{"title":"监测强直性脊柱炎的疾病活动和治疗反应:血液学炎症标志物的回顾性研究。","authors":"Oznur Sadioglu Cagdas, Neslihan Gokcen, Ayten Yazici, Ayse Cefle","doi":"10.1007/s00296-024-05763-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hematological markers such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are reliable indicators of inflammation. This study aims to investigate the potential role of these markers in assessing disease activity and treatment response in biologic-naive Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients following the initiation of biological agents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We designed this study as a retrospective cohort study with data obtained from a single center. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were used to evaluate disease activity and functional status of AS patients. Laboratory results at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were documented. We calculated hematologic inflammatory markers for each visit. Mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54 biologic-naive patients with AS were included in this study. These inflammatory markers, except RDW, decreased over time. BASDAI, BASFI, CRP and ESR were significantly lower at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to baseline values (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, NLR, PLR, and MLR showed a statistically significant decrease at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to baseline values (all p < 0.001). However, when comparing the values at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, no statistically significant differences were observed. We also found no correlation between hematological inflammatory markers and BASDAI scores, despite observing some correlations between hematological markers and acute phase reactants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These markers could be valuable assessment tools for indicating disease activity and monitoring patients with AS after initiating biological treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring disease activity and treatment response in ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study of hematologic inflammatory markers.\",\"authors\":\"Oznur Sadioglu Cagdas, Neslihan Gokcen, Ayten Yazici, Ayse Cefle\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-024-05763-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hematological markers such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are reliable indicators of inflammation. This study aims to investigate the potential role of these markers in assessing disease activity and treatment response in biologic-naive Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients following the initiation of biological agents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We designed this study as a retrospective cohort study with data obtained from a single center. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were used to evaluate disease activity and functional status of AS patients. Laboratory results at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were documented. We calculated hematologic inflammatory markers for each visit. Mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>54 biologic-naive patients with AS were included in this study. These inflammatory markers, except RDW, decreased over time. BASDAI, BASFI, CRP and ESR were significantly lower at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to baseline values (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, NLR, PLR, and MLR showed a statistically significant decrease at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to baseline values (all p < 0.001). However, when comparing the values at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, no statistically significant differences were observed. We also found no correlation between hematological inflammatory markers and BASDAI scores, despite observing some correlations between hematological markers and acute phase reactants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These markers could be valuable assessment tools for indicating disease activity and monitoring patients with AS after initiating biological treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05763-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05763-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monitoring disease activity and treatment response in ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study of hematologic inflammatory markers.
Background: Hematological markers such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are reliable indicators of inflammation. This study aims to investigate the potential role of these markers in assessing disease activity and treatment response in biologic-naive Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients following the initiation of biological agents.
Materials and methods: We designed this study as a retrospective cohort study with data obtained from a single center. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) were used to evaluate disease activity and functional status of AS patients. Laboratory results at baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were documented. We calculated hematologic inflammatory markers for each visit. Mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) were also noted.
Results: 54 biologic-naive patients with AS were included in this study. These inflammatory markers, except RDW, decreased over time. BASDAI, BASFI, CRP and ESR were significantly lower at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to baseline values (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, NLR, PLR, and MLR showed a statistically significant decrease at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to baseline values (all p < 0.001). However, when comparing the values at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, no statistically significant differences were observed. We also found no correlation between hematological inflammatory markers and BASDAI scores, despite observing some correlations between hematological markers and acute phase reactants.
Conclusion: These markers could be valuable assessment tools for indicating disease activity and monitoring patients with AS after initiating biological treatment.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.