欺骗性安慰剂与非欺骗性安慰剂对健康成人志愿者精神运动和认知功能的影响:一项开放标签交叉随机对照试验

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Archana Mishra, Sudhir Chandra Sarangi, K H Reeta
{"title":"欺骗性安慰剂与非欺骗性安慰剂对健康成人志愿者精神运动和认知功能的影响:一项开放标签交叉随机对照试验","authors":"Archana Mishra, Sudhir Chandra Sarangi, K H Reeta","doi":"10.24869/psyd.2024.340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was planned to evaluate the effect of a placebo administered with deception vs. without deception on psychomotor and cognitive functions in healthy human volunteers compared to no treatment as placebo responses tend to be circumstantial. An open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence randomized controlled cross-over trial was conducted with 54 participants in a tertiary care center. After the initial screening for eligibility, the patients were randomized into sequences. Psychomotor, executive, and memory function tests were performed before and 30 minutes after the administration of the intervention on three different days (one intervention each day). Participants showed a significant reduction in reaction time in most of the computerized tests for evaluation of psychomotor function (simple reaction time: one hand: 47.15; 95% CI: 30.99 to 63.32; p <0.001, both hands: 63.90; 95%CI: 46.23 to 81.57; p <0.001|| choice reaction time (79.83; 95%CI: 41.27 to 118.40; p<0.001) and digit picture substitution test (182.12; 95% CI: 116.0 to 248.24; p < 0.001)), executive function and memory with deceptive placebo when compared to nondeceptive placebo. No statistical difference in the paper and pencil tests was observed; however, there was a significant reduction in deceptive placebo over nondeceptive placebo or no intervention groups for trail-making tests for the executive functions. No significant difference was observed for motor functions. A deceptive placebo has a significant effect on psychomotor function compared to a nondeceptive placebo and no treatment; thus there could be differences in placebo responses in clinical trial versus clinical practice or double blind versus open label placebo. The calculation of actual drug effect in a clinical trial needs the development of an algorithm balancing for placebo response.</p>","PeriodicalId":20760,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Danubina","volume":"36 3-4","pages":"340-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECT OF DECEPTIVE VERSUS NON-DECEPTIVE PLACEBO ON PSYCHOMOTOR AND COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN HEALTHY ADULT HUMAN VOLUNTEERS: AN OPEN-LABEL CROSS-OVER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.\",\"authors\":\"Archana Mishra, Sudhir Chandra Sarangi, K H Reeta\",\"doi\":\"10.24869/psyd.2024.340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was planned to evaluate the effect of a placebo administered with deception vs. without deception on psychomotor and cognitive functions in healthy human volunteers compared to no treatment as placebo responses tend to be circumstantial. An open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence randomized controlled cross-over trial was conducted with 54 participants in a tertiary care center. After the initial screening for eligibility, the patients were randomized into sequences. Psychomotor, executive, and memory function tests were performed before and 30 minutes after the administration of the intervention on three different days (one intervention each day). Participants showed a significant reduction in reaction time in most of the computerized tests for evaluation of psychomotor function (simple reaction time: one hand: 47.15; 95% CI: 30.99 to 63.32; p <0.001, both hands: 63.90; 95%CI: 46.23 to 81.57; p <0.001|| choice reaction time (79.83; 95%CI: 41.27 to 118.40; p<0.001) and digit picture substitution test (182.12; 95% CI: 116.0 to 248.24; p < 0.001)), executive function and memory with deceptive placebo when compared to nondeceptive placebo. No statistical difference in the paper and pencil tests was observed; however, there was a significant reduction in deceptive placebo over nondeceptive placebo or no intervention groups for trail-making tests for the executive functions. No significant difference was observed for motor functions. A deceptive placebo has a significant effect on psychomotor function compared to a nondeceptive placebo and no treatment; thus there could be differences in placebo responses in clinical trial versus clinical practice or double blind versus open label placebo. The calculation of actual drug effect in a clinical trial needs the development of an algorithm balancing for placebo response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"volume\":\"36 3-4\",\"pages\":\"340-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2024.340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Danubina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2024.340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究计划评估欺骗与不欺骗安慰剂对健康人类志愿者精神运动和认知功能的影响,因为安慰剂反应往往是间接的。一项开放标签、3期、6序列的随机对照交叉试验在一家三级保健中心进行,共有54名参与者。在初步筛选合格后,患者被随机分组。精神运动、执行和记忆功能测试分别在干预前和干预后30分钟进行,时间为3天(每天1次干预)。在大多数评估精神运动功能的计算机化测试中,参与者的反应时间显著缩短(单手简单反应时间:47.15;95% CI: 30.99 ~ 63.32;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECT OF DECEPTIVE VERSUS NON-DECEPTIVE PLACEBO ON PSYCHOMOTOR AND COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN HEALTHY ADULT HUMAN VOLUNTEERS: AN OPEN-LABEL CROSS-OVER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

This study was planned to evaluate the effect of a placebo administered with deception vs. without deception on psychomotor and cognitive functions in healthy human volunteers compared to no treatment as placebo responses tend to be circumstantial. An open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence randomized controlled cross-over trial was conducted with 54 participants in a tertiary care center. After the initial screening for eligibility, the patients were randomized into sequences. Psychomotor, executive, and memory function tests were performed before and 30 minutes after the administration of the intervention on three different days (one intervention each day). Participants showed a significant reduction in reaction time in most of the computerized tests for evaluation of psychomotor function (simple reaction time: one hand: 47.15; 95% CI: 30.99 to 63.32; p <0.001, both hands: 63.90; 95%CI: 46.23 to 81.57; p <0.001|| choice reaction time (79.83; 95%CI: 41.27 to 118.40; p<0.001) and digit picture substitution test (182.12; 95% CI: 116.0 to 248.24; p < 0.001)), executive function and memory with deceptive placebo when compared to nondeceptive placebo. No statistical difference in the paper and pencil tests was observed; however, there was a significant reduction in deceptive placebo over nondeceptive placebo or no intervention groups for trail-making tests for the executive functions. No significant difference was observed for motor functions. A deceptive placebo has a significant effect on psychomotor function compared to a nondeceptive placebo and no treatment; thus there could be differences in placebo responses in clinical trial versus clinical practice or double blind versus open label placebo. The calculation of actual drug effect in a clinical trial needs the development of an algorithm balancing for placebo response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Danubina
Psychiatria Danubina 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatria Danubina is a peer-reviewed open access journal of the Psychiatric Danubian Association, aimed to publish original scientific contributions in psychiatry, psychological medicine and related science (neurosciences, biological, psychological, and social sciences as well as philosophy of science and medical ethics, history, organization and economics of mental health services).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信