单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)婴儿外科整形(PSIO)中使用对准器NAM进行鼻牙槽成型的临床疗效回顾性研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Batra Puneet, Bruno Frazao Gribel, Talwar Aditya, Arora Garima
{"title":"单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)婴儿外科整形(PSIO)中使用对准器NAM进行鼻牙槽成型的临床疗效回顾性研究。","authors":"Batra Puneet, Bruno Frazao Gribel, Talwar Aditya, Arora Garima","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study compares and evaluates planned virtual outcomes with actual post-treatment outcomes to assess the accuracy and predictability of clinical results during presurgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) with AlignerNAM in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Institutional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>14 UCLP patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Digital models for infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone PSIO with AlignerNAM between 1 and 6 weeks were obtained at three stages-pretreatment (T<sub>o</sub>), planned (T<sub>p</sub>) and post-treatment (T<sub>1</sub>). Linear and angular measurements were made on these using the OrthoAnalyser software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A paired t-test and Bland-Altman analysis assessed the accuracy between predicted and achieved movements, while inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were also calculated using digital records of seven patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the clinical outcome (post-treatment) values and the predicted values (obtained from the virtual post-treatment simulation/planned movement). The sagittal reduction in the cleft defect demonstrated the highest accuracy (97.71%), followed by the transverse reduction (95.1%). Overall, linear measurements achieved an accuracy of 94.57% and angular measurements an accuracy of 93.64%. All measurements were within the limits of agreement based on the Bland-Altman plots. The widths of limits of agreement were narrow and similar for both linear and angular measurements showing high levels of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AlignerNAM showed high accuracy in reducing cleft size and aligning alveolar segments in UCLP patients, achieving accuracy rates above 90% in both linear and angular dimensions. AlignerNAM appliance is a suitable alternative to conventional PSIO techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Nasoalveolar Moulding Using Aligner NAM During Presurgical Infant Orthopaedics (PSIO) in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (UCLP): A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Batra Puneet, Bruno Frazao Gribel, Talwar Aditya, Arora Garima\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study compares and evaluates planned virtual outcomes with actual post-treatment outcomes to assess the accuracy and predictability of clinical results during presurgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) with AlignerNAM in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Institutional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>14 UCLP patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Digital models for infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone PSIO with AlignerNAM between 1 and 6 weeks were obtained at three stages-pretreatment (T<sub>o</sub>), planned (T<sub>p</sub>) and post-treatment (T<sub>1</sub>). Linear and angular measurements were made on these using the OrthoAnalyser software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A paired t-test and Bland-Altman analysis assessed the accuracy between predicted and achieved movements, while inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were also calculated using digital records of seven patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the clinical outcome (post-treatment) values and the predicted values (obtained from the virtual post-treatment simulation/planned movement). The sagittal reduction in the cleft defect demonstrated the highest accuracy (97.71%), followed by the transverse reduction (95.1%). Overall, linear measurements achieved an accuracy of 94.57% and angular measurements an accuracy of 93.64%. All measurements were within the limits of agreement based on the Bland-Altman plots. The widths of limits of agreement were narrow and similar for both linear and angular measurements showing high levels of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AlignerNAM showed high accuracy in reducing cleft size and aligning alveolar segments in UCLP patients, achieving accuracy rates above 90% in both linear and angular dimensions. AlignerNAM appliance is a suitable alternative to conventional PSIO techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12891\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过对计划的虚拟结果与实际的治疗后结果进行比较和评估,以评估使用AlignerNAM进行单侧唇腭裂婴儿整形手术(PSIO)临床结果的准确性和可预测性。设置:机构研究。参与者:14例UCLP患者。材料与方法:对使用AlignerNAM进行1 ~ 6周PSIO治疗的单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患儿进行预处理(To)、计划(Tp)和治疗后(T1)三个阶段的数字模型。使用OrthoAnalyser软件(3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark)对这些进行线性和角度测量。配对t检验和Bland-Altman分析评估了预测和实现运动之间的准确性,同时也使用7名患者的数字记录计算了内部和内部的可靠性。结果:研究发现临床结果(治疗后)值与预测值(通过虚拟治疗后模拟/计划运动获得)无显著差异(p > 0.05)。矢状面复位对腭裂缺损的准确率最高(97.71%),其次是横向复位(95.1%)。总体而言,线性测量的精度为94.57%,角度测量的精度为93.64%。所有测量结果均在Bland-Altman图的一致范围内。在线性测量和角度测量中,一致的极限宽度窄且相似,显示出高度一致。结论:AlignerNAM对UCLP患者的牙槽段缩小和对准具有较高的准确性,在线性和角度尺寸上均达到90%以上的准确率。AlignerNAM设备是传统PSIO技术的合适替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Efficacy of Nasoalveolar Moulding Using Aligner NAM During Presurgical Infant Orthopaedics (PSIO) in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (UCLP): A Retrospective Study.

Objective: The study compares and evaluates planned virtual outcomes with actual post-treatment outcomes to assess the accuracy and predictability of clinical results during presurgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) with AlignerNAM in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Setting: Institutional study.

Participants: 14 UCLP patients.

Materials and methods: Digital models for infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone PSIO with AlignerNAM between 1 and 6 weeks were obtained at three stages-pretreatment (To), planned (Tp) and post-treatment (T1). Linear and angular measurements were made on these using the OrthoAnalyser software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A paired t-test and Bland-Altman analysis assessed the accuracy between predicted and achieved movements, while inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were also calculated using digital records of seven patients.

Results: The study found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the clinical outcome (post-treatment) values and the predicted values (obtained from the virtual post-treatment simulation/planned movement). The sagittal reduction in the cleft defect demonstrated the highest accuracy (97.71%), followed by the transverse reduction (95.1%). Overall, linear measurements achieved an accuracy of 94.57% and angular measurements an accuracy of 93.64%. All measurements were within the limits of agreement based on the Bland-Altman plots. The widths of limits of agreement were narrow and similar for both linear and angular measurements showing high levels of agreement.

Conclusion: AlignerNAM showed high accuracy in reducing cleft size and aligning alveolar segments in UCLP patients, achieving accuracy rates above 90% in both linear and angular dimensions. AlignerNAM appliance is a suitable alternative to conventional PSIO techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信