Batra Puneet, Bruno Frazao Gribel, Talwar Aditya, Arora Garima
{"title":"单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)婴儿外科整形(PSIO)中使用对准器NAM进行鼻牙槽成型的临床疗效回顾性研究。","authors":"Batra Puneet, Bruno Frazao Gribel, Talwar Aditya, Arora Garima","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study compares and evaluates planned virtual outcomes with actual post-treatment outcomes to assess the accuracy and predictability of clinical results during presurgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) with AlignerNAM in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Institutional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>14 UCLP patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Digital models for infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone PSIO with AlignerNAM between 1 and 6 weeks were obtained at three stages-pretreatment (T<sub>o</sub>), planned (T<sub>p</sub>) and post-treatment (T<sub>1</sub>). Linear and angular measurements were made on these using the OrthoAnalyser software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A paired t-test and Bland-Altman analysis assessed the accuracy between predicted and achieved movements, while inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were also calculated using digital records of seven patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the clinical outcome (post-treatment) values and the predicted values (obtained from the virtual post-treatment simulation/planned movement). The sagittal reduction in the cleft defect demonstrated the highest accuracy (97.71%), followed by the transverse reduction (95.1%). Overall, linear measurements achieved an accuracy of 94.57% and angular measurements an accuracy of 93.64%. All measurements were within the limits of agreement based on the Bland-Altman plots. The widths of limits of agreement were narrow and similar for both linear and angular measurements showing high levels of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AlignerNAM showed high accuracy in reducing cleft size and aligning alveolar segments in UCLP patients, achieving accuracy rates above 90% in both linear and angular dimensions. AlignerNAM appliance is a suitable alternative to conventional PSIO techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Nasoalveolar Moulding Using Aligner NAM During Presurgical Infant Orthopaedics (PSIO) in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (UCLP): A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Batra Puneet, Bruno Frazao Gribel, Talwar Aditya, Arora Garima\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study compares and evaluates planned virtual outcomes with actual post-treatment outcomes to assess the accuracy and predictability of clinical results during presurgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) with AlignerNAM in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Institutional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>14 UCLP patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Digital models for infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone PSIO with AlignerNAM between 1 and 6 weeks were obtained at three stages-pretreatment (T<sub>o</sub>), planned (T<sub>p</sub>) and post-treatment (T<sub>1</sub>). Linear and angular measurements were made on these using the OrthoAnalyser software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A paired t-test and Bland-Altman analysis assessed the accuracy between predicted and achieved movements, while inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were also calculated using digital records of seven patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the clinical outcome (post-treatment) values and the predicted values (obtained from the virtual post-treatment simulation/planned movement). The sagittal reduction in the cleft defect demonstrated the highest accuracy (97.71%), followed by the transverse reduction (95.1%). Overall, linear measurements achieved an accuracy of 94.57% and angular measurements an accuracy of 93.64%. All measurements were within the limits of agreement based on the Bland-Altman plots. The widths of limits of agreement were narrow and similar for both linear and angular measurements showing high levels of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AlignerNAM showed high accuracy in reducing cleft size and aligning alveolar segments in UCLP patients, achieving accuracy rates above 90% in both linear and angular dimensions. AlignerNAM appliance is a suitable alternative to conventional PSIO techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12891\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Efficacy of Nasoalveolar Moulding Using Aligner NAM During Presurgical Infant Orthopaedics (PSIO) in Infants With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (UCLP): A Retrospective Study.
Objective: The study compares and evaluates planned virtual outcomes with actual post-treatment outcomes to assess the accuracy and predictability of clinical results during presurgical infant orthopaedics (PSIO) with AlignerNAM in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Setting: Institutional study.
Participants: 14 UCLP patients.
Materials and methods: Digital models for infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone PSIO with AlignerNAM between 1 and 6 weeks were obtained at three stages-pretreatment (To), planned (Tp) and post-treatment (T1). Linear and angular measurements were made on these using the OrthoAnalyser software (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). A paired t-test and Bland-Altman analysis assessed the accuracy between predicted and achieved movements, while inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were also calculated using digital records of seven patients.
Results: The study found no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the clinical outcome (post-treatment) values and the predicted values (obtained from the virtual post-treatment simulation/planned movement). The sagittal reduction in the cleft defect demonstrated the highest accuracy (97.71%), followed by the transverse reduction (95.1%). Overall, linear measurements achieved an accuracy of 94.57% and angular measurements an accuracy of 93.64%. All measurements were within the limits of agreement based on the Bland-Altman plots. The widths of limits of agreement were narrow and similar for both linear and angular measurements showing high levels of agreement.
Conclusion: AlignerNAM showed high accuracy in reducing cleft size and aligning alveolar segments in UCLP patients, achieving accuracy rates above 90% in both linear and angular dimensions. AlignerNAM appliance is a suitable alternative to conventional PSIO techniques.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.