Brendan K Tao, David Gou, Jacqueline Chen, Rachel Phord-Toy, Janaya Lo, Chia-Chen Tsai, Edsel Ing, Christian El-Hadad
{"title":"加拿大与美国眼科住院医师计划网站的综合评价与比较。","authors":"Brendan K Tao, David Gou, Jacqueline Chen, Rachel Phord-Toy, Janaya Lo, Chia-Chen Tsai, Edsel Ing, Christian El-Hadad","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2447725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We descriptively and comparatively evaluated the comprehensiveness of Canadian and US-accredited ophthalmology residency program websites as of August 28, 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Canadian Resident Matching Service (<i>n</i> = 15) and US Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (<i>n</i> = 125), we assessed website content across seven criteria: recruitment, faculty, residents, education/research, teaching, benefits, and community. Two independent reviewers used a 40-point system, with Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc pairwise tests for analysis by country and funding model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US programs more frequently had highly comprehensive websites than Canadian programs (US: 74.4%, Canada: 40%). Canadian programs mostly achieved moderate comprehensiveness (Canada: 60%, US: 22.4%). Larger program size and US origin were significantly linked to higher comprehensiveness scores (<i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that US-based, larger programs offer more extensive online resources. We recommend standardized guidelines to improve residency program website transparency and accessibility for medical learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Comparison of the Comprehensiveness of Canadian and American Ophthalmology Residency Program Websites.\",\"authors\":\"Brendan K Tao, David Gou, Jacqueline Chen, Rachel Phord-Toy, Janaya Lo, Chia-Chen Tsai, Edsel Ing, Christian El-Hadad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2024.2447725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We descriptively and comparatively evaluated the comprehensiveness of Canadian and US-accredited ophthalmology residency program websites as of August 28, 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Canadian Resident Matching Service (<i>n</i> = 15) and US Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (<i>n</i> = 125), we assessed website content across seven criteria: recruitment, faculty, residents, education/research, teaching, benefits, and community. Two independent reviewers used a 40-point system, with Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc pairwise tests for analysis by country and funding model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US programs more frequently had highly comprehensive websites than Canadian programs (US: 74.4%, Canada: 40%). Canadian programs mostly achieved moderate comprehensiveness (Canada: 60%, US: 22.4%). Larger program size and US origin were significantly linked to higher comprehensiveness scores (<i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that US-based, larger programs offer more extensive online resources. We recommend standardized guidelines to improve residency program website transparency and accessibility for medical learners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2447725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2447725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation and Comparison of the Comprehensiveness of Canadian and American Ophthalmology Residency Program Websites.
Purpose: We descriptively and comparatively evaluated the comprehensiveness of Canadian and US-accredited ophthalmology residency program websites as of August 28, 2024.
Methods: Using Canadian Resident Matching Service (n = 15) and US Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (n = 125), we assessed website content across seven criteria: recruitment, faculty, residents, education/research, teaching, benefits, and community. Two independent reviewers used a 40-point system, with Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc pairwise tests for analysis by country and funding model.
Results: US programs more frequently had highly comprehensive websites than Canadian programs (US: 74.4%, Canada: 40%). Canadian programs mostly achieved moderate comprehensiveness (Canada: 60%, US: 22.4%). Larger program size and US origin were significantly linked to higher comprehensiveness scores (p < .01).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that US-based, larger programs offer more extensive online resources. We recommend standardized guidelines to improve residency program website transparency and accessibility for medical learners.
期刊介绍：
Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
