骨质疏松、椎体骨折和髋部骨折的风险较低相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of higher potency statin use with risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with stroke in a Korean nationwide cohort study.

Association of higher potency statin use with risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with stroke in a Korean nationwide cohort study.

Association of higher potency statin use with risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with stroke in a Korean nationwide cohort study.

Association of higher potency statin use with risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with stroke in a Korean nationwide cohort study.

This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate the risk of osteoporosis and fractures associated with higher-potency statin use compared to lower-potency statin use in patients with stroke, using data from the Health Insurance and Review Assessment database of South Korea (2010-2019). Patients who received statin within 30 days after hospitalization for a new-onset stroke (n = 276,911) were divided into higher-potency (n = 212,215, 76.6%) or lower-potency (n = 64,696, 23.4%) statin initiation groups. The primary outcome was a composite of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, including osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, hip fracture, and non-hip non-vertebral fracture. Cox proportional hazard models weighted by standardized morbidity ratios were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97), osteoporosis (0.93, 0.90-0.96), vertebral fracture (0.95, 0.91-0.99), and hip fracture (0.89, 0.84-0.95) were significantly lower in higher-potency statin users, while the risk for non-hip non-vertebral fracture was not significant (0.98, 0.95-1.02). The use of higher-potency statins compared to lower-potency statins was associated with a lower risk of osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, and hip fracture in patients with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信